GENEVA: The United States won a World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling on Thursday against China’s use of tariff-rate quotas for rice, wheat and corn, which it successfully argued limited market access for US grain exports.
The case, lodged by the Obama administration in late 2016, marked the second US victory in as many months. It came amid US-China trade talks and on the heels of Washington clinching a WTO ruling on China’s price support for grains in March.
A WTO dispute panel ruled on Thursday that under the terms of its 2001 WTO accession, China’s administration of the tariff rate quotas (TRQs) as a whole violated its obligation to administer them on a “transparent, predictable and fair basis.”
TRQs are two-level tariffs, with a limited volume of imports allowed at the lower ‘in-quota’ tariff and subsequent imports charged an “out-of-quota” tariff, which is usually much higher.
The administration of state trading enterprises and non-state enterprises’ portions of TRQs are inconsistent with WTO rules, the panel said.
Australia, Brazil, India, and the European Union were among those reserving their rights in the dispute brought by the world’s largest grain exporter.
In a statement, US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue welcomed the decision, saying China’s system “ultimately inhibits TRQs from filling, denying US farmers access to China’s market for grain.”
If China’s TRQs had been fully used, $3.5 billion worth of corn, wheat and rice would have been imported in 2015 alone, it said, citing US Department of Agriculture estimates.
The two WTO rulings would help American farmers “compete on a more level playing field,” the USTR statement said, adding: “The (Trump) Administration will continue to press China to promptly come into compliance with its WTO obligations.”
The latest WTO panel said that the United States had not proven all of its case, failing to show that China had violated its public notice obligation under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in respect to TRQs.
China’s Ministry of Commerce said in a statement on Friday it “regrets” the panel’s decision and that it would “earnestly evaluate” the panel’s report.
China would “handle the matter appropriately in accordance with WTO dispute resolution procedures, actively safeguard the stability of the multilateral trading system and continue to administer the relevant agricultural import tariff quotas in compliance with WTO rules,” it said.
Either side can appeal the ruling within 60 days.
US wins WTO ruling against China grain import quotas
US wins WTO ruling against China grain import quotas
Saudi Arabia approves annual borrowing plan for 2026
RIYADH: Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Finance Mohammed Al-Jadaan on Saturday approved the Kingdom’s annual borrowing plan for the 2026 fiscal year, following its endorsement by the NDMC’s Board of Directors, the Saudi Press Agency reported.
The plan outlines key developments in public debt during 2025, initiatives aimed at strengthening local debt markets, and the funding strategy and guiding principles for 2026, SPA added.
It also includes the issuance calendar for the Local Saudi Sukuk Issuance Program in Saudi riyals for the year.
According to the plan, the Kingdom’s projected funding needs for 2026 are estimated at approximately SR217 billion ($57.8 billion).
This is intended to cover an anticipated budget deficit of SR165 billion, as set out in the Ministry of Finance’s official budget statement, as well as principal repayments on debt maturing during the year, estimated at around SR52 billion.
The plan aims to maintain debt sustainability while diversifying funding sources across domestic and international markets through both public and private channels.
Funding will be raised through the issuance of bonds, sukuk and loans at fair cost, according to the SPA report.
It also outlines plans to expand alternative government financing, including project and infrastructure funding and the use of export credit agencies, during fiscal year 2026 and over the medium term, within prudent risk management frameworks.










