Animal rights activists condemn culling practices for stray dogs in Karachi

A stray dog on a street as people line up maintaining social distancing to buy groceries from a governmental subsidized shop during a nationwide lockdown in Karachi in April. (Files/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 July 2020
Follow

Animal rights activists condemn culling practices for stray dogs in Karachi

  • Officials say thousands of stray canines killed so far in the city initiative

KARACHI: The frequent culling of dogs in Pakistan has angered both animal rights activists and citizens, but officials in Sindh province say it is necessary because packs of wild strays pose a threat to residents, with up to 5,000 people dying of rabies every year.

However, experts aren’t convinced.

Last Tuesday, Dr.  Naseem Salahuddin, the head of the Rabies Free Pakistan (RFP) project, woke up to discover that months of work by her team to vaccinate and neuter stray dogs in Karachi, the capital of Sindh, had been thrown away.

Overnight, municipal authorities in an upscale neighborhood in southern Karachi had killed at least 50 strays that Salahuddin’s team had treated. And this was not the first time this had happened.

Authorities estimate the citywide operation has culled thousands of dogs by shooting or using poison tablets hidden in food but do not have a full count for all six districts that make up Karachi city.

“You work from dawn to dusk, put in your best effort, spend time and resources, and they kill the dogs without any reason — it’s like being stabbed in the back,” said Salahuddin.

Officials say it is part of the city’s anti-rabies measures, mainly since vaccines for the disease, mostly imported from India, always seem to be in short supply at Karachi hospitals.

Rabies is a neglected disease in Pakistan, with scant data available, although the cases of dog bites are rising, doctors and officials said.

Around 150 patients come to Karachi hospitals daily with dog bites, doctors said. Indus Hospital treated more than 7,000 cases of dog bites last year and said it had already handled 4,000 cases this year. Dr Seemin Jamali, executive director of Jinnah Hospital, the largest health facility in Sindh, said the hospital treated 6,000 patients for dog bites between January and July.

Street animals, particularly dogs, are often a part of the urban landscape in developing countries such as Pakistan. In Karachi, a city of more than 15 million, it is common to see strays lurking in public parks, guarding street corners and howling in neighborhoods at night. Joggers say they have to carry a stick to scare dogs away, and cyclists keep stones in their pockets to throw at chasers.

Malik Fayyaz, the chairman of the district municipal council in southern Karachi, confirmed that authorities were killing, as well as sterilizing, dogs due to a rising number of complaints from residents.

He said a vaccination and spaying project the council had started in collaboration with Indus Hospital had stalled due to the coronavirus pandemic, and culling strays was the only option.

Another program launched last year in Karachi’s district central, the largest municipal cooperation in the city, had also stalled.

Rehan Hashmi, the central district council chairman, said dogs had to be taken off the streets even if that meant killing them. Authorities would stop killing dogs, he added, if there was a program that could vaccinate and spay “100 percent stray dogs.”

“Saving a human life is more important than saving the life of a dog,” Hashmi said.

In August 2016, the district council of south Karachi killed 800 stray dogs, pushing lawyer Muhammad Asad Iftikhar to file a petition in the Sindh High Court. Last December, the court finally directed authorities to stop culling animals and instead to neuter and vaccinate them. But cull tactics continue.

Last month, the Ayesha Chundrigar Foundation (ACF), which has neutered more than 6,000 stray animals in Karachi in the past seven years, filed a petition in the Sindh High Court after hundreds of dogs the organisation had vaccinated and spayed were found dead. Many of the dogs were given poisoned food, the Foundation said, and were found with their legs tied to other dogs so they could not run away or seek help as the venom took effect.

The ACF petition, which is yet to be heard in court, is seeking a uniform policy by the government to curb the spread of rabies and contain rising stray populations in Sindh instead of sentencing dogs to death.

In Pakistan, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1890 was amended in January 2018 to include fines and punishments for animal abuse. The law does not provide a “holistic approach” towards animal welfare, rights activists say, and needs to be replaced with new legislation recognising animals as sentient beings that need protection and care.

Animal welfare advocates say Pakistan has never made a priority of pushing responsible animal control policies, including spaying and neutering, which would have helped avoid the current problems.

