How long will athletes be allowed to take a stand against social injustice?

A new mood has emerged in sport over the last week amid the fallout from the death of African-American George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis. (AFP/Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 03 June 2020
Follow

How long will athletes be allowed to take a stand against social injustice?

  • A new mood has emerged in sport over the last week amid the fallout from the death of African-American George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis

DUBAI: Whoever came up with the fanciful notion of keeping sport and politics separate certainly never lived in the Middle East.

In a region where every aspect of life is shaped by socio-political factors, few sportsmen or women have ever publicly taken ideological stands. Quite literally, their livelihoods, their lives, depend on it.

Look west however, and the situation has for a long time been somewhat more complicated. Sporting figures, with a few easily identifiable exceptions, rarely needed, cared, or were encouraged to make political statements. Even from a position of privilege in societies that pride themselves on free speech.

Historically and in recent times, those who dared take a stand against social injustice were quickly made an example of by authorities.

But a new mood has emerged over the last week as the fallout from the death of African-American George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis continues to be felt on US streets, and on global news and social media networks.

The seeds of the current wave of protests were sewn more than three years ago.

When San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick famously took a knee during the national anthem to protest police brutality against African-Americans, the backlash was more suited to someone who had committed treason than taking a stand against racism.

His protest has proved prophetic, though not without severe personal cost.

For his troubles, Kaepernick was ostracized by the NFL (National Football League) and attacked by conservative media figures and US President Donald Trump himself.

“You have to stand proudly for the national anthem or you shouldn’t be playing, you shouldn’t be there, maybe you shouldn’t be in the country,” said Trump in 2018 after the NFL warned that it would fine any player who followed Kaepernick’s example.

Last year, American soccer superstar Megan Rapinoe echoed Kaepernick’s actions while leading the US Women’s National Team to World Cup glory, again attracting criticism from the likes of Trump and British media figure Piers Morgan.

These remained isolated cases. By and large, athletes, perhaps hoping to avoid similar fates, preferred to keep their heads down, or stuck in the sand as some might say.

Now it is apparent that many athletes will no longer stay silent.

The first to make a stand was German football club Schalke’s US international Weston McKennie who on Saturday wore an armband during the Bundesliga match against Werder Bremen that read, “Justice for George.”

The following day, Marcus Thuram, son of French World Cup winner Lilian, took a knee after scoring for Borussia Monchengladbach against Union Berlin, also in the Bundesliga.

Completing the trio of memorable images was British football player Jadon Sancho who, on the day he scored his first ever professional hat-trick for Borussia Dortmund against Paderborn, lifted his top to reveal a T-shirt sporting the message, “Justice for George Floyd.” For this he received a yellow card, but that did not stop Moroccan team-mate Achraf Hakimi revealing an identical message at full time.

They might have faced sanctions from the German FA, but none of them will be punished. Their actions show that the days when athletes could be silenced with threats of fines or suspensions would seem to be over. Sports are only a small part of life, and players, and seemingly, some sports institutions, are no longer willing to turn their heads.

The outspoken British racing driver Lewis Hamilton has already criticized Formula 1 for its silence over the Floyd-inspired demonstrations and the #BlackLivesMatter campaign.

“I see those of you who are staying silent, some of you the biggest of stars, yet you stay silent in the midst of injustice. Not a sign from anybody in my industry which of course is a white-dominated sport,” the six-time champion posted on his Instagram account.

Former US basketball player Michael Jordan, recently portrayed in the documentary “The Last Dance” as something of an apolitical, self-serving figure, has broken his silence too.

“I stand with those who are calling out the ingrained racism and violence toward people of color in our country. We have had enough,” he said.

In England, many Premier League footballers, arguably the most scrutinized athletes on the planet, have also made their voices heard.

The entire Liverpool squad, led by the likes of Gini Wijnaldum and Virgil van Dijk, took the knee during training, an image that was widely circulated on social media. Chelsea’s players followed suit, lining up in a formation that spelled the letter H, for humanity.

