Peace only way forward for Pakistan, India: PM Khan

Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan speaks at the groundbreaking ceremony for the Kartarpur Corridor on Wednesday. (AFP)
Updated 28 November 2018
Follow

Peace only way forward for Pakistan, India: PM Khan

  • Imran Khan urged the longtime South Asian foes to let go of the past
  • The Kartarpur corridor will make it easier for Sikhs in India to visit the Gurdwara Darbar Sahib

It is foolish to believe that two nuclear-armed nations could go to war with each other, and peace is the only way forward for New Delhi and Islamabad, Pakistan’s prime minister said on Wednesday.

Imran Khan, who was speaking at a groundbreaking ceremony for a border gate in Kartarpur near India, urged the longtime South Asian foes to let go of the past. Pakistan would take two steps toward friendship even if India only took one, he said.

“The longer we don’t break the shackles of the past, we will remain captive to it. The blame game will continue and the two countries will persist with point scoring,” he added.

The Kartarpur corridor will make it easier for Sikhs in India to visit the Gurdwara Darbar Sahib, where the founder of the religion is believed to have spent the last years of his life. 

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Dr. Muhammed Faisal told Arab News that the decision to facilitate visa-free entry for pilgrims is “a very positive development” for minorities in the region.

“(The idea) has found success and traction with the Indian side, which is very, very good,” he said.

While India has welcomed the corridor project, its foreign minister scotched the idea of talks.

“I am happy,” said Sushma Swaraj. “For the last 20 years India has been asking for the Kartarpur corridor, and for the first time Pakistan’s government has responded positively.”

But the resumption of talks and the Kartarpur project are two different things, she added.

“Bilateral dialogue will always see that terror and talks don’t go together. The moment Pakistan stops terrorist activities in India, the dialogue can start,” she said.

There have been mixed feelings in India about a warming of ties with its rival. India’s Vice President M. Venkaiah Naidu called the corridor project “a bridge between the people of the two countries.” 

But Amarinder Singh, chief minister of the Indian state of Punjab, said Pakistan should rein in its army and blamed the country’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) for trying to revive the Khalistani movement, which seeks a separate homeland for Sikhs.

“Terrorist groups working at the behest of the ISI-backed KLF (Khalistan Liberation Force) and other groups based in Pakistan are clearly working on a conspiracy to destabilize Punjab,” Singh said. 

But India’s former high commissioner to Pakistan, T. C. A. Raghavan, said there should not be too much concern about the Khalistanis.

“It shouldn’t lead to a breakdown of the relationship between India and Pakistan. After all, we have concerns about Khalistanis in Canada, yet we have a relationship with Canada,” he told Arab News.

“We have concerns about Khalistanis in the UK. That doesn’t mean we should stop everything with the UK,” he said. 

“We have to adjust the concerns and we have to be cautious. We should ensure that Khalistanis are isolated. Anyway, no one gives them much importance.”


Venezuela advances amnesty bill that could lead to mass release of political prisoners

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Venezuela advances amnesty bill that could lead to mass release of political prisoners

  • Such an amnesty is a central demand of the country’s opposition and human rights organizations with backing from the United States

CARACAS: Venezuela’s legislature on Thursday advanced an amnesty bill proposed by acting President Delcy Rodríguez that could lead to the release of hundreds of opposition leaders, journalists and human rights activists detained for political reasons.
Such an amnesty is a central demand of the country’s opposition and human rights organizations with backing from the United States. But the contents of the bill have not been released publicly, and rights groups have so far reacted with cautious optimism — and with demands for more information.
The bill, introduced just weeks after the US military captured then-President Nicolás Maduro, still requires a second debate that has yet to be scheduled. Once approved, it must be signed by Rodríguez before it can go into effect.
In announcing the bill late last month, Rodríguez told a gathering of justices, magistrates, ministers, military brass and other government leaders that the ruling party-controlled National Assembly would take up the legislation with urgency.
“May this law serve to heal the wounds left by the political confrontation fueled by violence and extremism,” she said in a pre-taped televised event. “May it serve to redirect justice in our country, and may it serve to redirect coexistence among Venezuelans.”
Rights groups, fearing some political detainees will be excluded, want more details about the requirements for amnesty before any final vote.
The Venezuelan Program for Education-Action in Human Rights, or PROVEA, issued a statement emphasizing that the bill must be made public urgently due to its potential impact on victims’ rights and broader Venezuelan society.
Based on what is known so far about the legislation, the amnesty would cover a broad timeline, spanning the administration of the late Hugo Chávez from 1999 to 2013 and that of his political heir, Maduro, until this year. It would exclude people convicted of murder, drug trafficking, and serious human rights violations, reports indicate.