US Treasury official visits Lebanon

A handout picture provided by the Lebanese photo agency Dalati and Nohra shows Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri meeting US treasury assistant secretary for terrorist financing, Marshall Billingslea, at the governmental palace in the Lebanese capital Beirut on September 23, 2019. (AFP)
Updated 24 September 2019
Follow

US Treasury official visits Lebanon

  • Billingslea meets PM, Parliament speaker, banking officials amid sanctions

BEIRUT: The assistant secretary for terrorist financing in the US Treasury Department met on Monday with Lebanon’s Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Saad Hariri as part of a two-day visit to the country. In a statement, the US Embassy in Lebanon said Marshall Billingslea “will highlight the strong partnership between the United States and Lebanon and the US government’s confidence, in general, in the Lebanese financial sector.”
The embassy added: “During Billingslea’s meetings with officials and bankers, he will urge Lebanon to take the necessary steps to distance itself from Hezbollah and other malicious parties trying to destabilize the country and its institutions.”
Berri’s adviser Dr. Ali Hamdan told Arab News: “We listened to what he (Billingslea) has to say. Let us see what he has to add during his visit. We don’t want to comment on his positions.” Hariri’s office said the two sides reviewed financial and economic relations between the two countries.
Billingslea also met with the governor of Lebanon’s Central Bank, Riad Salameh, the Banking Control Commission of Lebanon and the Association of Banks in Lebanon.
The visit comes amid a foreign currency liquidity crisis that has plagued Lebanon for more than a week, following US sanctions that included Jammal Trust Bank on Aug. 29.
The bank’s management announced a few days ago that it had decided to self-liquidate in full coordination with the Central Bank.
Economist Violette Balaa told Arab News: “Billingslea asked during his meetings for details regarding the liquidation of Jammal Trust Bank, and was keen on knowing that the accounts sanctioned by the US weren’t transferred to other banks.”
No Lebanese banks offered to buy Jammal Trust Bank, fearing US sanctions. “Billingslea’s tone, especially when he asserted that the US will continue to reinforce and impose more sanctions, was harsh,” Balaa said.

FASTFACT

Iranian-backed Hezbollah movement has been a US-designated terrorist group since 1997 and fights alongside the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria’s civil war.

“He added that the attacks on Saudi Aramco will receive many responses, and that the situation after the attacks won’t be as it used to be.”
Balaa said Billingslea did not mention other banks that would be subject to US sanctions during his meeting with the Association of Banks in Lebanon.
The liquidity crisis prompted Salameh to reassure the Lebanese public on Monday that “dollar bills are available … banks are meeting citizens’ needs of this currency, dollar liquidity is present in the banking sector, and Lebanon’s Central Bank has its assets in dollars.”
He said: “Billingslea’s visit is not to suppress the banks. We cherish having a good relationship with the US Treasury.” Salameh added: “The dollar exchange rate is not the responsibility of Lebanon’s Central Bank.”
Banks in Lebanon are pricing the dollar exchange rate between 1,507.50 and 1,517 Lebanese pounds, according to the official rate.
But exchange offices tend to price it between 1,550 and 1,570 Lebanese pounds under the pretext of scarcity in the market.
The pro-Hezbollah Al-Akhbar newspaper described Billingslea as a “banks slaughterer,” and said his visit “was in the context of the pressure imposed by the US on Lebanon, under the pretext of preventing the facilitation of financial activities for Hezbollah.”
According to the US Embassy, Billingslea visited Lebanon in early 2018 to discuss combating illicit financing, including financing Hezbollah’s terrorist activities and illegal trafficking.
The embassy said Billingslea “shared the opinion of the Lebanese authorities and financial institutions officials that he met with, in the fight against all forms of illicit financing.”
It added: “He stressed the importance of combating harmful Iranian activity in Lebanon and how the United States is committed to helping Lebanon to protect its financial system from Hezbollah, Daesh (Daesh), and other terrorist organizations.”
Billingslea urged Lebanon “to take all possible measures to ensure that Hezbollah is not part of the country’s financial sector.”


