Taliban rejects Al Jazeera TV  report, says no direct talks with Kabul

1 / 2
Members of a Taliban delegation take their seats during the multilateral peace talks on Afghanistan in Moscow. (Reuters)
2 / 2
Head of Political Office of Taliban Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai (R) and chief negotiator Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar (L) attend peace talks with Afghan senior politicians in Moscow, Russia May 30, 2019. (Reuters/ File Photo)
Updated 21 November 2019
Follow

Taliban rejects Al Jazeera TV  report, says no direct talks with Kabul

  • Taliban say prisoner swap deal was only a confidence-building measure for the Americans to restart stalled peace talks
  • Following prisoner swap deal, US had expressed hope for success of intra-Afghan peace negotiations

PESHAWAR: A day after the Afghan government released three high ranking Taliban leaders in return for an American and Australian hostage, the Taliban on Wednesday said they rejected media reports that claimed the prisoner swap deal was aimed at facilitating talks between the Taliban and Afghan civilian government.

The US-backed Afghan government’s decision to carry out the swap was being perceived as key to securing direct talks with the militant group, which has consistently refused to engage with what they call an illegitimate “puppet” regime in Kabul. 

But in its report published on Wednesday, Qatar-based television channel, Al-Jazeera, quoted Afghan President Ashraf Ghani as saying that the decision for the prisoner exchange deal was made after consultations with the US and that the deal was aimed at "facilitating face-to-face negotiations directly with the Taliban.”

Following this, the Taliban’s political office spokesman in Doha, Suhail Shaheen, told Arab News that the Taliban had neither reached the prisoner swap deal indirectly with the Kabul administration nor had they set any pre-conditions for sitting face-to-face for direct talks after the deal had gone through.

“We categorically reject Al Jazeera's Television report that three prisoners of the Islamic Emirate have been released for any deal and upcoming face-to-face talks with the Kabul administration. The report is totally untrue,” Shaheen said.

“The prisoners’ swap took place as a result of our talks with the Americans and should be deemed as a confidence-building measure to pave way for peace in Afghanistan,” he continued.

“Now, it is up to the Americans to move forward with the stalled peace talks, otherwise they (Americans) will be held responsible for the enduring unrest in Afghanistan,” Shaheen added.

Soon after the prisoner swap, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan welcomed the release of American and Australian hostages.

The US and Australia confirmed the release of their citizens and expressed hope that the exchange of prisoners might improve chances for dialogue between the Afghans, and an eventual peace agreement.

“The Taliban have indicated that the release of the two professors is intended as a goodwill gesture, which the United States welcomes,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement on Tuesday.

“We see these developments as hopeful signs that the Afghan war, a terrible and costly conflict that has lasted 40 years, may soon conclude through a political settlement,” Pompeo added.

Pompeo also expressed hope for “the success of intra-Afghan peace negotiations, which the United States stands ready to support.”

The Amerian and Australian hostages, both professors, were kidnapped in August 2016 from outside the American University of Afghanistan in Kabul. They were freed in return for the release of three Taliban commanders including Anas Haqqani, Hajji Mali Khan, and Hafiz Abdul Rasheed after a delayed swap. 


At UNSC, Pakistan warns competition for critical minerals could fuel global conflict

Updated 06 March 2026
Follow

At UNSC, Pakistan warns competition for critical minerals could fuel global conflict

  • The demand for critical minerals has surged worldwide due to rapid expansion of electric vehicles, advanced electronics and clean energy technologies
  • Pakistan’s representative says all partnerships in critical minerals sector must be ‘cooperative and not exploitative’ and respect national ownership

ISLAMABAD: Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, Pakistan’s permanent representative to the United Nations (UN), has warned that intensifying global competition over critical minerals could become a new driver of global conflict, urging stronger international cooperation and equitable access to resources vital for the world’s energy transition.

The warning comes as demand for critical minerals and rare earth elements surges worldwide due to the rapid expansion of electric vehicles, advanced electronics and clean energy technologies, with governments and companies increasingly competing to secure supply chains while raising concerns that this may lead to geopolitical rivalries in the coming years.

Speaking at a Security Council briefing on ‘Energy, Critical Minerals, and Security,’ Ahmad said experience showed that the risks of instability increased where mineral wealth intersected with weak governance, entrenched poverty and external interference.

“Access to affordable, reliable and sustainable energy is essential for development, stability and prosperity. The global transition toward renewable energy, electric mobility, battery storage and digital infrastructure has sharply increased the demand for critical minerals,” he said.

“This upsurge has generated new geopolitical and geo-economic pressures. If not managed responsibly, competition over natural resources can affect supply chains, aggravate tensions, undermine sovereignty and contribute to instability.”

In several conflict-affected settings, he noted, illicit extraction, trafficking networks and opaque financial flows have fueled armed conflict and violence, weakened state institutions and deprived populations of legitimate revenues.

“The scramble for natural resources and its linkage to conflict and instability is therefore not new,” Ahmad told UNSC members at the briefing. “Pakistan believes that natural resources must serve as instruments of economic development and shared prosperity, and not coercion or conflict.”

He urged the world to reaffirm the right of peoples to permanent sovereignty over their natural resources, saying all partnerships in the critical minerals sector must be cooperative and not exploitative, respect national ownership, ensure transparent contractual arrangements and align with host countries’ development strategies.

“In order to prevent the exploitation of mineral-producing countries and regions, particularly in fragile and conflict-affected settings, support their capacity-building for strengthening domestic regulatory institutions, combating illicit financial flows, ensuring environmental safeguards, and promoting equitable benefit-sharing with local communities,” he asked member states.

“Promote equitable participation in global value chains. Developing countries must be enabled to move beyond extraction toward processing, refining and downstream manufacturing. Technology transfer, skills development and responsible investment are essential to avoid perpetuating structural imbalances.”