Ruled out: East India Company which once owned India now owned by Indian

The entrance to East India Company's flagship store in Mayfair, London, on September 4, 2020. (AN photo by Saadia Gardezi)
Short Url
Updated 08 September 2020
Follow

Ruled out: East India Company which once owned India now owned by Indian

  • In 2010, Sanjiv Mehta relaunched the East India Company as a consumer brand selling luxury teas, coffees, and food
  • For 250 years, the Company dominated the Indian subcontinent, seizing by brute military force great chunks of the Mughal Empire

LONDON: The East India Company name is synonymous with the colonial exploitation of South Asia, including the Indian Subcontinent, since the 1600s. Today, in one of the great ironies of history, the Company is owned by an Indian.
Founded in London in 1600 to pursue trade in spices, the East India Company was authorized by its charter to wage war. In the next 250 years, it dominated the Indian subcontinent and used brute military force to conquer large chunks of the Mughal Empire, including India, present day Pakistan and Bangladesh and half of Afghanistan.




East India Company seal from the 1600's in use on merchandise today at the East Indian Company store in London, on September 4, 2020. (AN photo by Saadia Gardezi)

But the Company was disbanded after soldiers of the company’s own army rose in rebellion against the British in 1857.
A tiny shadow of the company persisted: the trading name and a small tea and coffee concern.
In 2005, Indian businessman Sanjiv Mehta acquired the company and turned it into a consumer brand focused on luxury teas, coffees, and food.




Sanjiv Metha, chairman and CEO of the East India Company, poses for a photograph in London on September 4, 2020. On the wall behind him displayed is the original coat of arms of the East India Company. (AN photo by Saadia Gardezi)

“A company which once owned India is now owned by an Indian ... a feeling of the empire striking back,” Mehta, who opened his first store in 2010 in London’s affluent Mayfair area, told Arab News.
When he learnt that the company’s shares were up for sale, he said he had to own them, “no matter the cost.”
Today, Metha has the license to trade under the coat of arms and seal of the historic company. He also has the rights to mint coins, including one mohur gold coin that was last minted in 1918 in British India.
As an Indian familiar with the history of the Company’s aggressive trade policies and exploitation of the Indian Subcontinent, buying the shares meant emotional closure for Mehta, he said at the East India Company store, its shelves lined with teas and coffees from India, China, Africa, and everywhere in-between.




Luxury teas on display at the East India Company in Mayfair, London, on September 4, 2020. (AN photo by Saadia Gardezi)

“This avatar of the East India Company is based on the idea of unity in diversity,” Metha said. “We are taking all the good forward and leaving the bad behind. The previous company was built on aggression, this company is built on compassion.”
In 1600, Queen Elizabeth I granted over 200 English merchants the right to trade in the East Indies to compete against Dutch traders. They became known as the East India Company and by the 18th century dominated the global textile trade, with an army to protect their interests.
Most of the forces were based at three main “stations” in India: Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta.




Golden coins from the time of the British Raj, reminted by the East India Company, on display at its shop in London's Mayfair on September 4, 2020. (AN photo by Saadia Gardezi)

In 1857, Indian soldiers revolted against the British and the Company’s territorial and economic control was shifted to the British government. What remained was a small tea and coffee concern and trademarks.
In 1874, the East India Company dissolved.
But can a company with a dark history of colonial exploitation be rehabilitated? Metha certainly thinks so.
“We were worried about some of the reactions that might come out of it being the colonizer,” he said. “But due to the fact that the one who was colonized bought the company, the story is extremely positively received by the Indian Subcontinent.”


At least 13 civilians killed in Pakistan strikes in Afghanistan, UN says

Updated 23 February 2026
Follow

At least 13 civilians killed in Pakistan strikes in Afghanistan, UN says

  • Pakistan said it launched the strikes after blaming recent suicide attacks on militants operating from Afghan territory
  • The reported toll adds to fears of a renewed cycle of retaliation between the neighbors, threatening a fragile ceasefire

ISLAMABAD/KABUL: At least 13 civilians ‌were killed and seven injured in Pakistani airstrikes in eastern Afghanistan, the United Nations said on Monday, as cross-border tensions escalated following a string ​of suicide bombings in Pakistan.

The reported toll adds to fears of a renewed cycle of retaliation between the neighbors, threatening a fragile ceasefire along their 2,600-km (1,600-mile) frontier and further straining ties as both sides trade blame over militant violence.

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) said it had received “credible reports” that overnight Pakistani airstrikes on February 21–22 killed at least 13 ‌civilians and injured ‌seven in the Behsud and Khogyani ​districts ‌of ⁠Nangarhar province.

Taliban ​spokesman Zabihullah ⁠Mujahid earlier reported dozens killed or wounded in the strikes, which also hit locations in Paktika province. Reuters could not independently verify the reported toll.

Pakistan said it launched the strikes after blaming recent suicide attacks, including during Ramadan, on militants operating from Afghan territory.

Pakistan’s information ministry in a post on X said ⁠the “intelligence-based” operation struck seven camps of the Pakistani Taliban ‌and Daesh (Islamic State) Khorasan Province ‌and that it had “conclusive evidence” the militant ​assaults on Pakistan were directed ‌by “Afghanistan-based leadership and handlers.”

Kabul has repeatedly denied allowing militants ‌to use Afghan territory to launch attacks in Pakistan.

The strikes took place days after Kabul released three Pakistani soldiers in a Saudi-mediated exchange aimed at easing months of tensions along the border.

Afghanistan’s defense ministry condemned ‌the strikes and called them a violation of sovereignty and international law, saying an “appropriate and measured ⁠response will ⁠be taken at a suitable time.” The Afghan foreign ministry said it had summoned Pakistan’s ambassador.

In a statement on the February 21-22 strikes, Afghanistan’s education ministry said eight school students; five boys and three girls, were killed in Behsud in Nangarhar province, and one madrasa student injured in Barmal in Paktika province, adding that dozens of other civilians were killed or wounded and educational centers destroyed. Reuters could not independently verify the information.

The latest strikes follow months of clashes and repeated border closures ​that have disrupted trade ​and movement along the rugged frontier.