Christchurch’s Muslim community still nervous, one year after New Zealand mosque shootings

51 Muslims died when a gunman attacked two mosques in Christchurch last year. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 16 March 2020
Follow

Christchurch’s Muslim community still nervous, one year after New Zealand mosque shootings

  • On the first anniversary of the attacks, there are signs the white supremacist movement remains active
  • But the attacks on March 15, 2019 prompted changes to gun laws and social media regulations

DUBAI: One year on from the deadly terrorist attack on Muslim worshippers in Christchurch, New Zealand, many members of the still-jittery community believe progress has been mixed.

The shootings in the largest city in New Zealand’s South Island — at Al-Noor mosque and Linwood Islamic Center during Friday prayers — were allegedly carried out by 29-year-old Australian Brenton Tarrant.
Since then, reforms in gun laws and social media regulations have been introduced, but there is a sense that a white supremacist movement remains active in the country.
Just weeks ahead of the attacks’ first anniversary on March 15, a new threat against one of the two mosques surfaced on social media, prompting fresh investigations by police.
A 19-year-old man was arrested after an image began circulating on an encrypted messaging app of a man sitting in a car outside Al-Noor mosque wearing a balaclava. The image carried a threatening message and a gun emoji.
Responding to the report, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said that she found it hard to believe that New Zealand’s Muslim community was still being subjected to online hate of this kind.
“I will be among many New Zealanders who will be devastated to see that as we head toward the one-year anniversary of a most horrific terror attack on the Muslim community, that they should again be the target of this kind of activity,” she said.
New Zealand police have increased security at the two mosques amid preparations for a memorial service to be attended by senior government officials and community members.
One year ago on Sunday, the alleged gunman made his way to Al-Noor mosque in  suburban Riccarton at 1:40 p.m., broadcasting live footage of the attack on Facebook  before launching a second attack at Linwood Islamic Center about 15 minutes later.

“I will be among many New Zealanders who will be devastated to see that ... the Muslim community should again be the target of this kind of (online hate) activity.”

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

Footage of dead and wounded worshippers lying huddled on the floor was widely circulated on social media along with a published “manifesto” that denounced immigrants, calling them “invaders.”
The attacks were described as “one of New Zealand’s darkest days” by the New Zealand prime minister, who said it was an assault on the nation’s values.
Tarrant has pleaded not guilty to terrorism charges plus 51 counts of murder and 40 of attempted murder and will face trial on June 2.
The threats that the Muslim community in Christchurch have faced are similar to those directed at immigrant communities in many other parts of the world.
“The white nationalist threat is a constant,” Patrick Strickland, a journalist and author of “Alerta! Alerta!,” told Arab News by phone from Athens.
“Without organized pushback, such violence will continue to crop up in places from Christchurch to Hanau to El Paso.”
Strickland said: “Fascism is a political ideology that doesn’t exist without violence, and perpetrators of individual acts of fascist violence feed off each other.”
Unsurprisingly, the Christchurch killings inspired a number of terror attacks in the US and Europe.
Just one month later, a 19-year-old man opened fire on worshippers in a deadly shooting rampage at a southern California synagogue.
In August, a young man carrying several guns was overpowered after firing shots at an Islamic center in Baerum, near Norway’s capital Oslo.
And in October, two people were killed when an armed man opened fire outside a German synagogue on Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the Jewish year, and livestreamed the attack.
The attackers in Norway and Germany had both expressed far-right, anti-immigrant views online.
Livestreaming of some these attacks has led to changes in social media regulations in some countries.
After the Christchurch shooting, Facebook faced intense scrutiny for its role in enabling global dissemination of the horrific video.
The California-based online giant said that before the incident, posts that violated community standards “on Live or elsewhere” were taken down, and users were blocked from the platform if the offense was repeated.
Following the incident, a “one-strike” policy was introduced by the social media company for use of Facebook Live.
“From now on, anyone who violates our most serious policies will be restricted from using Live for set periods of time — for example 30 days — starting on their first offense,” Facebook said.

