Saudi Arabia backs US charge Iran behind Gulf of Oman tanker attacks

The Norwegian owned Front Altair tanker was attacked in the waters of the Gulf of Oman. (AFP)
Updated 17 June 2019
Follow

Saudi Arabia backs US charge Iran behind Gulf of Oman tanker attacks

  • Iran’s foreign ministry dismisses accusation as ‘baseless’
  • Anwar Gargash, the UAE minister of state for foreign affairs: twin attacks marked a ‘dangerous escalation’

LONDON: Saudi Arabia said it agrees with the US blaming Iran for attacks on two tankers in the Gulf of Oman as the Americans produced a video on Thursday showing the removal of a mine from the side of one of the ships by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC).

US Central Command spokesman Bill Urban released a video of what the US military said was an IRGC Gashti Class patrol boat approaching the ship Kokuka Courageous “and was observed and recorded removing (an) unexploded limpet mine from the M/T Kokuka Courageous.”

The attacks on the ships are part of a “campaign” of “escalating tension” by Iran and a threat to international peace and security, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said.

“It is the assessment of the United States government that the Islamic Republic of Iran is responsible for the attacks that occurred in the Gulf of Oman today,” Pompeo said. “This assessment is based on intelligence, the weapons used, the level of expertise needed to execute the operation, recent similar Iranian attacks on shipping, and the fact that no proxy group operating in the area has the resources and proficiency to act with such a high degree of sophistication.”

“We have no reason to disagree with the secretary of state. We agree with him,” Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir told CNN. “Iran has a history of doing this.”

The United Arab Emirates said Friday that the twin attacks on tankers in the Gulf of Oman just weeks after four ships were damaged off the UAE coast marked a “dangerous escalation.”
“The attack against the tankers in the Gulf of Oman is a worrying development and a dangerous escalation,” Anwar Gargash, the UAE minister of state for foreign affairs, tweeted after Thursday’s blasts.

 

UK foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt on Friday also said that there is no reason not to believe US assessment that Iran was behind tanker incident.

“We are going to make our own independent assessment, we have our processes to do that, (but) we have no reason not to believe the American assessment and our instinct is to believe it because they are our closest ally,” Hunt told BBC radio on Friday, echoing comments he made late on Thursday.

Meanwhile, China on Friday called for “dialogue” after the United States accused Iran of being behind attacks on two tankers in the Gulf of Oman.

Nobody wants war in the Gulf of Oman, the country’s foreign ministry said.

“We hope that all the relevant sides can properly resolve their differences and resolve the conflict through dialogue and consultations,” said foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang at a regular press briefing.

“This conforms with the interests of regional countries, and also conforms with the interests of the international community,” he added.

Also on Thursday, senior US officials said they do not believe the threat from Iran is over.

Speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter, the officials said the US photographed an unexploded mine on the side of one of the tankers, which led to the assessment that Iran was responsible for the attack. The photograph is expected to be made public later Thursday.

The officials say the US will reevaluate its presence in the region. They advise that a program to provide military escorts of merchant ships under consideration.

Iran’s foreign ministry on Friday dismissed the US accusation that it was behind the attacks on two tankers in the Gulf of Oman as “baseless.”
Responding to the “baseless accusations” of Pompeo, Iran Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi insisted that Iran had come to “help” the ships in distress and “saved” their crew as quick as possible, according to a statement published on his Telegram channel.

The crew of a Japanese-owned tanker hit in an apparent attack in the Gulf of Oman saw a “flying object” before a second blast on board, the operator’s head said Friday. They also saw Iranian naval vessel nearby, he added.
“The crew members are saying that they were hit by a flying object. They saw it with their own eyes,” Yutaka Katada, head of Kokuka Sangyo shipping company, told reporters.

 

Dr. Theodore Karasik, senior adviser at Gulf State Analytics in Washington, DC, said the leadership in Tehran may be fracturing under economic pressure from the US, with supreme leader Ali Khamenei losing control of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). “Iran is continuing to lash out because of its inability to deal with the sanctions,” he said.

The Front Altair and the Kokuka Courageous were hit by explosions shortly after passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the narrow passage at the entrance to the Arabian Gulf, through which about a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes.

In July 2018, two Saudi Arabian oil tankers were attacked in the Bab Al-Mandeb strait at the southern entrance to the Red Sea off the coast of Yemen. The Arab military coalition supporting the Yemeni government blamed the Iran-backed Houthi militia for that attack.

Thursday’s attacks in the Gulf of Oman are a “major escalation,” coalition spokesman Col. Turki Al-Maliki said. “From my perspective ... we can connect it to the Houthi attacks at Bab Al-Mandeb.”

Donald Trump, who has made economic and military pressure against Iran a cornerstone of his foreign policy, was being briefed Thursday about the tanker attack.

-------

READ MORE

Two tanker owners suspend Gulf bookings as tension now ‘as high as it gets’

Tankers attacked with ‘mine and torpedo’ in Gulf of Oman

-------

A US defense official told CBS News “it was “highly likely Iran caused these attacks.”

The official said American authorities are expected to recover sufficient debris from the attacks to  trace their source and that any US retaliation would depend on the evidence and on other Gulf countries.

The Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit told the UN Security Council: “Some parties in the region are trying to instigate fires in the region and we must be aware of that.”

His comments will be read as reference to Iran, which Arab countries accuse of attempting to destabilize the region, primarily though its proxy forces in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and Yemen.

Aboul Gheit called on the council to act against those responsible for the attacks to maintain security in the Gulf.

