Hardliners threaten judges as Pakistan awaits blasphemy ruling

Pakistani lawyers who are contesting the case against Asia Bibi, a Pakistani Christian woman convicted of blasphemy, leave the Supreme court building in Islamabad, Pakistan, on Oct. 8, 2018. (AP)
Updated 10 October 2018
Follow

Hardliners threaten judges as Pakistan awaits blasphemy ruling

  • Khan met with bishops from various churches in Pakistan on Tuesday
  • Freedom in Pakistan, however, means a life under threat by extremists

ISLAMABAD: Religious hardliners in Pakistan Wednesday threatened judges and announced protests as the country awaits a Supreme Court ruling on the fate of a Christian woman who faces becoming the first person to be executed for blasphemy.

Asia Bibi, who has been on death row since 2010, is at the centre of the high-profile case which has divided Pakistan and drawn prayers from the Vatican.

Successive appeals against her conviction have failed.

On Monday the Supreme Court heard her last appeal and said it had reached a judgement, but refused to announce it immediately "for reasons to be recorded later".

On Wednesday Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP), a hardline religious political party -- which had a strong showing in nationwide elections earlier this year -- said in a press conference aired via YouTube that if she was freed the justices responsible would meet a "horrible" end.

The group's leaders also called for mass protests on Friday.

TLP, founded in 2015, blockaded the capital Islamabad for several weeks last year calling for stricter enforcement of Pakistan's controversial blasphemy laws.

That protest forced the resignation of the federal law minister and paved the way for the group to poll more than 2.23 million votes in the July 25 general election, in what analysts called a "surprisingly" rapid rise.

Separately on Wednesday, a former spokesman for Islamabad's notorious Red Mosque moved to prevent Bibi from leaving the country by petitioning the capital's High Court to put her on the no-fly list.

That case will be heard on Friday.

"Western forces are trying to get Asia Bibi out of the country but she should be hanged," the petitioner, Hafiz Ihtesham Ahmed, told AFP.
If the court upholds Bibi's conviction, the only recourse she will have will be a mercy petition to the president.

Freedom in Pakistan, however, means a life under threat by extremists.

The mere accusation of blasphemy is so explosive in the conservative Muslim country that anyone even accused of insulting Islam risks a violent and bloody death at the hands of vigilantes.

The allegations against Bibi date back to 2009, when she was working in a field and was asked to fetch water. Muslim women she was labouring with allegedly objected, saying that as a non-Muslim she was unfit to touch the water bowl.

The women went to a local cleric and accused Bibi of blasphemy against the Prophet Mohammed.

The charge is punishable by death under legislation that rights groups say is routinely abused to settle personal vendettas.
But calls for reform have regularly been met with violence and rejected.

Pope Benedict XVI joined in international calls for Bibi's release in 2010.

In 2015 her daughter met with Pope Francis, who as the head of the Catholic Church offered prayers for her mother.

Politicians including new Prime Minister Imran Khan invoked blasphemy during this summer's election, vowing to defend the laws.
Khan met with bishops from various churches in Pakistan on Tuesday, and "stated that the constitution... provides equal rights to all citizens irrespective of cast, colour or creed and the government will continue to protect rights of the minorities", a statement from his office said.


Pakistani immigration agents express concern over US visa ban

Updated 16 January 2026
Follow

Pakistani immigration agents express concern over US visa ban

  • Trump’s administration is suspending immigrant visas for applicants from 75 countries
  • The pause will begin on January 21, a State Department spokesperson said this week

Pakistani immigration agents and members of the public expressed concern to US immigration ban on Thursday.

US President Donald Trump’s administration is suspending processing for immigrant visas for applicants from 75 countries, a State Department spokesperson said on Wednesday, as part of Washington’s intensifying immigration crackdown.

The pause, which will impact applicants from Latin American countries including Brazil, Colombia, and Uruguay, Balkan countries such as Bosnia and Albania, South Asian countries Pakistan and Bangladesh, and those from many nations in Africa, the Middle East, and the Caribbean, will begin on January 21, the spokesperson said.

“It is a matter of concern,” said travel and immigration agent, Mohammad Yaseen, in Karachi, Pakistan’s biggest city.

“All these people who were waiting for a long time for their visas to be issued, they also had an appointment date, their visas would be suspended. They will be affected by this news and this ban,” he added.

A local resident and banker, Amar Ali, said the ban will economically dent Pakistan because many Pakistanis earn and send dollars back home which boosts its economy.

Another local resident, Anwer Farooqui, urged President Trump to reconsider this decision and keep Pakistan, which is a very reliable friend of the United States, at the same level.

The cable, sent to US missions, said there were indications that nationals from these countries had sought public benefits in the United States.

The move, which was first reported by Fox News, does not impact US visitor visas, which have been in the spotlight given the United States is hosting the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics.

The decision follows a November directive to US diplomats asking them to ensure that visa applicants are financially self-sufficient and do not risk becoming dependent on government subsidies during their stay in the US, according to a State Department cable seen by Reuters at the time.

Trump has pursued a sweeping immigration crackdown since returning to office in January. His administration has aggressively prioritized immigration enforcement, sending federal agents to major US cities and sparking violent confrontations with both migrants and US citizens.