UK government wins bid for Supreme Court to hear ‘Daesh bride’ Shamima Begum’s case

Begum, 20, who is currently marooned in a Syrian refugee camp, lost the first stage of her case about the legality of the government’s decision at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) in February. (Screenshot/ITV News)
Short Url
Updated 31 July 2020
Follow

UK government wins bid for Supreme Court to hear ‘Daesh bride’ Shamima Begum’s case

  • Home Office successfully appealed a lower court ruling this month which would have allowed Shamima Begum, 20, to return to Britain

LONDON: The UK government on Friday won a bid for the Supreme Court to decide if a woman stripped of her citizenship after joining the Daesh group in Syria can return to fight the decision.
The Home Office successfully appealed a lower court ruling this month which would have allowed Shamima Begum, 20, to return to Britain to pursue her appeal.
Begum, 20, who is currently marooned in a Syrian refugee camp, lost the first stage of her case about the legality of the government’s decision at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) in February.
However, the tribunal also ruled she could not have a “fair and effective appeal” or play “any meaningful part” in the process, as she was living in a Syrian refugee camp.
Three senior judges at the Court of Appeal upheld that SIAC ruling on July 16, concluding Begum should be allowed to come to Britain for the legal challenge.

-----

READ MORE: Daughter of beheaded aid worker says Shamima Begum a ‘ticking time bomb’

UK teen Shamima Begum was strict enforcer under Daesh ‘morality police’

-----

They ruled “fairness and justice” outweighed any national security concerns, which “could be addressed and managed if she returns.”
But judge Eleanor King, one of that trio, said at a remote hearing Friday that the country’s highest court should now consider a case that raised “points of law of general public importance.”
Begum was 15 when she and two other schoolgirls from Bethnal Green in east London left home to join the group on February 17, 2015.
She claims she married a Dutch convert soon after arriving in Daesh-held territory. She was discovered, nine months pregnant, in a Syrian refugee camp in February last year.
Her newborn baby died soon after she gave birth. Two of her other children also died under Daesh rule.
The then-home secretary, Sajid Javid, annulled Begum’s British citizenship on national security grounds after an outcry led by right-wing media.
That prompted her to take legal action, arguing the decision was unlawful, made her stateless and exposed her to the risk of death or inhuman and degrading treatment.
British-born Begum is of Bangladeshi heritage. But Bangladesh’s foreign minister has said he would not consider granting her citizenship.


Political stability at stake as Malaysia’s Najib awaits verdict in biggest 1MDB trial

Updated 13 sec ago
Follow

Political stability at stake as Malaysia’s Najib awaits verdict in biggest 1MDB trial

  • A Malaysian high court will decide on Friday whether to convict Najib of four more charges of corruption and 21 counts of money laundering involving the illegal transfer of about 2.2 billion ringgit ($539 million) from 1MDB

KUALA LUMPUR: Jailed former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak will hear a verdict ​on Friday in the biggest trial he faces over the multibillion-dollar 1MDB scandal, a ruling that could risk deepening tensions within the administration of current premier Anwar Ibrahim.
Investigators have said about $4.5 billion was allegedly stolen from 1Malaysia Development Berhad, a state fund co-founded by Najib in 2009, and that more than $1 billion allegedly made its way into his personal bank accounts. Najib, 72, last year apologized for mishandling the scandal while in office but he has consistently denied wrongdoing, saying he was misled by 1MDB officials and a fugitive ‌financier, Jho Low, on ‌the source of the funds. In 2020, Najib was ‌convicted ⁠of ​graft and ‌money laundering for illegally receiving funds from a 1MDB unit and began a 12-year prison sentence two years later after losing all his appeals. That sentence was later halved by a pardons board chaired by Malaysia’s king, with Najib due for release in 2028.
A Malaysian high court will decide on Friday whether to convict Najib of four more charges of corruption and 21 counts of money laundering involving the illegal transfer of about 2.2 billion ringgit ($539 million) from 1MDB.
If ⁠found guilty, he could face maximum jail terms of between 15 and 20 years on each charge, as ‌well as a fine of up to five times the ‍value of the alleged misappropriations.
The implementation ‍of the penalties, however, could be stayed pending further appeals.

VERDICTS TEST GOVERNMENT STABILITY

The decision ‍will be closely watched after another court this week dismissed a bid by Najib to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest.
That ruling reignited tensions in Anwar’s ruling administration, which includes Najib’s party, the United Malays National Organization.
UMNO campaigned against Anwar in a 2022 election but joined his coalition ​to form a government after the poll ended in a hung parliament.
Several UMNO leaders expressed disappointment with the decision to deny Najib house arrest, ⁠saying it risked diluting the powers of Malaysia’s rulers, while others were angered by social media posts by some members of Anwar’s coalition celebrating the ruling.
Anwar this week called for all parties to handle news of the verdict with patience and wisdom, adding that it was “inappropriate to muddy the atmosphere or add tension” even if there were those who chose not to sympathize with Najib and his family. A guilty verdict for Najib on Friday could strain ties further, with some UMNO leaders already calling for the party to review its pact with Anwar or withdraw from the government altogether. An acquittal, however, may weaken Anwar, who has been under pressure to uphold his credentials as an anti-graft campaigner. Anwar has been accused by critics of ‌betraying progressive voters and allies after prosecutors dropped some corruption charges against Najib and other UMNO figures. The premier has repeatedly said he does not interfere in court cases.