Pressure has been mounting on Tehran from crippling economic sanctions, which have  greatly reduced its oil exports, and an increased US military presence in the region.

The attacks were the second in a month near the Strait of Hormuz, a major strategic waterway for world oil supplies.

The United States and Saudi Arabia blamed Iran for last month’s attacks using limpet mines on four tankers moored off the coast of the UAE. Thursday’s attacks against tankers under steam, moving cargo from Arabian Gulf ports in the UAE and Saudi Arabia to international customers, would be an escalation.

Observers believe the attacks on shipping could be Iran attempting to reassert its position.

“We see this as Iran trying to get negotiating leverage it doesn’t have,” Bob McNally, president of the US consultancy Rapidan Energy Group, told Reuters. “I don’t think it tips us over into direct military confrontation. It is still deniable and denied. This is still going to be like the attack last month – everyone is denying it. It’s a blunt message.”

Other international responses offered strong condemnation but urged caution on attributing blame.

Kuwait's Foreign Minister Sheikh Sabah Khaled Al-Sabah described the attacks as a threat to international peace and security.

 

“This is the most recent event in a series of acts of sabotage that are threatening the security of maritime corridors as well as threatening energy security of the world,” he said.

Acting US Ambassador to the UN Jonathan Cohen said attacks on commercial shipping were “unacceptable” and “raise very serious concerns.”

‘The US government is providing assistance and will continue to assess the situation,” he told the UN Security Council.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned at the meeting that the world cannot afford “a major confrontation in the Gulf region.”

“I strongly condemn any attack against civilian vessels. Facts must be established and responsibilities clarified,” he said.

Qatar condemned the attacks "regardless of who was behind them," the state news agency QNA reported. Qatar also called on all parties to show restraint and stop escalation, while calling for an international investigation into the attacks. 


Lebanon approves financial gap draft law despite opposition from Hezbollah and Lebanese Forces

Lebanon's Prime Minister Nawaf Salam speaking during a press conference after a cabinet session in Beirut on December 26, 2025.
Updated 21 min 28 sec ago
Follow

Lebanon approves financial gap draft law despite opposition from Hezbollah and Lebanese Forces

  • Legislation aims to address the fate of billions of dollars in deposits that have been inaccessible to Lebanese citizens during the country’s financial meltdown

BEIRUT: Lebanon’s Cabinet on Friday approved a controversial draft law to regulate financial recovery and return frozen bank deposits to citizens. The move is seen as a key step in long-delayed economic reforms demanded by the International Monetary Fund.

The decision, which passed with 13 ministers voting in favor and nine against, came after marathon discussions over the so-called “financial gap” or deposit recovery bill, stalled for years since the banking crisis erupted in 2019. The ministers of culture and foreign affairs were absent from the session.

The legislation aims to address the fate of billions of dollars in deposits that have been inaccessible to Lebanese citizens during the country’s financial meltdown.

The vote was opposed by three ministers from the Lebanese Forces Party, three ministers from Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, as well as the minister of youth and sports, Nora Bayrakdarian, the minister of communications, Charles Al-Hajj, and the minister of justice, Adel Nassar.

Finance Minister Yassin Jaber broke ranks with his Hezbollah and Amal allies, voting in favor of the bill. He described his decision as being in line with “Lebanon’s supreme financial interest and its obligations to the IMF and the international community.”

The draft law triggered fierce backlash from depositors who reject any suggestion they shoulder responsibility for the financial collapse. It has also drawn strong criticism from the Association of Banks and parliamentary blocs, fueling fears the law will face intense political wrangling in Parliament ahead of elections scheduled in six months.

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam confirmed the Cabinet had approved the bill and referred it to Parliament for debate and amendments before final ratification. Addressing public concerns, he emphasized that the law includes provisions for forensic auditing and accountability.

“Depositors with accounts under $100,000 will be repaid in full with interest and without any deductions,” Salam said. “Large depositors will also receive their first $100,000 in full, and the remainder will be issued as negotiable bonds backed by the assets of the Central Bank, valued at around $50 billion.”

He said further that bondholders will receive an initial 2 percent payout after the first tranche of repayments is completed.

The law also includes a clause requiring criminal accountability. “Anyone who smuggled funds abroad or benefited from unjustified profits will be fined 30 percent,” Salam said.

He emphasized that Lebanon’s gold reserves will remain untouched. “A clear provision reaffirms the 1986 law barring the sale or mortgaging of gold without parliamentary approval,” he said, dismissing speculation about using the reserves to cover financial losses.

Salam admitted that the law was not perfect but called it “a fair step toward restoring rights.”

“The banking sector’s credibility has been severely damaged. This law aims to revive it by valuing assets, recapitalizing banks, and ending Lebanon’s dangerous reliance on a cash economy,” he said. “Each day of delay further erodes people’s rights.”

While the Association of Banks did not release an immediate response after the vote, it previously argued during discussions that the law would destroy remaining deposits. Bank representatives said lenders would struggle to secure more than $20 billion to cover the initial repayment tier and accused the state of absolving itself of responsibility while effectively granting amnesty for decades of financial mismanagement and corruption.

The law’s fate now rests with Parliament, where political competition ahead of the 2025 elections could complicate or delay its passage.

Lebanon’s banking sector has been at the heart of the country’s economic collapse, with informal capital controls locking depositors out of their savings and trust in state institutions plunging. International donors, including the IMF, have made reforms to the sector a key condition for any financial assistance.