“Killing dogs is not only inhumane but ineffective also,” said Aftab Gauhar, a project manager at RFP, a project of Karachi’s Indus Hospital which operates across the city and has vaccinated nearly 24,000 dogs and neutered and spayed over 3,500 since 2018. She said rising dog populations and rabies infections could be tackled with sterilization, mass vaccination drives and community engagement to teach people how to behave around strays.

There are currently several charities in Karachi who cruise the city treating sick dogs and taking healthy ones to shelters for vaccinations and sterilizations before depositing them back exactly where they were found: on the streets.

Chundrigar, who founded ACF, said sterilization could lead to a 50 percent fall in the number of strays within a year.

“Stray dogs should be neutered and left to live in their natural habitats, which are the streets,” she said.

In an emotional video message posted online last month after hundreds of dogs were found dead, Chundrigar said: 

“We [ACF] are about to complete seven years next month. It has been a hard seven years. We feel grieved. We have no success to show. Because all of our success stories are dead.”


Venezuelans divided on Machado peace prize, return home

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Venezuelans divided on Machado peace prize, return home

CARACAS: Venezuelans stood divided Wednesday on the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to opposition leader Maria Corina Machado and on whether she should return home from Oslo.
Supporters were hopeful she will come back to continue leading the political resistance to President Nicolas Maduro, whose last two re-elections were widely dismissed as fraudulent.
But detractors labeled her a traitor for backing US actions against Maduro’s regime, and said she would be better off in exile.
Machado, who had been in hiding in Venezuela for over a year after Maduro’s disputed July 2024 re-election, traveled to Norway but missed the Nobel ceremony.
Her daughter Ana Corina Sosa Machado accepted the peace prize on her behalf Wednesday.
Nobel officials said Machado was “safe” and would reach Oslo by Thursday at the latest, when she is to hold a press conference.
Her daughter has insisted Machado would return to Venezuela despite arrest fears. Machado’s former campaign manager also insisted there was “no chance” of her taking up exile.
Alirio Villegas, a 78-year-old pensioner in Caracas, told AFP if it were him, he would stay away.
“It’s hard to see her coming back. This country is tough,” he said. “But she has to return... she’s the one leading us. If she leaves, what will we do? She’s the one the country wants.”
For Jazmin Briceno, a 45-year-old teacher, the peace prize was “a good step forward” for Venezuela even as it contends with an economic crisis, mass emigration and fears of US military action against leftist Maduro.
“She’s Venezuelan and she has the right to come back; they can’t prevent it. We’re waiting for her here,” Briceno told AFP.

‘Mother of our country’

Outside city hall in Oslo, where the Nobel ceremony took place, there was a festive atmosphere as exiled Venezuelans gathered from around Europe and as far as Qatar to celebrate Machado’s win.
Draped in the Venezuelan flag, they embraced and cheered as they tried to get closer to Machado’s daughter and two sisters who had made the trip.
“It’s been a great honor to be here and celebrate Maria Corina: a heroine, a mother of our country,” pianist and composer Gabriela Montero told AFP after moving guests to tears with a popular song from her country, “Mi querencia,” weaving in notes of the national anthem.
But the Norwegian Peace Council, an NGO grouping, distanced itself from the ceremony, concerned about Machado’s failure to condemn a US military deployment in the Caribbean.
US strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats have killed dozens, including fishermen, according to their families and governments.
Back in Caracas, too, there were critics.
Administrative assistant Abigail Castillo, 24, told AFP it was “a true disgrace that they gave the prize to that woman who has sought genocide...and a blockade of our country.”
Castillo hoped Machado would not return, predicting that: “Like a thief, she’ll stay hidden, living in fear of the strength of every Venezuelan defending our homeland.”
The Maduro government also criticized the prize, which Vice President Delcy Rodriguez described as “blood-stained” due to Machado’s support of US military action.
Rodriguez likened the Oslo ceremony to a wake, saying: “The show flopped, the lady didn’t show up.”
At a rally on Wednesday, Maduro told supporters that Venezuela was demanding an end to “the illegal and brutal interventionism of the United States.”
But for some in Caracas, politics and prizes are not top of mind.
“You don’t get to eat because Maria Corina won a prize,” said 32-year-old carpenter Josmar Rodriguez.