Manchester United’s account also posted an anti-“hatred” message, while their brilliant young striker Marcus Rashford, who had already helped raise more than £20 million ($25.1 million) to feed children during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown, tweeted a message that said: “People are hurting and we need answers. Black lives matter. Black culture matters. Black communities matter. We matter.”

In Italy, former Manchester United and current Inter Milan winger Ashley Young simply posted a screen shot of the words, “Black Lives Matter.” The message was clear, players were no longer tolerating sitting on the fence or hiding behind hollow, if not outright offensive, slogans such as “All Lives Matter.”

In the past, such high-profile activism among athletes was rare, and often brought nothing but trouble, or even ruin, on those who were brave enough to stand up to societal ills.

At the peak of his powers, American boxing great Muhammad Ali lost three years of his career for his conscientious objection to serving in the US Army during the Vietnam War. Sportingly and financially he suffered grave consequences, not to mention having his reputation tarnished by a rabidly nationalistic media. Kaepernick, no doubt, can identify.

Perhaps the most iconic image of activism remains that of Tommie Smith and John Carlos at the 1968 Mexico Olympics giving the symbol of black power as the US national anthem played minutes after they had claimed gold and bronze in the 200 meters race. Both were expelled from the Games, but their legacy is as relevant as ever.

The raised fist salute is now commonly seen among peaceful demonstrators across American cities.

In more recent times, footballers would often lift their shirts to show messages of support for various causes, in the way that Sancho did at the weekend. Almost always, it would lead to censure by FIFA or its member associations.

In 1997, Liverpool forward Robbie Fowler displayed a message of support for sacked dock workers in his hometown, leading to a fine of £900 by UEFA.

After scoring against Deportivo La Coruna in a Copa del Rey match in January 2009, Mali striker Freddie Kanoute revealed a message that simply said “Palestine” in several languages, as Gaza was attacked by Israel. He received a $4,000 fine.

A year earlier, Egypt and Al-Ahly captain Mohamed Aboutrika was booked during a match against Sudan for displaying the words “Sympathize with Gaza,” but was eventually spared punishment by the Confederation of African Football (CAF).

While it was individuals that could be counted on to show solidarity with social causes, it now seems that the tide has turned among official sporting federations, teams, media outlets and advertisers too, all keen to be on the right side of history.

FIFA’s Twitter account briefly posted a photo of Sancho with his message of protest clearly showing, only for it to be deleted later.

And Nike, having commendably stood by Kaepernick with a striking advert in 2018, this week released a short anti-racism message that said, with a nod to its own slogan: “For once, don’t do it.”

All over the world, other brands and social media accounts have been falling over themselves to push the #BlackLivesMatter narrative. This is a welcome development only if it does herald genuine change, and, crucially, is an inclusive message.

But some of the motives should be treated with extreme caution, if not skepticism. Now that these previously silent voices have been seen to take a moral stand, it will be interesting to see whether they maintain their newly found principles or pull them back whenever it suits their purposes.

Whether it is a passing phase remains to be seen.

Will sporting organizations now back their athletes’ right to take the knee and support #BlackLiveMatter indefinitely? Are protests for causes in places such as Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Libya, or Sudan a step too far? And will female voices against gender inequality be tolerated? Where will the line be drawn?

History has not been kind to sportspeople that have raised their voices against injustice.

But now that the genie is out of the bottle, it should be almost unthinkable for authorities and brands to continue pushing the line that sport and politics do not mix; to return to an unenlightened time when their star athletes, the lifeblood of their industries, can be bullied into silence.

But do not bet against them trying just yet.


Al-Nassr down Al-Najma in 5-0 drubbing to move clear at the summit of SPL

Updated 26 February 2026
Follow

Al-Nassr down Al-Najma in 5-0 drubbing to move clear at the summit of SPL

  • Ronaldo, Coman, Martínez and Mané all on the scoresheet in 5-0 victory as Al-Nassr move two points clear of second-place Al-Ahli

DAMMAM: When Al-Najma beat Al-Kholood two weeks ago to secure their first-ever Saudi Pro League victory under new manager Néstor El Maestro, it seemed like a page was turned in their turbulent debut season in the league.

