Syrian Sarah Mardini among dozens facing charges in Greece for humanitarian work

Sarah Mardini at the premiere of ”The Swimmers" , based on her story as a Syrian asylum seeker. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 December 2022
Follow

Syrian Sarah Mardini among dozens facing charges in Greece for humanitarian work

  • Humanitarians protected under international law should be acquitted, rights group says
  • Defendants could face up to eight years in prison if convicted

LONDON: Sarah Mardini, the sister of Olympic swimmer Yusra Mardini, is among two dozen humanitarian workers facing charges in Greece for their humanitarian work on the island of Lesbos, Human Rights Watch says.

A European Parliament report identified it as “the largest case of criminalization of solidarity in Europe.” 

The  24 defendants from the Emergency Response Centre International will stand on trial Jan. 10 in Mytilene on Lesbos, on misdemeanor charges related to their  search-and-rescue efforts at sea helping asylum-seekers.

The registered non-governmental organization regularly cooperated with Greek authorities on missions in Greek waters and on Lesbos from 2016 to 2018.

Mardini and the other defendants face up to eight years in prison if convicted of the charges, which include espionage and forgery.

HRW said on Thursday that Greek prosecutors should request the acquittal of humanitarians on trial for search-and-rescue efforts that are protected under international human rights law. 

“This case is really an indictment of the Greek authorities, who are going after people for saving lives the authorities didn’t want them to save,” HRW Children’s Rights Associate Director Bill Van Esveld said. 

“Meanwhile the Greek government continues to restrict humanitarian rescue while also illegally pushing back refugees and migrants, forcing them into the deadly situations that humanitarians tried to alleviate,” Esveld added.

According to the rights group, the charges are based on a Greek police report that contains obvious factual errors, such as claims that some of the accused participated in rescue missions on multiple dates when they were not in Greece. 

Mardini, who lives in Germany, was previously barred from entering Greece to attend her own trial, which is a violation of the right to be present at one’s own trial enshrined in international, European, and Greek law. 

Her lawyers have stated that it is unclear whether she will be allowed to enter the country for the trial in January. 

“The Swimmers,” a Netflix film based on Mardini and her sister’s story, was recently released. In 2015, the two traveled by boat from Turkey to Greece as Syrian asylum-seekers. When the engine failed, they aided other passengers by swimming and keeping the boat afloat. 

Mardini later returned to Lesbos as a search-and-rescue volunteer. She was arrested on Aug. 21, 2018 and held for 106 days.
 


Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

Updated 59 min 28 sec ago
Follow

Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

  • A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point
  • The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught

WASHING: President Donald Trump sued the BBC on Monday for defamation over edited clips of a speech that made it appear he directed supporters to storm the US Capitol, opening an international front in his fight against media coverage he deems untrue or unfair. Trump accused Britain’s publicly owned broadcaster of defaming him by splicing together parts of a January 6, 2021 speech, including one section where he told supporters to march on the Capitol and another where he said “fight like hell.” It omitted a section in which he called for peaceful protest.
Trump’s lawsuit alleges the BBC defamed him and violated a Florida law that bars deceptive and unfair trade practices. He is seeking $5 billion in damages for each of the lawsuit’s two counts. The BBC has apologized to Trump, admitted an error of judgment and acknowledged that the edit gave the mistaken impression that he had made a direct call for violent action. But it has said there is no legal basis to sue.
Trump, in his lawsuit filed Monday in Miami federal court, said the BBC despite its apology “has made no showing of actual remorse for its wrongdoing nor meaningful institutional changes to prevent future journalistic abuses.”
The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught.
A spokesman for Trump’s legal team said in a statement the BBC “has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda.”
A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point. Our position remains the same.” The broadcaster did not immediately respond to a request for comment after the lawsuit was filed.

CRISIS LED TO RESIGNATIONS
Facing one of the biggest crises in its 103-year history, the BBC has said it has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary on any of its platforms.
The dispute over the clip, featured on the BBC’s “Panorama” documentary show shortly before the 2024 presidential election, sparked a public relations crisis for the broadcaster, leading to the resignations of its two most senior officials.
Trump’s lawyers say the BBC caused him overwhelming reputational and financial harm.
The documentary drew scrutiny after the leak of a BBC memo by an external standards adviser that raised concerns about how it was edited, part of a wider investigation of political bias at the publicly funded broadcaster.
The documentary was not broadcast in the United States.
Trump may have sued in the US because defamation claims in Britain must be brought within a year of publication, a window that has closed for the “Panorama” episode.
To overcome the US Constitution’s legal protections for free speech and the press, Trump will need to prove not only that the edit was false and defamatory but also that the BBC knowingly misled viewers or acted recklessly.
The broadcaster could argue that the documentary was substantially true and its editing decisions did not create a false impression, legal experts said. It could also claim the program did not damage Trump’s reputation.
Other media have settled with Trump, including CBS and ABC when Trump sued them following his comeback win in the November 2024 election.
Trump has filed lawsuits against the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and a newspaper in Iowa, all three of which have denied wrongdoing. The attack on the US Capitol in January 2021 was aimed at blocking Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s presidential win over Trump in the 2020 US election.