Social media users demand ‘Palestine’ added to Google Maps

The viral post claimed the label for Palestine has been removed and people shared posts saying they were angered that there was “No Palestine” on both Apple and Google maps. (Screengrab)
Short Url
Updated 20 July 2020
Follow

Social media users demand ‘Palestine’ added to Google Maps

CAIRO: A post going viral among Arab social media users Thursday accused Google of removing Palestine from all online maps.
The users shared screenshots of Google Maps that show an outline of the map with the labels for “West Bank” and “Gaza Strip” as well as “Israel” labeled alongside them. 
The viral post claimed the label for Palestine has been removed and people shared posts saying they were angered that there was “No Palestine” on both Apple and Google maps.
However, in 2016, when users claimed the same thing, Google responded saying the name Palestine has never existed on its maps. 
A Google spokeswoman said at the time: “There has never been a ‘Palestine’ label on Google Maps.”
A spokeswoman said there was a bug that removed the label for “West Bank and “Gaza.” 
“We’re working quickly to bring these labels back to the area,” she said. 
The move comes while Israel President Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged to annex parts of the occupied West Bank.
The threat has triggered global criticism with many countries calling it ‘human rights violation’.

 

 


Dutch couple’s marriage annulled due to ChatGPT speech

Updated 09 January 2026
Follow

Dutch couple’s marriage annulled due to ChatGPT speech

  • The pair said “I do” and the officiant declared them “not only husband and wife, but above all a team”
  • The judge ⁠found that they had not actually sworn to fulfil their marriage duties

AMSTERDAM: A Dutch couple had their marriage annulled after the person officiating used a ChatGPT-generated speech that was intended to be playful but failed to meet legal requirements, according to a court ruling published this week.
The pair from the city of Zwolle, whose names were redacted from the January 5 decision under Dutch ⁠privacy rules, argued that they had intended to marry regardless of whether the right wording was used when they took their vows.
According to the decision, the person officiating their ceremony last April ⁠19 asked whether they would “continue supporting each other, teasing each other and embracing each other, even when life gets difficult.”
The pair said “I do” and the officiant declared them “not only husband and wife, but above all a team, a crazy couple, each other’s love and home base.”
But the judge ⁠found that they had not actually sworn to fulfil their marriage duties — something that is required under Dutch law.
“The court understands that the date in the marriage deed is important to the man and woman, but cannot ignore what the law says.” It ordered the marriage removed from the Zwolle city registry.