Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to hold weekly classes as schools shut across Pakistan over COVID-19 fears

Students wearing facemasks attend a class at a school in Peshawar on September 15, 2020. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 26 November 2020
Follow

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to hold weekly classes as schools shut across Pakistan over COVID-19 fears

  • The provision is meant for those institutes that cannot offer online classes, says the provincial education minister
  • Students who cannot access online classes may continue to avail boarding facility

ISLAMABAD: All education institutions in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province can call in their students once a week to provide them learning material and teaching assistance, said a provincial minister on Wednesday, if these institutes lack necessary facilities to arrange online classes.
Addressing a news conference in Peshawar, KP’s education minister, Shahram Tarakai, said that the assignments given to students would be evaluated and count toward their final grade at the end of the academic year.
Pakistan decided to shut all education institutions earlier this week amid the rising number of coronavirus infections in the country.
The decision was taken in a meeting of education ministers that was arranged to decide the future strategy as the second wave of the pandemic sweeps the country.
Federal Minister for Education Shafqat Mahmood asked all education institutions to give their students “homework online,” though he added that the provincial administrations could decide their course of action wherever it was not possible.
KP’s provincial education minister said on Wednesday that schools would remain closed for students from November 26 to December 23, though school staff would remain available to facilitate home-based learning of their students.
He continued that all boarding schools would shift to online lessons, adding that a maximum of 30 percent students, who lack the facility to take online classes, would be accommodated by these institutions.
Tarakai maintained that schools that continued to offer boarding facility to their students would also be responsible to ensure strict adherence to officially prescribed safety measures to prevent the spread of the virus.
 


Pakistan rejects India’s ‘irresponsible assertions’ after FM Jaishankar’s ‘bad neighbors’ remarks

Updated 03 January 2026
Follow

Pakistan rejects India’s ‘irresponsible assertions’ after FM Jaishankar’s ‘bad neighbors’ remarks

  • Indian FM Jaishankar accused Pakistan of fomenting militancy, backed New Delhi’s decision to put Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance
  • Islamabad calls the remarks an attempt to deflect attention from India’s ‘troubling record as a neighbor,’ vows to safeguard rights

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Saturday rejected “irresponsible assertions” made by Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar after his remarks about “bad neighbors” and the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) between the two countries.

Jaishankar mentioned about “bad neighbors” at an event in Madras on Friday and said that New Delhi had a right to defend itself. “When you have bad neighbors... if you look to the one to the West, if a country decides that they will deliberately, persistently, unrepentantly continue with terrorism, we have a right to defend our people,” he was quoted as saying by The Hindu newspaper.

The remarks came months after New Delhi blamed Pakistan for a militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir and conducted missile strikes inside Pakistan. Islamabad, which denied involvement in the Kashmir attack, responded to the strikes, leading to a four-day military conflict that saw the use of armed drones, fighter jets and artillery between the neighbors in May.

In a statement, Pakistani foreign office spokesman Tahir Andrabi said Islamabad firmly rejects the irresponsible assertions made by the Indian external affairs minister, describing the remarks as an attempt to deflect attention from India’s own “troubling record as a neighbor that promotes terrorism and contributes to regional instability.”

“India’s documented involvement in promoting terrorist activities in the region, particularly in Pakistan, is well known. The case of Commander Kulbhushan Jadhav remains a stark example of organized, state-sponsored terrorism directed against Pakistan,” he said.

“Equally concerning are recurring instances of extraterritorial killings, sabotage through proxies, and covert support to terrorist networks.”

Jadhav, an Indian navy officer who Islamabad said had been working with Indian spy agency, RAW, when Pakistani agencies arrested him in Balochistan in 2016. He was later sentenced to death by a Pakistani military court for alleged espionage. India disputes the conviction and has challenged it at the International Court of Justice.

Pakistan and India routinely accuse each other of supporting militant groups waging attacks against the other. The two countries have fought multiple wars, including two of them over the disputed region of Kashmir, since their independence from British rule in 1947. Both rule the region in part but claim it in full.

Jaishankar also spoke on Friday about the IWT that divides control of the Indus basin rivers between the neighbors and ensures water for 80 percent of Pakistani farms. India announced in April, following the Kashmir attack, that it was putting the 1960 World Bank-mediated treaty in abeyance.

“Many years ago, we agreed to a water-sharing arrangement — the belief was it was gesture of goodwill — because of good neighborliness we were doing it … but if you have decades of terrorism, there is no good neighborliness and you don’t get the benefit of good neighborliness,” Jaishankar was quoted as saying.

Pakistan foreign office spokesman Andrabi said the IWT is an international agreement concluded in good faith and at a considerable cost.

“Any unilateral violation of the Treaty by India would undermine regional stability and call into question its credibility as a state that claims to respect international legal obligations,” he said.

“Pakistan will take all necessary measures to safeguard its legitimate rights under the Treaty.”