Taliban rejects Al Jazeera TV  report, says no direct talks with Kabul

1 / 2
Members of a Taliban delegation take their seats during the multilateral peace talks on Afghanistan in Moscow. (Reuters)
2 / 2
Head of Political Office of Taliban Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai (R) and chief negotiator Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar (L) attend peace talks with Afghan senior politicians in Moscow, Russia May 30, 2019. (Reuters/ File Photo)
Updated 21 November 2019
Follow

Taliban rejects Al Jazeera TV  report, says no direct talks with Kabul

  • Taliban say prisoner swap deal was only a confidence-building measure for the Americans to restart stalled peace talks
  • Following prisoner swap deal, US had expressed hope for success of intra-Afghan peace negotiations

PESHAWAR: A day after the Afghan government released three high ranking Taliban leaders in return for an American and Australian hostage, the Taliban on Wednesday said they rejected media reports that claimed the prisoner swap deal was aimed at facilitating talks between the Taliban and Afghan civilian government.

The US-backed Afghan government’s decision to carry out the swap was being perceived as key to securing direct talks with the militant group, which has consistently refused to engage with what they call an illegitimate “puppet” regime in Kabul. 

But in its report published on Wednesday, Qatar-based television channel, Al-Jazeera, quoted Afghan President Ashraf Ghani as saying that the decision for the prisoner exchange deal was made after consultations with the US and that the deal was aimed at "facilitating face-to-face negotiations directly with the Taliban.”

Following this, the Taliban’s political office spokesman in Doha, Suhail Shaheen, told Arab News that the Taliban had neither reached the prisoner swap deal indirectly with the Kabul administration nor had they set any pre-conditions for sitting face-to-face for direct talks after the deal had gone through.

“We categorically reject Al Jazeera's Television report that three prisoners of the Islamic Emirate have been released for any deal and upcoming face-to-face talks with the Kabul administration. The report is totally untrue,” Shaheen said.

“The prisoners’ swap took place as a result of our talks with the Americans and should be deemed as a confidence-building measure to pave way for peace in Afghanistan,” he continued.

“Now, it is up to the Americans to move forward with the stalled peace talks, otherwise they (Americans) will be held responsible for the enduring unrest in Afghanistan,” Shaheen added.

Soon after the prisoner swap, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan welcomed the release of American and Australian hostages.

The US and Australia confirmed the release of their citizens and expressed hope that the exchange of prisoners might improve chances for dialogue between the Afghans, and an eventual peace agreement.

“The Taliban have indicated that the release of the two professors is intended as a goodwill gesture, which the United States welcomes,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement on Tuesday.

“We see these developments as hopeful signs that the Afghan war, a terrible and costly conflict that has lasted 40 years, may soon conclude through a political settlement,” Pompeo added.

Pompeo also expressed hope for “the success of intra-Afghan peace negotiations, which the United States stands ready to support.”

The Amerian and Australian hostages, both professors, were kidnapped in August 2016 from outside the American University of Afghanistan in Kabul. They were freed in return for the release of three Taliban commanders including Anas Haqqani, Hajji Mali Khan, and Hafiz Abdul Rasheed after a delayed swap. 


Pakistan opposition to continue protest over ex-PM Khan’s health amid conflicting reports

Updated 16 February 2026
Follow

Pakistan opposition to continue protest over ex-PM Khan’s health amid conflicting reports

  • Pakistan’s government insists that the ex-premier’s eye condition has improved
  • Khan’s personal doctor says briefed on his condition but cannot confirm veracity

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s opposition alliance on Monday vowed to continue their protest sit-in at parliament and demanded “clarity” over the health of jailed former prime minister Imran Khan, following conflicting medical reports about his eye condition.

The 73-year-old former cricket star-turned-politician has been held at the high-security Adiala prison in Rawalpindi since 2023. Concerns arose about his health last week when a court-appointed lawyer, Barrister Salman Safdar, was asked to visit Khan at the jail to assess his living conditions. Safdar reported that Khan had suffered “severe vision loss” in his right eye due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), leaving him with just 15 percent sight in the affected eye.

On Sunday, a team of doctors from various hospitals visited the prison to examine Khan’s eye condition, according to the Adiala jail superintendent, who later submitted his report in the court. On Monday, a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi observed that based on reports from the prison authorities and the amicus curiae, Khan’s “living conditions in jail do not presently exhibit any perverse aspects.” It noted that Khan had “generally expressed satisfaction with the prevailing conditions of his confinement” and had not sought facilities beyond the existing level of care.

Having carefully perused both reports in detail, the bench observed that their general contents and the overall picture emerging therefrom are largely consistent. The opposition alliance, which continued to stage its sit-in for a fourth consecutive day on Monday, held a meeting at the parliament building on Monday evening to deliberate on the emerging situation and discuss their future course of action.

“The sit-in will continue till there is clarity on the matter of [Khan's] health,”  Sher Ali Arbab, a lawmaker from Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party who has been participating in the sit-in, told Arab News, adding that PTI Chairman Gohar Ali Khan and Opposition Leader in Senate Raja Nasir Abbas had briefed them about their meeting with doctors who had visited Khan on Sunday.

Speaking to reporters outside parliament, Gohar said the doctors had informed them that Khan’s condition had improved.

“They said, 'There has been a significant and satisfactory improvement.' With that satisfactory improvement, we also felt satisfied,” he said, noting that the macular thickness in Khan’s eye had reportedly dropped from 550 to 300 microns, a sign of subsiding swelling.

Gohar said the party did not want to politicize Khan’s health.

“We are not doctors, nor is this our field,” he said, noting that Khan’s personal physician in Lahore, Dr. Aasim Yusuf, and his eye specialist Dr. Khurram Mirza had also sought input from the Islamabad-based medical team.

“Our doctors also expressed satisfaction over the report.”

CONFLICTING ACCOUNTS

Despite Gohar’s cautious optimism, Khan’s personal physician, Dr. Yusuf, issued a video message on Monday, saying he could neither “confirm nor deny the veracity” of the government’s claims.

“Because I have not seen him myself and have not been able to participate in his care... I’m unable to confirm what we have been told,” Yusuf said.

He appealed to authorities to grant him or fellow physician, Dr. Faisal Sultan, immediate access to Khan, arguing that the ex-premier should be moved to Shifa International Hospital in Islamabad for specialist care.

Speaking to Arab News, PTI’s central information secretary Sheikh Waqas Akram said Khan’s sister and their cousin, Dr. Nausherwan Burki, will speak to media on Tuesday to express their views about the situation.

The government insists that Khan’s condition has improved.

“His eye [condition] has improved and is better than before,” State Minister Talal Chaudhry told the media in a brief interaction on Monday.

“The Supreme Court of Pakistan is involved, and doctors are involved. What medicine he receives, whether he needs to be hospitalized or sent home, these decisions are made by doctors. Neither lawyers nor any political party will decide this.”