New WHO advice vindicates UK vaccine strategy

The World Health Organization (WHO) has affirmed that the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is safe for all adults. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 11 February 2021
Follow

New WHO advice vindicates UK vaccine strategy

  • British PM welcomes announcement that Oxford jab safe for all adults, second dose should be delayed
  • WHO official: ‘No reason to expect efficacy substantially compromised in older people’

LONDON: New guidance from the World Health Organization (WHO) has affirmed the British view that the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is safe for all adults, and that its second dose should be delayed.

The British strategy, of offering the jab to over 65s and delaying the second dose, was met with skepticism from some EU members, some of whom have banned over 65s from receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine, citing a lack of data proving its efficacy.

But new guidance from a WHO advisory group released on Thursday cited data showing good immune responses from older people from the jab.

“This suggests it is likely that the vaccine will be found to be efficacious in older persons,” the group said. “The trial data indicate that the vaccine is safe for this age group. Taking the totality of available evidence into account, the WHO recommends the vaccine for use in persons aged 65 years and older.”

The group also found that “vaccine efficacy tended to be higher when the interval between doses was longer,” and concluded that other countries should follow Britain’s dosing plans with the jab.

The WHO still says doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine should be given no more than six weeks apart, but added that these guidelines are open to the possibility of revision.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said it was “good to see” the WHO’s judgment, which will be taken as a vindication of the controversial decision to disregard manufacturer advice and delay doses between jabs in order to spread virus protection more widely.

The UK is among the world’s fastest vaccinating countries, having already inoculated over 13 million people, with a strategy of prioritizing the elderly and healthcare workers. 

Prof. Katherine O’Brien, director of the WHO’s immunization department, said: “There is no reason to expect that efficacy is substantially compromised in older people.”

Given that “the over-65s are at the very highest risk of severe disease and death (and we have) a product that has significant efficacy … there is no reason to constrain the AstraZeneca product from a general recommendation,” she added.


Russia’s war footing may remain after Ukraine war, Latvia spy chief warns

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Russia’s war footing may remain after Ukraine war, Latvia spy chief warns

MUNICH: Russia will not end the militarization of its economy after fighting in Ukraine ends, the head of Latvia’s intelligence agency told AFP on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference which ends Sunday.
“The potential aggressiveness of Russia when the Ukraine war stops will depend of many factors: How the war ends, if it’s frozen or not, and if the sanctions remain,” Egils Zviedris, director of the Latvian intelligence service SAB, told AFP.
Some observers believe that Russia has so thoroughly embraced a war economy and full military mobilization that it will be difficult for it to reverse course, and that this could push Moscow to launch further offensives against European territories.
Zviedris said that lifting current sanctions “would allow Russia to develop its military capacities” more quickly.
He acknowledged that Russia has drawn up military plans to potentially attack Latvia and its Baltic neighbors, but also said that “Russia does not pose a military threat to Latvia at the moment.”
“The fact that Russia has made plans to invade the Baltics, as they have plans for many things, does not mean Russia is going to attack,” Zviedris told AFP.
However, the country is subject to other types of threats from Moscow, particularly cyberattacks, according to the agency he leads.
The SAB recently wrote in its 2025 annual report that Russia poses the main cyber threat to Latvia, because of broader strategic goals as well as Latvia’s staunch support of Ukraine.
The threat has “considerably increased” since Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, it said.
The agency has also warned that Russia is seeking to exploit alleged grievances of Russian-speaking minorities in the Baltics — and in Latvia in particular.
Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has repeatedly claimed to be preparing cases against Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia at the UN International Court of Justice over the rights of their Russian-speaking minorities.
“The aim of litigation: to discredit Latvia on an international level and ensure long-term international pressure on Latvia to change its policy toward Russia and the Russian-speaking population,” the report said.
In 2025, approximately 23 percent of Latvia’s 1.8 million residents identified as being of Russian ethnicity, according to the national statistics office.
Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Latvian authorities decided to require Russian speakers residing in the country to take an exam to assess their knowledge of the Latvian language — with those failing at potential risk of deportation.