“For instance, someone who shares a link to a statement from a terrorist group with no context will now be immediately blocked from using Live for a set period of time.”
Facebook said that while it recognized the tension between people who would prefer “unfettered access” to their services, restrictions were needed to keep people safe on the site.
In a statement to Arab News earlier this week, a Facebook spokesperson said: “We stand with New Zealand as we remember the people and families affected by the tragedy on March 15. The New Zealand government has shown global leadership in bringing governments, industry and civil society together to combat hate and violent extremism.
“Since March 15 and the Christchurch call, we have tightened our policies, strengthened our detection technology, expanded initiatives to redirect people from violent extremism, and improved our ability to work with other companies to respond quickly to mass violence.”
The Christchurch shootings also led to important changes in New Zealand’s gun laws, with semi-automatic weapons of the kind used in the terrorist attack banned.
On April 10, 2019, a gun reform bill was passed by Parliament, and a buy-back scheme that cost the state NZ$200 million ($138 million) was introduced for banned weapons.
Under the new law, all military-style semi-automatics and assault rifles were banned, along with parts used to convert weapons into semi-automatics and all high-capacity magazines.
The law offered exemptions to farmers for pest control and animal welfare.
Several months later, new laws called for the creation of a registry to monitor every firearm legally held in New Zealand. Rules for gun dealers and individuals were tightened and the term for firearm licenses was halved to five years.
So far, Ardern has fulfilled her promise to make New Zealand a safe home for all citizens. But there are no grounds for complacency or over-optimism.
The plaudits that New Zealand’s gun-control efforts have earned outside the country are in sharp contrast to the resistance she has faced at home, including organized protests.
The opposition National Party, gun lobby groups and ordinary people have rallied against the legislation introduced in September.

"I imagine that governments trying to arrest their way out of the white nationalist and far-right quandary won't find much success,” said Strickland.

“Far-right violence is a transnational reality, and fascists regularly coordinate across borders - which is not a new development, but one that has become as important as ever to confront.”


Modi’s BJP skips Kashmir as Indian election enters fourth phase

Updated 13 May 2024
Follow

Modi’s BJP skips Kashmir as Indian election enters fourth phase

  • Millions of Indians across 96 constituencies began voting on Monday
  • Ruling party is not fighting elections in Kashmir for first time in 30 years

NEW DELHI: India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party is not contesting elections in the Muslim-majority region of Kashmir for the first time in nearly three decades, as voting in the latest round of the national polls got underway on Monday.

The world’s most populous country began voting on April 19 in a seven-phase election that is scheduled to take place over six weeks, with ballots set to be counted on June 4.

India has 968 million people eligible to vote in the general election, where incumbent Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Hindu nationalist BJP are aiming for a rare third consecutive term in power.

Monday’s voting involved 96 constituencies in the fourth round of polling.

While the BJP, which has been in power since 2014, and its allies are contesting every other part of India as they look to secure a majority of the 543 parliamentary seats, the party is sitting out in the northern Himalayan territory of Jammu and Kashmir.

This year marks the region’s first election since Modi’s government stripped the valley of its special autonomous status and statehood — which was granted by the Indian Constitution — on Aug. 5, 2019. The move unilaterally revoked the relevant provisions under Article 370, scrapping Kashmir’s flag, legislature, protections on land ownership and fundamental rights, sparking fears of demographic engineering in the region.

“It’s really surprising that the BJP, which claimed to have over 800,000 cadres in the valley, failed to find a single candidate. It shows that the BJP is not popular in the valley,” Sanjay Tickoo, the Srinagar-based leader of the Hindu minority group Kashmiri Pandit, told Arab News.

“I am expecting a record turnout to show the central government what (they) have done to the people of Jammu and Kashmir. This is the reflection of anger … no one is happy in the valley after the abrogation of Article 370.”

Indian-controlled Jammu and Kashmir is part of the larger Kashmiri territory, which has been the subject of international dispute since the 1947 partition of the Indian subcontinent into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan. Both countries claim Kashmir in full and rule in part.

Modi said his government had been focusing on jobs and development as part of an effort to end violence in the valley, which has for decades witnessed outbreaks of separatist insurgencies to resist control from the government in New Delhi.

But after the BJP lost Kashmir’s three seats in the 2019 election, the party’s popularity slid further after it revoked the region’s autonomous status later the same year and subsequently imposed months of strict communication blockade and jailed hundreds of political leaders.

“The vote expresses not only anger but also apprehension against the anti-Muslim rants that have been going on as well as whatever they have done in Kashmir,” Professor Sheikh Showkat, a Srinagar-based political analyst, told Arab News.

Altaf Thakur, BJP spokesperson in Kashmir, said the party was still taking part in the Kashmir polls by supporting other regional parties.

“It is not correct to say that we are not fighting the election, we are playing the role of kingmaker and whichever way the cadres of the BJP will go, we will win,” he told Arab News.

“It’s not important whether we stand in the elections or not, the important thing is that we have to defeat the dynasty rulers,” he said, referring to the main contenders in the Kashmir polls, the National Conference and People’s Democratic Party.

While they are fighting each other in the valley, both parties have said they oppose the BJP and are part of the Congress party-led opposition alliance, known as India.

For some Kashmiri voters, Monday’s vote was about speaking up for themselves.

