Palestinians welcome Australian rejection of Jerusalem as Israeli capital

1 / 2
Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh said that he hoped that Australia would now recognize the state of Palestine on the borders of June 4, 1967. (Reuters)
2 / 2
Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said that “Australia is committed to a two-state solution in which Israel and a future Palestinian state coexist, in peace and security.” (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 18 October 2022
Follow

Palestinians welcome Australian rejection of Jerusalem as Israeli capital

  • PM Mohammad Shtayyeh said that the decision was in line with international law and sent a message to Israel that the world does not accept its annexation of the Palestinian Territories
  • Shtayyeh praised the Australian PM Anthony Albanese for the “wise and courageous” decision

RAMALLAH: Australia has said it will no longer recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, in a policy reversal criticized by Israel but welcomed by Palestinians.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said that the city’s status should be decided by Israeli-Palestinian peace talks as she revoked a contentious decision by the previous conservative government.

“Australia is committed to a two-state solution in which Israel and a future Palestinian state coexist, in peace and security, within internationally recognized borders,” Wong said. “We will not support an approach that undermines this prospect.”

Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh said that the decision was in line with international law and sent a message to Israel that the world does not accept its annexation of the Palestinian Territories.

He praised the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for the “wise and courageous” decision, which he said proved “Australia’s respect and alignment with the values of truth, justice and freedom, and the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people.”

He said that he hoped that Australia would now recognize the state of Palestine on the borders of June 4, 1967 and that Jerusalem was its capital.

Hussein Al-Sheikh, a senior Palestine Liberation Organization official, tweeted: “We value Australia’s decision on Jerusalem and its call for a two-state solution under international legitimacy, and its assertion that the future of sovereignty over Jerusalem depends on the permanent solution based on international legitimacy, which is the two-state solution.”

The Israeli government said it was disappointed with the Australian reversal. 

Israel’s Foreign Ministry summoned the Australian ambassador to lodge its protest, while Prime Minister Yair Lapid said: “Jerusalem is Israel’s eternal and united capital, and nothing will ever change that.”

Ahmed Al-Deek, an adviser to the Palestinian foreign minister, told Arab News that the previous Australian government had committed a historic mistake.

“We are engaged in a diplomatic-political battle at the international level over Jerusalem, as Jerusalem constitutes the key to peace in the region, and there is no Palestinian state without Jerusalem,” he said.

“Israel is trying to persuade countries to transfer their embassies to Jerusalem and recognize it as the unified capital of Israel. We hope that the Australian move will end Israeli efforts in that context,” he added.

Al-Deek called for more reversals, as “there is almost an international consensus that Jerusalem is an integral part of the Palestinian Territories occupied in 1967. The issue is to be decided by negotiations, not by the occupation force.”

Basim Naeim, a Hamas official, said that his group considered the decision a step in the right direction for world peace and stability and “new evidence of the diplomatic failure of Israel.

“Jerusalem has been and will always be the core of the Palestinian people’s freedom struggle against the Israeli occupation,” he said.

“The Israeli occupation had been trying to impose a new reality to deny the Palestinians their rights, blatantly disregarding the international law regarding Jerusalem and its sanctities.”

He called on the international community to hold Israel’s leaders accountable for the “war crimes and crimes against humanity committed against our Palestinian people.”

Israel annexed East Jerusalem following the Six-Day War of 1967, and has declared the entire city its “eternal and indivisible capital.” Palestinians claim the eastern sector as the capital of their future state.

In 2017, the then-US President Donald Trump changed seven decades of American foreign policy by stating that Jerusalem was the capital of Israel. The US relocated its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem the following year. Several countries, including Australia, then followed Trump’s lead.


Sudan’s prime minister takes his peace plan to the UN, but US urges humanitarian truce now

Updated 8 sec ago
Follow

Sudan’s prime minister takes his peace plan to the UN, but US urges humanitarian truce now

  • Sudan’s prime minister is proposing a wide-ranging peace initiative to end a nearly 1,000-day war with a rival paramilitary force
  • It seems unlikely the RSF would support the proposal, which would essentially give government forces a victory and take away their military power
UNITED NATIONS: Sudan’s prime minister on Monday proposed a wide-ranging peace initiative to end a nearly 1,000-day war with a rival paramilitary force, but the United States urged both sides to accept the Trump administration’s call for an immediate humanitarian truce.
Kamil Idris, who heads Sudan’s transitional civilian government, told the Security Council his plan calls for a ceasefire monitored by the United Nations, African Union and Arab League, and the withdrawal of paramilitary forces from all areas they occupy, their placement in supervised camps and their disarmament.
Sudan plunged into chaos in April 2023 when a power struggle between the military and the powerful paramilitary Rapid Support Forces exploded into open fighting, with widespread mass killings and rapes, and ethnically motivated violence. This has amounted to war crimes and crimes against humanity, according to the UN and international rights groups.
It seemed highly unlikely the RSF would support the prime minister’s proposal, which would essentially give government forces a victory and take away their military power.
In an indirect reference to the truce supported by the US and key mediators Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates, known as the Quad, Idris stressed to the UN Security Council that the government’s proposal is “homemade — not imposed on us.”
In early November, the Rapid Support Forces agreed to a humanitarian truce. At that time, a Sudanese military official told The Associated Press the army welcomed the Quad’s proposal but would only agree to a truce when the RSF completely withdraws from civilian areas and gives up their weapons — key provisions in the plan Idris put forward on Monday.
Idris said unless the paramilitary forces were confined to camps, a truce had “no chance for success.” He challenged the 15 members of the Security Council to back his proposal.
“This initiative can mark the moment when Sudan steps back from the edge and the international community — You! You! — stood on the right side of history,” the Sudanese prime minister said. He said the council should “be remembered not as a witness to collapse, but as a partner in recovery.”
US deputy ambassador Jeffrey Bartos, who spoke to the council before Idris, said the Trump administration has offered a humanitarian truce as a way forward and “We urge both belligerents to accept this plan without preconditions immediately.”
Bartos said the Trump administration strongly condemns the horrific violence across Darfur and the Kordofan region — and the atrocities committed by both the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces, who must be held accountable.
UAE Ambassador Mohamed Abushahab, a member of the Quad, said there is an immediate opportunity to implement the humanitarian truce and get aid to Sudanese civilians in desperate need.
“Lessons of history and present realities make it clear that unilateral efforts by either of the warring parties are not sustainable and will only prolong the war,” he warned.
Abushahab said a humanitarian truce must be followed by a permanent ceasefire “and a pathway toward civilian rule independent of the warring parties.”
UN Assistant Secretary-General for political affairs Khaled Khiari reflected escalating council concerns about the Sudan war, which has been fueled by the continuing supply of increasingly sophisticated weapons.
He criticized unnamed countries that refuse to stop supplying weapons, and both government and paramilitary forces for remaining unwilling to compromise or de-escalate.
“While they were able to stop fighting to preserve oil revenues, they have so far failed to do the same to protect their population,” Khiari said. “The backers of both sides must use their influence to help stop the slaughter, not to cause further devastation.”
The devastating war in Sudan has killed more than 40,000 people according to UN figures, but aid groups say the true number could be many times higher. The conflict has created the world’s largest humanitarian crisis, with over 14 million people displaced, disease outbreaks and famine spreading in parts of the country.