Government should not impose moral codes on TV serials, films — Pakistan information minister 

Pakistan’s Minister for Information and Broadcasting Shibli Faraz during an interview with Arab News in Islamabad on May 14, 2020. (AN photo)
Short Url
Updated 20 October 2020
Follow

Government should not impose moral codes on TV serials, films — Pakistan information minister 

  • Shibli Faraz says not all content on TikTok ‘inappropriate’ but mechanism needed to filter ‘objectionable’ material 
  • Says content of films and dramas should not “damage our religious and cultural standards”

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani information minister Shibli Faraz has said the government should not set moral codes for TV shows and films, but productions should not defy the Muslim country’s religious and cultural norms.

The minister’s comments come amid a push by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority to censor TV serials.

No drama would be banned, Faraz said in an interview to Arab News, if it followed “norms and standards of [the] family system in Pakistan along with religious restrictions and guidance.”

When asked if the government planned to announce moral codes for TV channels and production houses, he said: “I personally believe that the government should not go to these lengths,” but added that films and dramas should not “damage our religious and cultural standards.” 

“We need films on and around the lives of historical heroes of this region, so that cinema becomes not only a source of promoting our history but also an inspiration for youth,” the minister said. 

Speaking about a recent ban imposed on social media application TikTok, Faraz said the blockade was temporary but the government needed to put in place a mechanism to ensure ‘objectionable’ content was filtered out for Pakistani viewers. 

Pakistan’s telecom regulator blocked TikTok earlier this month for what it said was its failure to filter out “immoral and indecent” content. The application was unbanned on Monday. 

“The issue is that if something is used in a wrong way, everyone related to it has to face the consequences,” Faraz said. “I don’t think that entire content on the app was inappropriate.”

He added: “But before reopening the app, the government wants to make sure that there is a certain mechanism … that barred the objectionable content from the reach of everyone.”

The TikTok ban was imposed in view of “complaints from different segments of the society against immoral and indecent content on the video sharing application,” the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) had said in a statement, adding that it would review its ban subject to a satisfactory mechanism by TikTok to moderate unlawful content.
 


Pakistan high court pauses tree-cutting in Islamabad until Feb. 2

Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan high court pauses tree-cutting in Islamabad until Feb. 2

  • Islamabad High Court asks CDA to ‘explain and justify’ tree-cutting at next hearing
  • CDA officials say 29,000 trees were cut due to allergies, deny felling in green belts

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court has ordered an immediate halt to tree-cutting in the federal capital until Feb. 2, seeking justification from civic authorities over the legality of a large-scale felling drive that has seen thousands of trees removed in recent months.

The interim order, issued by a single-judge bench led by Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro, came during proceedings on a petition challenging the Capital Development Authority’s (CDA) tree-cutting operations in Islamabad’s Shakarparian area and H-8 sector.

At the outset of the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel argued that trees were being felled in violation of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997, the Islamabad Wildlife Ordinance 1979 and the city’s master plan.

“Respondents shall not cut trees till the next date of hearing,” Justice Soomro said in the court order released on Friday while referring to CDA officials.

“Respondents are directed to come fully prepared and to file paragraph-wise comments before the next date of hearing, along with a comprehensive report explaining the justification and legal basis for the cutting of trees,” he added.

According to the court order, the petitioner maintained that the CDA had not made any public disclosure regarding the legal basis for the operation and that the felling was causing environmental harm.

The petition sought access to the official record of tree-cutting activities and called for the penalization of CDA officials responsible for the act under relevant criminal and environmental laws.

It also urged the court to impose a moratorium on infrastructure projects in Islamabad, order large-scale replanting as compensation and constitute a judicial commission headed by a retired Supreme Court judge to probe the alleged violations.

CDA officials acknowledge around 29,000 paper mulberry trees have been cut in the capital in recent months, arguing that the species triggers seasonal allergies such as sneezing, itchy eyes and nasal congestion.

They also maintain that no trees have been removed from designated green belts and that the number of replacement trees planted exceeds those felled.

Designed in the 1960s by Greek architect Constantinos Doxiadis, Islamabad was conceived as a low-density city with green belts and protected natural zones at its core.

Critics, however, say the recent felling has extended beyond paper mulberry trees and question whether authorities are adhering to the city’s master plan and the legal protections governing forested and green areas.

The court has adjourned its hearing until Feb. 2, 2026.