“The BJP knew that they cannot tolerate the wrath of the people of Kashmir. They fled the contest without a fight,” Aijaz Ahmed, a businessman from Srinagar, told Arab News.

“I voted today because it gave me an opportunity to express myself and tell the government in Delhi that you cannot keep us silenced. We want an atmosphere without fear and a region where our own identity is not questioned.”


5,000 Filipino pilgrims expected to fly to Makkah for Hajj

Updated 13 May 2024
Follow

5,000 Filipino pilgrims expected to fly to Makkah for Hajj

  • Travelers ‘can expect VIP-like treatment,’ National Commission on Muslim Filipinos says
  • First pilgrims will take off from Manila International Airport next week

MANILA: Thousands of Filipino pilgrims are set to travel to Makkah for the upcoming Hajj pilgrimage, the National Commission on Muslim Filipinos said on Monday, with the first batch set to leave for Saudi Arabia next week.

In the predominantly Catholic Philippines, Muslims constitute about 10 percent of the nearly 120 million population. Most live on the island of Mindanao and the Sulu archipelago in the country’s south, as well as in the central-western province of Palawan.

The commission said that nearly 5,000 Muslims had confirmed they would travel to Saudi Arabia to perform the Hajj pilgrimage this year.

“We have already processed 96 percent of the pilgrims,” Zainoden Usudan, chief of Hajj operations at the NCMF’s Bureau of Pilgrimage and Endowment, said.

“They can expect VIP-like treatment, allowing them to fully concentrate on their pilgrimage.”

Officials from the commission have been working hard to ensure that the difficulties faced by pilgrims last year will not be a problem this time around.

“This time, we are making sure that food will not be a problem,” Usudan said, referring to problems with delayed meal deliveries in 2023.

He said the commission was working with a service provider in the Kingdom that had contingency plans for all aspects of the trip, including transportation.

The first Hajj flight from the Philippines is set to take off from Manila International Airport on May 23.

One of the five pillars of Islam, this year’s Hajj is expected to run from June 14-19. Many pilgrims extend their stays to make the most of the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to fulfill their religious duty.


Charities brand UK family reunion system for asylum-seekers ‘broken’

Updated 13 May 2024
Follow

Charities brand UK family reunion system for asylum-seekers ‘broken’

  • New report says thousands waiting for relatives to be relocated to Britain
  • Refugee Council CEO: ‘The UK has clearly failed the Afghan refugees that it promised to protect’

London: Charities in the UK have branded the country’s system for reuniting separated families of asylum-seekers “broken,” calling for the Home Office to “fix and expand” it.

A new report published by the Refugee Council and Safe Passage International has highlighted figures showing a backlog of more than 11,000 migrants in the UK waiting to be reunited with relatives during the summer last year.

Despite repeated freedom of information requests, the Home Office has not provided updated figures since then.

The report mentioned that a particular problem faces separated Afghan families, with many individuals reaching the UK but finding themselves in prolonged legal difficulty and their relatives forced to remain in Afghanistan, neighboring Pakistan or elsewhere.

Currently, Afghans evacuated from their country as part of Operation Pitting in August 2021 are prevented from automatically bringing close family to the UK.

In October 2023, the British government proposed a new system to address this issue, but the plan has yet to implemented despite pressure from MPs and members of the House of Lords.

Approved asylum-seekers can apply for a family reunification visa, but thousands find themselves stuck in a backlog of cases despite the Home Office saying the process should take under 12 weeks.

The Independent spoke to a number of Afghans, including a former pilot, struggling to be reunited with their relatives.

The pilot told the newspaper: “They (his family) have been waiting for a visa for five months in Iran, but so far there is no news from the embassy and there is no guarantee it will be issued.

“My family are facing a lot of problems. They don’t have a proper place to live, and don’t have access to a doctor, because they are living illegally.

“Their Iranian visas have expired and they need to extend them, but it is impossible. My wife is suffering mentally and emotionally, and she is completely (without hope).”

Another issue is that of unaccompanied children who, under current rules, also cannot use their status to automatically relocate their families to the UK.

The Independent spoke to one Afghan teenager, Farhad, rescued from Kabul without his parents in 2021, who faces an anxious wait to see if his family can join him in the UK.

“(The UK government) promised in 2021 that they’re going to bring the families, but it’s still been almost three years,” he said.

“My mum and my siblings are in Pakistan because they needed a doctor and medication. But my father couldn’t get the visa to go with them.

“I am doing my GCSEs this month and I can’t really focus on my studies knowing that my family is struggling.”

Safe Passage International highlighted the case of another young boy, Ahmad, who had tried to join his older brother in the UK.

Despite both his parents having died in Afghanistan, the Home Office denied that he had any “serious and compelling” circumstances to justify his asylum application.

