Aoun and Hariri ease tensions but fail to solve Lebanon’s political deadlock

Lebanon's president called Wednesday, March 17, 2021 on the prime minister-designate to form a government immediately or step aside as the country plunges deeper into economic crisis. (File/AP)
Short Url
Updated 18 March 2021
Follow

Aoun and Hariri ease tensions but fail to solve Lebanon’s political deadlock

  • Hariri says new government could re-engage with IMF and build trust
  • Country faces economic collapse after drastic devaluation of currency

BEIRUT: Lebanese President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri will meet again on Monday after they failed to resolve their differences over the formation of a new government during their meeting on Thursday.

Monday’s meeting, Hariri predicted, will “provide some answers regarding the possibility of forming a government as soon as possible.”

During the hour-long meeting on Thursday, both parties focused on easing the tension between them. “Our aim is to stop the collapse, and the meeting (sought) to ease the tensions that happened on Wednesday. I listened to the president and his remarks and we agreed to meet again on Monday,” Hariri said. “I will always remain honest. Today, there is an opportunity that we need to seize in order to reach a solution by Monday. We need to regain the trust of the international community. The current economic situation does not justify this rise in the dollar’s exchange rate, but the absence of prospects does. The goal behind this government is to halt the Lebanese pound’s collapse.”

Prior to Thursday’s meeting, the director-general of Lebanese General Security, Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim, had visited politicians including Speaker of the Parliament Nabih Berri — the leader of the Amal Movement — to attempt to help find a path towards the formation of a new government. However, leaked information suggested Ibrahim's efforts were largely unsuccessful.

Aoun had, on Thursday morning, set an appointment at 3 p.m. for Hariri, asking him to come “carrying a government-formation vision that takes into account the requirements of balance, distribution and competence, drawn from the five months that have passed since his designation.”

Mustafa Alloush, vice president of Hariri’s party the Future Movement, said on Thursday, “Hariri carried with him a file containing the same government formation he had previously suggested and he is open to all discussions except the one related to the ‘blocking third.’

“For Hariri, the aim of this meeting was to keep the channels of communication open and prevent the situation from reaching the point of no return. Aoun was very clear on Wednesday that he does not want Hariri to head the upcoming government and presented him with the ‘blocking-third’ demand to get him to step down,” Alloush continued. “What Hariri did today was to calm President Aoun down and properly deal with the situation, but Aoun needs to retract his statement.”

Monday’s meeting is now seen by observers as critical: It will potentially either lead to a solution to the government formation deadlock and therefore save the country from total collapse, or result in a dramatic end to the 146 days that have passed since the parliamentary majority entrusted Hariri with the formation of a new government. The second possibility would be seen as a failure on the part of the entire ruling class to save Lebanon from its current crisis.

Rami Al-Rayes, an advisor to the leader of the Progressive Socialist Party (PSP) Walid Jumblatt, said the PSP is “keen to maintain stability, particularly in some sensitive areas that are geographically and demographically overlapping. This requires a higher level of coordination between the actors on the ground in order to contain any tensions that might get out of hand.” He added that Jumblatt had asked regional officials to “be vigilant and closely follow up with the various official and partisan actors to maintain stability.”

On Wednesday night, protestors who had blocked a road in Beirut clashed with armed individuals believed to be supporters of the Amal Movement. Shots were fired and several people were wounded.

The Future Movement issued a statement saying that it had no connection to those events, and asked all parties to “exercise restraint, cooperate with the security and military forces, and not be dragged into anything that could aggravate the tensions and spread chaos.”

Lebanese Army Command issued a statement saying: “It was an isolated incident that led to gunfire, injuring four people who were taken to the hospital for treatment while the military intervened and contained the situation.” The statement also called on everyone to “refrain from doing anything that could threaten civil peace.”

That incident did not stop supporters of the president heading to the presidential palace carrying Lebanese flags and the flag of the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) — the party founded by Aoun and led by his son-in-law Gebran Bassil — later that night, after Aoun’s televised speech in which he said Hariri should abide by Aoun's government-formation conditions or step down.

Hariri responded by calling on Aoun to “be honest with the Lebanese people and explain the real reason why he is trying to disrupt the will of the parliament that names the prime minister-designate.” He also asked Aoun to “alleviate the suffering of the people by making way for early presidential elections.”

On Thursday, the dollar exchange rate dropped suddenly by 2,000 Lebanese pounds on the black market to between LBP12,900 and 13,000 to the dollar. However, this drop did not translate to reduced prices in the market place, reflecting merchants’ lack of trust in the state.

Protests continue, but, given the current circumstances, are generally limited to the blocking of some roads and roundabouts, along with the burning of tires.


