Pakistan rejects US warning on CPEC, reaffirms commitment to 'iron brother' China

1 / 2
Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, left, and China's Premier Li Keqiang depart after a signing ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Nov. 3, 2018.( AP/File photo)
2 / 2
In this file photo, Asad Umar speaks to the media during a press conference in Islamabad on April 18, 2019. (AFP)
Updated 24 November 2019
Follow

Pakistan rejects US warning on CPEC, reaffirms commitment to 'iron brother' China

  • Minister of planning was responding to a ‘warning’ against CPEC by US diplomat Alice Wells
  • China’s share only $18 billion in Pakistan’s $74 billion total public debt, minister said

KARACHI: Pakistan’s newly appointed Minister for Planning Asad Umar on Saturday rejected US reservations on the nearly $70 billion China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and said relations between ‘iron brothers’ Beijing and Islamabad would ‘never be frayed.’
Umar’s strong clarification came in response to remarks by US diplomat Alice Wells on Friday, who said the CPEC would further add to Pakistan’s debt burden. Wells is in charge of South Asia affairs at the US State Department. 
“China is a close, time-tested friend, who stood with us during the most difficult situations. We are iron brothers and have to further strengthen the friendship and take CPEC forward to bring the relationship even closer,” Umar said at the Karachi Press Club.
“This does not mean that our friendship with China goes against anyone. All countries including the US are welcome to invest in Pakistan,” he said, and added: “We don’t want to create any situation where we become a part of the conflict between other countries.
Pakistan denied that the country was heavily in debt due to Chinese loans and said loans from China made up less than a quarter of total public debt. 
“Our total public debt is $74 billion of which the Chinese debt amounts to $18 billion-- even less than one fourth of the total debt. And if I further break it down, the CPEC debt under this figure of public debt is $4.9 billion-- not even 10 percent of the total debt,” the minister said.
“As far as the money taken from China is concerned, it was taken at such a time when our trade deficit was dangerously high and our reserves were falling. We were unable to easily procure loans from other sources. This was the hallmark of China’s friendship with Pakistan that in such a time of crisis, it provided us loans from its commercial banks.”
Over the next three years, he said, debt servicing would witness about a third being spent on settling the commercial loans from China, and the commercial borrowing would be substituted by long-term, multi-lateral debt leading to a sharp decline in Chinese debt servicing.
Umar refuted Wells’ argument that the Chinese commercial loans were too expensive and had too short a payback period.
“The average maturity of public debts is 20 years. The interest on the loan is only 2.34 percent and that makes it a very cheap loan,” he said.
Umar did concede that China was making an investment in Pakistan and was not handing out aid.
“She (Alice Wells) is right-- it is basically an investment and Pakistan never said that this is aid. Pakistan’s stance is very clear that we want to move away from the dependence on aid.” 
But following a systematic negation of Wells statements, Umar said it was untrue that China would be the sole benefactor of CPEC, while listing the many infrastructural and other advantages to Pakistan.


Rating firm S&P says it won’t rush Iran war downgrades, sees risks for countries like Pakistan

Updated 12 March 2026
Follow

Rating firm S&P says it won’t rush Iran war downgrades, sees risks for countries like Pakistan

  • Agency says it is monitoring indebted energy importers as higher oil prices strain finances
  • Gulf economies seen better placed to weather shock, though Bahrain flagged as vulnerable

LONDON: S&P Global ‌said it would not make any knee-jerk sovereign rating cuts following the outbreak of war in the ​Middle East, but warned on Thursday that soaring oil and gas prices were putting a number of already cash-strapped countries at risk.

The firm’s top analysts said in a webinar that the conflict, which has involved US and Israeli strikes ‌against Iran and Iranian ‌strikes against Israel, ​US ‌bases ⁠and Gulf ​states, ⁠was now moving from a low- to moderate-risk scenario.

Most Gulf countries had enough fiscal buffers, however, to weather the crisis for a while, with more lowly rated Bahrain the only clear exception.

Qatar’s banking sector could ⁠also struggle if there were significant ‌deposit outflows in ‌reaction to the conflict, although there ​was no evidence ‌of such strains at the moment, they ‌said.

“We don’t want to jump the gun and just say things are bad,” S&P’s head global sovereign analyst, Roberto Sifon-Arevalo, said.

The longer the crisis ‌was prolonged, though, “the more difficult it is going to be,” he ⁠added.

Sifon-Arevalo ⁠said Asia was the second-most exposed region, due to many of its countries being significant Gulf oil and gas importers.

India, Thailand and Indonesia have relatively lower reserves of oil, while the region also had already heavily indebted countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka whose finances would be further hurt by rising energy prices.

“We ​are closely monitoring ​these (countries) to see how the credit stories evolve,” Sifon-Arevalo said.