Israel-Oman meeting has 'strategic implications' for Pakistan, says minister

Shireen Mazari. (Photo courtesy: @pid_gov)
Updated 29 October 2018
Follow

Israel-Oman meeting has 'strategic implications' for Pakistan, says minister

  • Human Rights Minister says no plane flew into Islamabad from Tel Aviv as reported
  • Comments follow meeting between Omani leader and Netanyahu on Friday

ISLAMABAD: Following a rare meeting between the leaders of Israel and Oman a day earlier, Federal Minister for Human Rights, Shireen Mazari, took to social media on Saturday to highlight the “strategic implications” that the rendezvous could have on Pakistan.
“Interesting how Israeli media, with a plane fake news, managed to divert Pak media’s attention away from the imp [sic] security issue of the Netanyahu-Oman visit which has strategic implications for Pak if Israel gets a permanent foothold in Oman where US mly (military) already has a presence,” she posted in a tweet. 

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government has strongly denied allegations that a private plane flew into Islamabad from Israel via Jordan. Reports of the incident went viral on news channels and social media platforms, with the opposition accusing the PTI government of being involved in “something fishy.”
The plane is said to have landed in Pakistan a day before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with Oman’s leader Sultan Qaboos bin Said. According to Mazari, the “fake news” was created to divert the media’s attention from the meeting.
In a first-of-its-kind visit in 22-years, Netanyahu, on Friday, returned from an unannounced visit to Oman. According to the Associated Press (AP), the Israeli PM’s office said that he had been invited by the Omani leader after lengthy communications.
Oman state TV carried images of the two leaders holding talks, while Netanyahu shared a video of his visit on his official social media account terming it as “a special visit to Oman — making history!”
The Israeli PM was accompanied by his wife, the head of Mossad (Israel’s intelligence agency), the national security adviser, the foreign ministry director and other defense officials.
A senior Palestinian official told AP that Sultan Qaboos had offered to mediate between the Palestinians and Israelis and that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas had welcomed any “meaningful” peace process. However, the official added that the visit was mostly connected to Oman’s “regional role.”
While Oman’s influence is limited, its unique regional position could enable it to play a bigger role in mediating between Israel and archenemy Iran, the AP reported. Thus far, Israel and Oman have not maintained any diplomatic relations. The only Arab States to officially recognize Israel are Egypt and Jordan. Pakistan does not officially recognize Israel, nor does it maintain diplomatic relations with it.
The two countries have long maintained undeclared contacts at the lower levels with the only known interaction to have taken place in 2005 between ex-foreign minister Khurshid Kasuri and his Israeli counterpart Silvan Shalom.
On Sunday, however, before boarding a flight — for a three-day official visit to Turkey – Pakistan President Arif Alvi asserted that Pakistan “is not going to establish any ties with Israel.”


Imran Khan not a ‘national security threat,’ ex-PM’s party responds to Pakistan military

Updated 06 December 2025
Follow

Imran Khan not a ‘national security threat,’ ex-PM’s party responds to Pakistan military

  • Pakistan’s military spokesperson on Friday described Khan’s anti-army narrative as a “national security threat”
  • PTI Chairman Gohar Ali Khan says words used by military spokesperson for Khan were “not appropriate”

ISLAMABAD: Former prime minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party on Saturday responded to allegations by Pakistan military spokesperson Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry from a day earlier, saying that he was not a “national security threat.”

Chaudhry, who heads the military’s media wing as director general of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), spoke to journalists on Friday, in which he referred to Khan as a “mentally ill” person several times during the press interaction. Chaudhry described Khan’s anti-army narrative as a “national security threat.”

The military spokesperson was responding to Khan’s social media post this week in which he accused Chief of Defense Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir of being responsible for “the complete collapse of the constitution and rule of law in Pakistan.” 

“The people of Pakistan stand with Imran Khan, they stand with PTI,” the party’s secretary-general, Salman Akram Raja, told reporters during a news conference. 

“Imran Khan is not a national security threat. Imran Khan has kept the people of this country united.”

Raja said there were several narratives in the country, including those that created tensions along ethnic and sectarian lines, but Khan had rejected all of them and stood with one that the people of Pakistan supported. 

PTI Chairman Gohar Ali Khan, flanked by Raja, criticized the military spokesperson as well, saying his press talk on Thursday had “severely disappointed” him. 

“The words that were used [by the military spokesperson] were not appropriate,” Gohar said. “Those words were wrong.”

NATURAL OUTCOME’

Speaking to reporters earlier on Saturday, Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif defended the military spokesperson’s remarks against Khan.

“When this kind of language is used for individuals as well as for institutions, then a reaction is a natural outcome,” he said. 

“The same thing is happening on the Twitter accounts being run in his [Khan’s] name. If the DG ISPR has given any reaction to it, then I believe it was a very measured reaction.”

Khan, who was ousted after a parliamentary vote of confidence in April 2022, blames the country’s powerful military for removing him from power by colluding with his political opponents. Both deny the allegations. 

The former prime minister, who has been in prison since August 2023 on a slew of charges he says are politically motivated, also alleges his party was denied victory by the army and his political rivals in the 2024 general election through rigging. 

The army and the government both deny his allegations.