Civilians and aid operations bare brunt of drone strikes in Sudan’s Kordofan

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Civilians and aid operations bare brunt of drone strikes in Sudan’s Kordofan

  • At least 77 people killed and dozens injured in various attacks in Kordofan, mostly by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces
  • Residents say RSF drone strikes are taking place almost daily around the two key cities of Kadugli and Dilling
CAIRO: A surge in drone strikes in the Sudanese region of Kordofan has taken a growing toll on civilians and hampered aid operations, analysts and humanitarian workers said Wednesday, as the war in Sudan nears the three-year mark.
At least 77 people were killed and dozens injured in various attacks, mostly by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, in densely populated areas, according to Sudan Doctors Network, a group that tracks violence through the war. Many of the victims were civilians.
The conflict between the RSF and the Sudanese military erupted into a full-blown war in April 2023. So far, at least 40,000 people have been killed and 12 million displaced, according to the World Health Organization. Aid groups say the true toll could be many times higher, as the fighting in vast and remote areas impedes access.
The military increased its use of drones and airstrikes in Kordofan over the past year as the conflict shifted westward, making the region “a primary theater of operations,” said Jalale Getachew Birru, senior analyst for East Africa at the nonprofit Armed Conflict Location & Event Data, ACLED.
Two weeks ago, the military said it broke the RSF siege of Kadugli, the capital of South Kordofan province, and the neighboring town of Dilling after more than two years.
However, Birru said the sieges were not fully broken. “These cities are still encircled, and the fight for the control of these cities and the wider region is ongoing,” he told The Associated Press.

Daily drone strikes

Walid Mohamed, a resident of Kadugli, told the AP that breaking the siege allowed more goods and medicines to enter the city, reopening the corridor with Dilling and driving down food prices after a dire humanitarian situation unfolded there. However, he said RSF drone strikes have since occurred almost daily, mainly targeting hospitals, markets and homes.
Omran Ahmed, a resident of Dilling, also said drone strikes had increased, “spreading fear and terror among residents as they see more civilians become victims.”
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk on Wednesday sounded the alarm that drone strikes killed more than 50 civilians over two days this week.
“These latest killings are yet another reminder of the devastating consequences on civilians of the escalating use of drone warfare in Sudan,” said Türk, condemning the attacks on civilian sites including markets, health facilities and schools.
UN spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said there was evidence that both sides had used drones against civilians in this week’s attacks.
“These civilians have been at one time or another in government-controlled areas and areas controlled by the RSF, which would make us believe that both sides are using them,” he said.
Two military officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to brief the media, told the AP this week that the army doesn’t target civilian infrastructure.
A UN convoy reached Dilling and Kadugli with aid for more than 130,000 people, the first major delivery in three months, United Nations agencies said Wednesday. However, aid workers are concerned about escalating violence.
Mathilde Vu, an advocacy manager with the Norwegian Refugee Council told the AP there’s “huge concern” about the “unacceptable” escalation in Kordofan and that it could “shatter lives and obstruct any hope to reverse the famine/ starvation” in the region.
“It’s very indiscriminate. Between Kordofan, Darfur and the east (Sennar), it’s now every other day we receive messages like ‘drone attack here, hit a civilian infrastructure, killed people,’” Vu said.

Kordofan battlefront shifts

Much of the recent fighting in Sudan has been centered in Kordofan, where the army wants to create a route into the neighboring region of Darfur, Kholood Khair, founding director of Confluence Advisory, a think tank, told the AP.
El-Fasher city, the capital of North Darfur, was the army’s last stronghold in the region but fell to the RSF in October. Its recapture could allow the army to restore important supply and logistic lines between Kordofan and Darfur.
Meanwhile, the RSF wants to create a route out of Kordofan, back to the center of the country and the capital, Khartoum, Khair said.
Both the military and the RSF have used drones, especially in North Kordofan. Civilians have been hard-hit.
Last year, 163 air and drone strikes across the country targeted civilians, killing 1,032 people, according to ACLED data. The army reportedly carried out 83 strikes that caused 568 deaths, while the RSF conducted 66 strikes that killed 288 people.
Both sides have stepped up their use of drones in Kordofan over the past few weeks, according to Federico Donelli, associate professor of international relations at the University of Trieste.
Donelli said several factors are driving the increase, including the army’s acquisition of new weapons and drones manufactured and supplied by foreign actors.
“This has enabled the army to rely more heavily on precision strikes, mirroring tactics that the Rapid Support Forces have been using for some time,” he said,
Both sides may be struggling to maintain troop strength, he said. “Consequently, drones are favored over deploying armed units on the ground, particularly in contested areas such as Kordofan.”
Khair, from Confluence Advisory, said the fighting in Kordofan could shift in the upcoming period, with the army potentially seeking to push into Darfur, particularly toward el-Fasher, where war crimes have been reported.
“We expect to see the bombing campaigns not only continue but increase in frequency and volume,” she said.