He was only able to stay in the UK after a judge intervened, ordering the Home Office to provide assistance.

Safe Passage International’s CEO Dr. Wanda Wyporska told The Independent: “Nearly three years on, it’s a national shame that Afghans, who risked so much to support UK military operations, are still waiting for a way to bring their family to safety here with them. Their family members are living in fear every day of the Taliban.”

The Refugee Council’s CEO Enver Solomon said: “The UK has clearly failed the Afghan refugees that it promised to protect, by keeping families separated for so long with no information on how they may be reunited.

“After risking everything for the UK, Afghans and their families should not be forced to make dangerous boat journeys to get here, nor should they face hostile, inhumane policies like the Rwanda plan when they do make it to the UK.”

A Home Office spokesperson told The Independent: “We made one of the largest commitments of any country to support people from Afghanistan, and so far we have brought around 27,900 individuals to safety in the UK, including thousands under our Afghan resettlement schemes.

“In October we committed to establish a route for those evacuated from Afghanistan under Pathway 1 of the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme without their immediate family members, to reunite them in the UK.

“We remain on track to meet that commitment and open the route for referrals in the first half of this year.”


Philippines to tighten guard at locations in South China Sea

Updated 13 May 2024
Follow

Philippines to tighten guard at locations in South China Sea

  • Philippine Coast Guard deploys ship to Sabina Shoal on the Spratly archipelago, where it accused China of building an artificial island

MANILA/BEIJING: The Philippines said on Monday it would keep a closer guard on reefs, shoals and islets in its exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea, alarmed by reports of new reclamation activities by China, which Beijing denied.
The Philippine Coast Guard said on Saturday it had deployed a ship to Sabina Shoal on the Spratly archipelago, where it accused China of building an artificial island, having documented what it said were piles of dead and crushed coral on the sandbars.
Jonathan Malaya, spokesperson of the National Security Council (NSC), said NSC chief Eduardo Ano had ordered a tighter guard at locations within Manila’s 200-nautical mile economic zone, as a long-standing diplomatic row with Beijing intensifies.
“No one will guard (these locations) except us. It is our responsibility under international law to guard (them) and ensure that the environment there would not be damaged and that there won’t be reclamation activities,” Malaya told a regular television program.
China claims almost all the South China Sea, including parts claimed by the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia, Taiwan and Vietnam, and has carried out extensive land reclamation on some islands, building military facilities, causing concern in Washington and the region.
China’s foreign ministry on Monday dismissed Manila’s latest accusation as “groundless and pure rumor.”
“Recently, the Philippine side has repeatedly spread rumors, deliberately smeared China and attempted to mislead the international community, which is futile,” spokesperson Wang Wenbin told a regular briefing.
He urged Manila to “return to the right track of properly settling maritime disputes through negotiation and consultation.”
Philippine Coast Guard spokesperson Jay Tarriela said its presence at the Escoda shoal had deterred China from doing small-scale reclamation, but that scientists would have to determine whether the piles of coral were natural or man-made.
He said the coast guard was committed to maintaining a presence at the shoal, just over 120 nautical miles from the Philippine province of Palawan.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled in 2016 that Beijing’s claims in the South China Sea, a vital waterway, had no basis under international law, a decision that China rejects.
The Sabina Shoal, known locally as Escoda, is the rendezvous point for vessels resupplying Filipino troops stationed on a grounded warship at the Second Thomas Shoal, where Manila and China have had frequent run-ins.
Ano has called for Chinese diplomats to be expelled over the alleged leak of a phone conversation with a Filipino admiral about the maritime dispute.
On Monday, the Philippine foreign ministry said it would look into reports of “illegal and unlawful activities” by diplomatic officials, but did not name China.


3 men charged in the UK with assisting the Hong Kong intelligence service

Updated 13 May 2024
Follow

3 men charged in the UK with assisting the Hong Kong intelligence service

  • The men will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court charged under the National Security Act

LONDON: Three men have been charged with allegedly assisting Hong Kong intelligence services and with foreign interference, London’s Metropolitan Police said Monday.
The men will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court charged under the National Security Act.
Chi Leung (Peter) Wai, 38, Matthew Trickett, 37, and Chung Biu Yuen, 63, have each been charged with assisting a foreign intelligence service.
“While these offenses are concerning, I want to reassure the public that we do not believe there to be any wider threat to them,” said Commander Dominic Murphy, Head of the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command.
“This investigation remains ongoing, but now that charges have been brought, I urge people not to speculate or comment further in relation to this case.”
Hong Kong’s security bureau, Hong Kong police and the office of China’s foreign ministry in Hong Kong did immediately respond to requests for comment.