Arabic-speaking Brit loses racism case over request to wear Kuwaiti flag

UK citizen Dana El-Farra, 22, brought the case against security company Securitas after bosses requested she wear the badge while greeting visitors to the National Gallery in London. (Shutterstock)
Short Url
Updated 06 August 2021
Follow

Arabic-speaking Brit loses racism case over request to wear Kuwaiti flag

  • Dana El-Farra refused to wear a badge that featured the flag of a country of which she is not a citizen
  • She also told tribunal she was treated less fairly than non-Arab colleagues and subjected to ‘racial microaggressions’

LONDON: A British woman who was asked by her employer to wear a badge featuring the Kuwaiti flag, to signal that she speaks Arabic, had her claim of racial discrimination rejected by an employment tribunal on Friday.

UK citizen Dana El-Farra, 22, brought the case against security company Securitas after bosses requested she wear the badge while greeting visitors to the National Gallery in London. She told her employer her parents are from Kuwait but she holds only British citizenship.

The tribunal ruled that the request was not racist and that other comments that were made did not create a “humiliating or offensive environment for her.”

Securitas is contracted by the National Gallery, an art museum that is a very popular tourist attraction in the British capital, to supply staff to perform duties such as greeting visitors and provide security. The request to wear the badge was made in an email. It said that the purpose was to “identify your mother tongue with the appropriate flag,” but that it was not mandatory, the tribunal heard.

El-Farra refused, saying she would only wear the British flag and not “a flag which reflected a country she had never been a national of,” the tribunal was told.

In addition to her complaint about the badge, she said that colleagues treated her worse than European co-workers, and that senior colleagues made comments she described as “racial microaggressions.”

In one case, she said that after she placed her belongings on a bench beside her, her manager asked: “What is this you are opening here, a market?” This, she said, reflected a “stereotype” of Arab culture. The tribunal rejected her claim.

In another incident, a different manager emailed El-Farra and an Algerian colleague to ask: “What is your native country?” She also believed she was treated less fairly than non-Arab colleagues when she requested flexible working.

El-Farra began working for Securitas as a visitor engagement assistant in March 2018. She quit the job in November 2019 and informed the company that she intended to take her grievances to an employment tribunal.

Dismissing the claims of racial discrimination and harassment, Employment Judge Frances Spencer said: “Ms. El-Farra was sensitive about questions relating to her ethnicity. That is not a criticism. She is British and such questions can, indeed, be offensive.

“However, these questions need to be looked at in the context of Securitas’ workplace, where employees were drawn from all over the world, and may be regarded as attempts to get to know each other.

“We find that, whether taken individually or together, and in the context of Securitas’ workplace, these comments do not meet the threshold where they can be said to have violated her dignity, or to have created an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for her.”


Russia committed ‘crimes against humanity’ in deporting Ukrainian children: UN inquiry

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Russia committed ‘crimes against humanity’ in deporting Ukrainian children: UN inquiry

  • The inquiry said Russia had deported or transferred “thousands” of children from occupied areas of Ukraine, of which it had so far confirmed 1,205 cases
  • “Four years on, 80 percent of the children deported or transferred in the cases investigated by the commission have not returned,” it said

GENEVA: Moscow’s deportation and forcible transfer of children from Ukraine to Russia amounts to a crime against humanity, a United Nations team of investigators said Tuesday.
The UN’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine said it had collected evidence leading it to conclude that “Russian authorities have committed the crimes against humanity of deportation and forcible transfer, as well as of enforced disappearance of children.”
The probe was established by the UN Human Rights Council shortly after Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
The inquiry said Russia had deported or transferred “thousands” of children from occupied areas of Ukraine, of which it had so far confirmed 1,205 cases.
“Four years on, 80 percent of the children deported or transferred in the cases investigated by the commission have not returned,” it said.
Moscow has failed to establish a system facilitating returns, and has instead focused on long-term placement of the children with families or institutions in Russia, while relatives were not informed of their fate.
The commission confirmed its previous finding that Russian authorities had unlawfully deported and transferred children — as a war crime — “and that they have unjustifiably delayed their repatriation, which is also a war crime.”
These measures “were not guided by the best interests of the child,” and have violated international law, the probe found.

- Putin cited -

It said the involvement of Russian President Vladimir Putin, “including through his direct authority over entities that have steered and executed this policy, has been visible from the outset.”
In 2023, the International Criminal Court issued a war crimes arrest warrant against Putin, accusing him of “unlawfully deporting” Ukrainian children.
The issue is highly sensitive in Ukraine and remains central to negotiations for a potential peace agreement between Kyiv and Moscow.
According to Kyiv, nearly 20,000 Ukrainian children have been forcibly removed since Russia’s full-scale invasion.
Russia insists it has moved some Ukrainian children from their homes or orphanages to protect them from hostilities.
As for Russian trials in the context of its invasion of Ukraine, the commission found that Russian authorities have “systematically fabricated evidence” and “systematically violated a range of fair trial guarantees,” while judges “have not acted with independence and impartiality.”

- ‘Extreme violence’ -

The commission also probed the situation of nationals from 17 countries who were recruited — either voluntarily or through deception — to fight with Russian troops in Ukraine.
They included men from Azerbaijan, Belarus, Brazil, Cuba, Egypt, Ghana, India, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Nepal, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Turkiye and Yemen.
“After training, usually lasting between one week and 30 days, they were forced to serve on frontlines in Ukraine, often assigned extremely dangerous duties,” the commission said in its report.
Commanders arbitrarily imposed “extreme violence” as punishment for refusing orders that meant almost certain death, with soldiers describing being treated like “cannon fodder,” sent on “meat assaults” without training or necessary equipment, and “forced to advance at all costs.”
“The evidence collected demonstrates abusive behavior, cruelty, humiliation, inhuman treatment, and a total disregard for human life and dignity, perpetrated with a sense of impunity,” the report said.
Regarding Ukraine, the report voiced concern about the overly broad definition and sometimes distorted interpretation of the crime of “collaboration.”
The commission also said reports regarding violent treatment of conscientious objectors during Ukrainian mobilization were “a source of concern.”
The report will be presented at the Human Rights Council in Geneva on Thursday.
Moscow does not recognize the commission and does not answer its requests for access, information and meetings.