Israel’s settler movement takes victory lap as a sparse outpost becomes a settlement within a month

Updated 59 min 18 sec ago
Follow

Israel’s settler movement takes victory lap as a sparse outpost becomes a settlement within a month

  • Smotrich, who has been in charge of Israeli settlement policy for the past three years, has overseen an aggressive construction and expansion binge aimed at dismantling any remaining hopes of establishing a Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank

YATZIV SETTLEMENT, West Bank: Celebratory music blasting from loudspeakers mixed with the sounds of construction, almost drowning out calls to prayer from a mosque in the Palestinian town across this West Bank valley.
Orthodox Jewish women in colorful head coverings, with babies on their hips, shared platters of fresh vegetables as soldiers encircled the hilltop, keeping guard.
The scene Monday reflected the culmination of Israeli settlers’ long campaign to turn this site, overlooking the Palestinian town of Beit Sahour, into a settlement. Over the years, they fended off plans to build a hospital for Palestinian children on the land, always holding tight to the hope the land would one day become theirs.
That moment is now, they say.
Smotrich goes on settlement spree
After two decades of efforts, it took just a month for their new settlement, called “Yatziv,” to go from an unauthorized outpost of a few mobile homes to a fully recognized settlement. Fittingly, the new settlement’s name means “stable” in Hebrew.
“We are standing stable here in Israel,” Finance Minister and settler leader Bezalel Smotrich told The Associated Press at Monday’s inauguration ceremony. “We’re going to be here forever. We will never establish a Palestinian state here.”
With leaders like Smotrich holding key positions in Israel’s government and establishing close ties with the Trump administration, settlers are feeling the wind at their backs.
Smotrich, who has been in charge of Israeli settlement policy for the past three years, has overseen an aggressive construction and expansion binge aimed at dismantling any remaining hopes of establishing a Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank.
While most of the world considers the settlements illegal, their impact on the ground is clear, with Palestinians saying the ever-expanding construction hems them in and makes it nearly impossible to establish a viable independent state. The Palestinians seek the West Bank, captured by Israel in 1967, as part of a future state.
With Netanyahu and Trump, settlers feel emboldened
Settlers had long set their sights on the hilltop, thanks to its position in a line of settlements surrounding Jerusalem and because they said it was significant to Jewish history. But they put up the boxy prefab homes in November because days earlier, Palestinian attackers had stabbed an Israeli to death at a nearby junction.
The attack created an impetus to justify the settlement, the local settlement council chair, Yaron Rosenthal, told AP. With the election of Israel’s far-right government in late 2022, Trump’s return to office last year and the November attack, conditions were ripe for settlers to make their move, Rosenthal said.
“We understood that there was an opportunity,” he said. “But we didn’t know it would happen so quickly.”
“Now there is the right political constellation for this to happen.”
Smotrich announced approval of the outpost, along with 18 others, on Dec. 21. That capped 20 years of effort, said Nadia Matar, a settler activist.
“Shdema was nearly lost to us,” said Matar, using the name of an Israeli military base at the site. “What prevented that outcome was perseverance.”
Back in 2006, settlers were infuriated upon hearing that Israel’s government was in talks with the US to build a Palestinian children’s hospital on the land, said Hagit Ofran, a director at Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, especially as the US Agency for International Development was funding a “peace park” at the base of the hill.
The mayor of Beit Sahour urged the US Consulate to pressure Israel to begin hospital construction, while settlers began weekly demonstrations at the site calling on Israel to quash the project, according to consulate files obtained through WikiLeaks.
It was “interesting” that settlers had “no religious, legal, or ... security claim to that land,” wrote consulate staffer Matt Fuller at the time, in an email he shared with the AP. “They just don’t want the Palestinians to have it — and for a hospital no less — a hospital that would mean fewer permits for entry to Jerusalem for treatment.”
The hospital was never built. The site was converted into a military base after the Netanyahu government came to power in 2009. From there, settlers quickly established a foothold by creating makeshift cultural center at the site, putting on lectures, readings and exhibits
Speaking to the AP, Ehud Olmert, the Israeli prime minister at the time the hospital was under discussion, said that was the tipping point.
“Once it is military installation, it is easier than to change its status into a new outpost, a new settlement and so on,” he said.
Olmert said Netanyahu — who has served as prime minister nearly uninterrupted since then — was “committed to entirely different political directions from the ones that I had,” he said. “They didn’t think about cooperation with the Palestinians.”
Palestinians say the land is theirs
The continued legalization of settlements and spiking settler violence — which rose by 27 percent in 2025, according to Israel’s military — have cemented a fearful status quo for West Bank Palestinians.
The land now home to Yatziv was originally owned by Palestinians from Beit Sahour, said the town’s mayor, Elias Isseid.
“These lands have been owned by families from Beit Sahour since ancient times,” he said.
Isseid worries more land loss is to come. Yatziv is the latest in a line of Israeli settlements to pop up around Beit Sahour, all of which are connected by a main highway that runs to Jerusalem without entering Palestinian villages. The new settlement “poses a great danger to our children, our families,” he said.
A bypass road, complete with a new yellow gate, climbs up to Yatziv. The peace park stands empty.