Christmas bells ring after thirty years at oldest church in Indian-administered Kashmir

An inside view of Saint Luke's church on the day of its reopening on December 22, 2021. The 125-year-old church in Srinagar, Indian-administered Kashmir, the oldest in the region, held Christmas mass for the first time in thirty years on Saturday after the building reopened to the public. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 25 December 2021
Follow

Christmas bells ring after thirty years at oldest church in Indian-administered Kashmir

  • Since 2016, around 35,00 Christians in region of 12 million people have demanded restoration of church shut since 1990s
  • Foundation stone of Saint Luke’s Church in Srinagar was laid by brothers Earnest and Dr Arthur Neve in 1896

NEW DELHI: The 125-year-old Saint Luke’s church in Indian-administered Kashmir, the oldest in the region, held Christmas mass for the first time in thirty years on Saturday after the building reopened to the public earlier this week.

Around 35,00 Christians in the region of 12 million people have been demanding the restoration of the church since 2016. Renovation work on the building was started in 2019 by the Jammu and Kashmir tourism department. The repair works cost approximately $80,000.

India is home to one of Asia’s oldest and largest Christian communities, with more than 30 million adherents. News of the church’s reopening comes as media has reported widespread persecution of the Christian community, with the New York Times saying anti-Christian vigilantes were sweeping through villages, storming churches, burning Christian literature, attacking schools and assaulting worshipers.

“We, as a whole community, are very happy, it's like a dream come true,” Reverend Eric Tarsem, the head priest at the church told Arab News on Saturday, commenting on the reopening of the building. “We thank the government in Kashmir for renovating and restoring the church.”

The foundation stone of Saint Luke’s Church, located in the Dalgate area of Srinagar, was laid by brothers Earnest Neve and Dr Arthur Neve on September 12, 1896. The brothers were the first to introduce modern medicine in Kashmir and vaccinations for cholera and smallpox in the late 19th century. They also established the Kashmir Mission Hospital in 1888.

The church was shut down in the early 1990s when insurgents launched an armed rebellion against New Delhi’s rule in India’s only Muslim majority region, which has been at the heart of tensions between Hindu-majority India and Muslim Pakistan for decades and the cause of two of the three wars between the nuclear-armed neighbours. Both countries claim the region in full, but each rules only in part.

On Saturday, just three days after the church’s reopening, more than 100 people gathered there to offer Christmas prayers.

“The opening of the church means a lot to us,” Grace Palijor, a fourth-generation Christian in Srinagar, told Arab News. “We are a minority community in Kashmir. The renovation means a lot to us. It is an acknowledgement of the service the Christian missionaries have served and developed this land all these years.”

Prime Minister Narendra Modi also sent Christmas greetings to India’s Christians on Twitter.

“Christmas greetings to everyone! We recall the life and noble teachings of Jesus Christ, which placed topmost emphasis on service, kindness and humility. May everyone be healthy and prosperous. May there be harmony all around.”

Palijor, who runs a school in the city and sang in the choir at Saint Luke’s on Saturday, called the reopening of the church “a good omen" for Kashmir.

"It is a reassertion of Kashmir’s syncretism," she said. "We feel accepted in the community, it’s a very good gesture and it brings hope and peace, especially in the festive season of Christmas.”


Youth voters take center stage in Bangladesh election after student-led regime change

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Youth voters take center stage in Bangladesh election after student-led regime change

  • About 45% of Bangladeshis eligible to vote in Thursday’s election are aged 18-33
  • Election follows 18 months of reforms after the end of Sheikh Hasina’s 15-year rule

DHAKA: When he goes to the polls on Thursday, Atikur Rahman Toha will vote for the first time, believing that this election can bring democratic change to Bangladesh.

A philosophy student at Dhaka University, Toha was already eligible to vote in the 2024 poll but, like many others, he opted out.

“I didn’t feel motivated to even go to vote,” he said. “That was a truly one-sided election. The election system was fully corrupted. That’s why I felt demotivated. But this time I am truly excited to exercise my voting rights for the first time.”

The January 2024 vote was widely criticized by both domestic and international observers and marred by a crackdown on the opposition and allegations of voter fraud.

But the victory of the Awami League of ex-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was short-lived, as a few months later the government was ousted by a student-led uprising, which ended the 15-year rule of Bangladesh’s longest-serving leader.

The interim administration, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, took control in August 2024 and prepared a series of reforms to restructure the country’s political and institutional framework and organize the upcoming vote.

About 127.7 million Bangladeshis are eligible to cast their ballots, according to Election Commission data, with nearly a third of them, or 40.4 million, aged 18-29. Another 16.9 million are 30-33, making it a youth–dominated poll, with the voters hopeful the outcome will help continue the momentum of the 2024 student-led uprising.

“We haven’t yet fully transitioned into a democratic process. And there is no fully stable situation in the country,” Toha said. “After the election we truly hope that the situation will change.”

For Rawnak Jahan Rakamoni, also a Dhaka University student, who is graduating in information science, voting this time meant that her voice would count.

“We are feeling that we are heard, we will be heard, our opinion will matter,” she said.

“I think it is a very important moment for our country, because after many years of controversial elections, people are finally getting a chance to exercise their voting rights and people are hoping that this election will be more meaningful and credible. This should be a fair election.”

But despite the much wider representation than before, the upcoming vote will not be entirely inclusive in the absence of the Awami League, which still retains a significant foothold.

The Election Commission last year barred Hasina’s party from contesting the next national elections, after the government banned Awami League’s activities citing national security threats and a war crimes investigation against the party’s top leadership.

The UN Human Rights Office has estimated that between July 15 and Aug. 5, 2024 the former government and its security and intelligence apparatus, together with “violent elements” linked to the Awami League, “engaged systematically in serious human rights violations and abuses in a coordinated effort to suppress the protest movement.”

It estimated that at least 1,400 people were killed during the protests, with the majority shot dead from military rifles.

Rezwan Ahmed Rifat, a law student, wanted the new government to “ensure justice for the victims of the July (uprising), enforced disappearances, and other forms of torture” carried out by the previous regime.

The two main parties out of the 51 contesting Thursday’s vote are the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Jamaat-e-Islami. Jamaat, which in 2013 was banned from political participation by Hasina’s government, heads an 11-party alliance, including the National Citizen Party formed by student leaders from the 2024 movement.

“I see this election as a turning point of our country’s democratic journey … It’s not just a normal election,” said Falguni Ahmed, a psychology student who will head to the polls convinced that no matter who wins, it will result in the “democratic accountability” of the next government.

Ahmed added: “People are not voting only for their leaders; they are also voting for the restoration of democratic credibility. That’s why this election is very different.”