UK lawyer backs polygraph tests for released terrorists

London Bridge attacker Usman Khan. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 14 December 2020
Follow

UK lawyer backs polygraph tests for released terrorists

  • Jonathan Hall, QC, an independent expert on UK terror law, likens extremists to manipulative sex offenders

LONDON: A British expert on terrorism law has claimed that deradicalization programs for convicted terrorists don’t work, calling them “deceptive” and likening convicted extremists to sex offenders who lie about being reformed to obtain release from prison.

The intervention comes against the backdrop of the UK attempting to introduce greater powers for authorities to monitor terrorists and extremists after they are released from prison.

Jonathan Hall, QC, told The Times that the public should be under “no illusion” that schemes to rehabilitate dangerous jihadists would be effective, saying there was no evidence to suggest they had much effect.

Hall, an independent reviewer of UK terror legislation, added that those released from prison should be placed under constant supervision and backed the government’s plans to ensure those released are subjected to regular lie-detection tests, or polygraphs, amid a raft of other measures.

“Terrorists are deceptive like sex offenders,” he told The Times. “It’s well documented — you get people who will say things just because they know that’s what people want to hear. And this is a really tricky issue.

“There is no magic bullet, there is no special pill you can take that deradicalizes people, whether they’re coming back from overseas from Syria, or whether they’re being released from prison,” he continued. “It’s a pretty difficult, complex and fraught process. You can’t tell the public that you can place someone with a theological mentor, and they’ll come out the other side. It’s far more difficult than that.”

But Hall dismissed the idea that all convicted extremists were beyond hope of redemption.

“I can see why people try, because if you didn’t try, it would be throwing away all hope, and these offenders are also subjected to some pretty major restrictions, so it’s worth giving them an opportunity to change,” he added. “And there will be some who will change, but you should be under no illusions: It is not some automatic process. And in many cases, it simply won’t work. It doesn’t mean it’s not worth trying.”

The UK has struggled in recent years with the issue of what to do with jihadists, from returning members of the militant group Daesh, such as Shamima Begum, to domestic terrorists.

In 2019, Usman Khan stabbed two people to death on London Bridge, the site of a previous terrorist attack in 2017, before being shot by police. He was out of prison on license, and had been on the UK’s Desistance and Disengagement Programme (DDP), which included theological support and regular access to a psychologist.

Alongside the DDP, which is considered the most thorough program, the UK has two further deradicalization programs: Prevent, which seeks to stop people from becoming radicalized, and Channel, for those in the early stages of becoming extremists.

In February, Sudesh Amman stabbed two people in Streatham, south London, before being shot, having also been released on license following conviction for terror offenses, but was still deemed dangerous enough to warrant constant police monitoring.

After the Streatham attack, the UK government introduced the Terrorist Offenders Act the same month, to make it more difficult for convicted terrorists to be released. 


Trump threatens to halt US trade with Spain over military bases, defense spending

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Trump threatens to halt US trade with Spain over military bases, defense spending

  • The US relocated 15 aircraft, including refueling tankers, from the Rota and Moron military bases in southern Spain after the country’s Socialist leadership said it would not allow them to be used to attack Iran
  • Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, one ​of a dwindling number of left-leaning voices in Europe, has ​risked Trump’s ire with a series of other policy moves, including refusing to let vessels transporting weapons to Israel dock in Spain

WASHINGTON/MADRID: US President Donald Trump threatened to impose a full US trade embargo on Spain on Tuesday ​after the European and NATO ally refused to let the US military use its bases for missions linked to strikes on Iran.
“Spain has been terrible,” Trump told reporters during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, adding that he had told Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to “cut off all dealings” with Spain.
“We’re going to cut off all trade with Spain. We don’t want anything to do with Spain,” he added.
The US relocated 15 aircraft, including refueling tankers, from the Rota and Moron military bases in southern Spain after the country’s Socialist leadership said it would not allow them to be used to attack Iran.
Trump again referenced Spain’s refusal to heed US calls for all NATO members to spend 5 percent of their GDP on defense, and added: “Spain has absolutely nothing that we need.”
“All business having to do ‌with Spain, I ‌have the right to stop it. Embargoes — do anything I want with it — and ​we ‌may ⁠do that with ​Spain,” ⁠he said, again expressing his frustration with the Supreme Court’s ruling last month that his broadest global tariffs were illegal under a national emergencies law.

NO SEPARATE TREATMENT FOR SPAIN
Merz, speaking with reporters after the meeting, said he told Trump privately that Spain could not be excluded from a trade agreement reached between Brussels and Washington last year.
“I said that Spain is a member of the European Union and we negotiate about tariffs with the United States only together or not at all,” he said. “There is no way to treat Spain particularly badly.”
Trump publicly asked Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer their opinions on cutting off Spanish trade.
“Well, sir, I think we’ll talk about it with you,” Greer said. “We know ⁠you can use it, and if you need to use it to assure national and economic ‌security, we’ll do it.”
Bessent said the Supreme Court affirmed Trump’s embargo powers under the ‌International Emergency Economic Powers Act, adding that the USTR and Commerce Department would ​begin investigations into how to penalize Spain under other trade laws.

HIGH BAR
Jennifer ‌Hillman, a trade law professor at Georgetown University, said the Supreme Court did not address the president’s ability to impose a trade ‌embargo under IEEPA. Trump could do so, but he would have to declare a national emergency over Spain as an “unusual and extraordinary” threat to the United States, she said, adding that such a move would go “well beyond” any previous emergency.
“It’s hard to see, however, how Spain denying us the use of air bases on its territory for us to launch an unprovoked attack on Iran poses ‘an unusual and extraordinary threat’ to our national security or foreign ‌policy,” added Peter Shane, a New York University adjunct law professor.

SPAIN RESPONDS
The Spanish government responded in a statement that the US must be mindful of the autonomy of private businesses, international law ⁠and bilateral trade agreements between ⁠the US and the European Union.
Madrid said it had the necessary resources to contain the potential impact of a trade embargo and support affected sectors, but said it would continue to push for free trade and economic cooperation with its partners.
Spain is the world’s top exporter of olive oil and also sells auto parts, steel and chemicals to the United States, but is less vulnerable to Trump’s threats of economic punishment than other European nations.
The US had a trade surplus with Spain for the fourth year in a row in 2025, at $4.8 billion, according to US Census Bureau data, with US exports of $26.1 billion and imports of $21.3 billion. US exports of crude oil and liquefied natural gas to Spain have grown in recent years.
Merz said pressure was being brought to bear on Spain from within Europe on defense spending.
“We are trying to convince Spain to catch up with the 3 percent or 3.5 percent which we agreed on in NATO,” he said, adding later that Spain’s defense spending levels had nothing to do with the trade negotiations.
Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, one ​of a dwindling number of left-leaning voices in Europe, has ​risked Trump’s ire with a series of other policy moves, including refusing to let vessels transporting weapons to Israel dock in Spain.