ICC gives flat wicket in Rawalpindi another demerit point

In the picture taken on March 7, 2022, Pakistan's captain Babar Azam (top C) inspects the pitch along with Australia's players at the Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium in Rawalpindi. (Photo courtesy: AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 13 December 2022
Follow

ICC gives flat wicket in Rawalpindi another demerit point

  • The ICC on Tuesday said match referee Andy Pycroft rated the pitch ‘below average’
  • England plundered a record 506-4 on Day 1 with four of its batters scoring centuries

ISLAMABAD: The flat wicket at Pindi Cricket Stadium has received another demerit point within nine months from the International Cricket Council after England recorded a historic 74-run victory over Pakistan in the first test at Rawalpindi last week.

The ICC on Tuesday said match referee Andy Pycroft rated the pitch “below average” as England plundered a world-record 506-4 on Day 1 with four of its batters scoring centuries.

England went on to score 657 in 101 overs before Pakistan also replied with 579, with three batters from the home team scoring hundreds.

“It was a very flat pitch which gave almost no assistance to any type of bowler,” Pycroft said in an ICC statement. “That was the main reason why batters scored very fast and both sides posted huge totals. The pitch hardly deteriorated during the course of the match.”

England went on to win its first test in Pakistan in 17 years after Pakistan lost its last five wickets for nine runs and got bowled out for 268 in dimming light on the last day. England has since clinched the series with a narrow win in the second cricket test at Multan.

In March, a similar type of wicket at the same venue received a demerit point from the ICC when only 14 wickets fell over five days in a test match between Pakistan and Australia.

A venue can be suspended from hosting international cricket if it accumulates five demerit points within five years.


Pakistan’s Mahnoor Omer named among TIME’s ‘Women of the Year’ for 2026

Updated 01 March 2026
Follow

Pakistan’s Mahnoor Omer named among TIME’s ‘Women of the Year’ for 2026

  • Omer moved a Pakistani court against the so-called ‘period tax’ in Sept. 2025 which has since sparked a national debate
  • Taxes on sanitary pads in Pakistan can add up to 40 percent to retail price, UNICEF says only around 12 percent women use such products

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani women’s rights activist Mahnoor Omer, who fought against taxes on menstrual products, has been named among the TIME magazine’s ‘Women of the Year’ for 2026.

Omer’s efforts have been recognized alongside 16 activists, artists, athletes and businesswomen in the TIME’s Women of the Year 2026 list, including Olympic gold medalist Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone and Oscar-nominated filmmaker Chloe Zhao.

Dissatisfied with the efforts to educate Pakistani girls about sexual violence, Omer founded the Noor Foundation at the age of 14 and held her own workshops with village girls about everything from climate change to menstruation, according to the TIME magazine.

Two years later, a conversation with a domestic worker about the price of pads made her realize that not everyone could afford these essentials. She moved a court against the so-called “period tax” in Sept. 2025 and the case has sparked a national debate on the subject, considered a taboo by many in Pakistan, since its first hearing late last year.

“A decade and one law degree after her interest in activism was sparked, Omer, now 25, is putting her passion and expertise to work in the name of gender equity,” TIME wrote about Omer on its website.

Taxes imposed on sanitary products in Pakistan can add up to 40 percent to the retail price. UNICEF estimates just 12 percent of women in the country use commercially produced pads or tampons. The alternative, using cloth, risks health impacts including rashes and infections, and can make it impossible for girls to attend school while menstruating.

Omer’s suit, which awaits the government response, has sparked a national discussion. She says she spoke about menstruation to her father and male cousins, who thanked her for standing up for their daughters.
The 25-year-old, who is currently enrolled in a master’s degree in gender, peace, and security at the London School of Economics, sees this case as just the first of many.

“I’m not free until every woman is free,” she was quoted as saying by TIME. “I want to leave no stones unturned in terms of what I can do with the next few decades, as a lawyer for the women in my country and gender minorities in general.”