Days later, they led Al-Ahli 1-0 in Jeddah, further showing that this team were not prepared to go down so easily. Unfortunately for the Qassim-based side, they crumbled in the second half and fell to a 4-1 defeat.

Next up for El Maestro’s squad was Al-Nassr. With Al-Hilal dropping points to Al-Taawoun and Al-Ahli beating Damac by the skin of their teeth, this was Jorge Jesus’ chance to reclaim top spot with a two-point gap. There was no option but victory.

Al-Najma were no match for Al-Nassr from the get-go. Only five minutes were needed for fans to complain about the level of refereeing for the third consecutive day, with Al-Nassr winning a penalty just five minutes in.

It wasn’t to be for Al-Najma’s goalkeeper Victor Braga, though. Just last week, he became the first player to save an Ivan Toney penalty in an Al-Ahli shirt.

This time, Cristiano Ronaldo slotted home with confidence, and there was no looking back. Al-Najma accepted defeat with more than 80 minutes to go, and the only question remained was how big the scoreline would be.

With Íñigo Martínez now Jesus’ trusted option at left-back, Marcelo Brozović was afforded greater freedom to push forward. Martinez operated as a pseudo-left-defensive midfielder, giving the Croatian the green light to overload the channels in the final third.

This led to Al-Nassr’s second of the night, when Brozović received the ball down the left flank to square it to Kingsley Coman in the 31st minute. The Frenchman converted his sixth goal of the campaign.

Moments later, Braga was injured while attempting to deal with a corner. Waleed Al-Anzi replaced him, but a low Martinez strike from range deflected off Nasser Al-Haleel to slip between his legs for Al-Nassr’s third in the 42nd minute.

The second half would prove no different for the hosts. Playing higher up the pitch in a bid to lessen the deficit, it saw Nawaf Bu Washl released with acres of space down the right after a chipped ball by Abdullah Al-Khaibari. 

Bu Washl found Ronaldo in the box, but after hesitating to shoot, he opted to release Sadio Mané instead, who netted the fourth in the 52nd minute.

The next 10 minutes saw Ronaldo, Mané, Brozović, Coman and João Félix substituted as Jesus manages the team’s fitness levels. Al-Nassr travel to Al Majma’ah to face Al-Fayha in less than 72 hours.

The icing on the cake came via Martinez in the 80th minute. Abdulrahman Ghareeb delivered a corner to the near post that was met by the Spaniard and headed past Al-Anzi at the far post for Al-Nassr’s fifth.

Eleven games remain for Al-Nassr on their quest for their first league title since 2019. Their next five games include Al-Fayha, NEOM, Al-Khaleej, Al-Najma and Al-Okhdood, a run that helped them solidify top spot in the first half of the season.

That is followed by the stretch that previously saw them go four games without a win: Al-Ettifaq, Al-Ahli, Al-Qadsiah and Al-Hilal, before their final two games of the season against Al-Shabab and Damac.

The title race remains tight. Al-Nassr may sit top, but Al-Ahli, Al-Hilal and Al-Qadsiah sit two, three and five points behind them respectively. Time will tell if Ronaldo can grab the coveted title he’s missed since his arrival in the Kingdom.

Elsewhere, Alexandre Lacazette’s stellar strike was cancelled out by Yassine Benzia in NEOM’s 1-1 draw with Al-Fayha. The newly-promoted side remain in eighth place, five points ahead of Al-Khaleej in ninth, and six behind seventh-placed Al-Ettifaq.

Saudi Pro League action resumes on Thursday. Al-Fateh go head-to-head with Damac while Al-Hazem host Al-Ettifaq. Al-Ahli, despite a few recent struggles, have won 12 out of their last 13 matches and travel to the capital to face Al-Riyadh on the same day.