Meeting with India requested in larger interest of region — Pakistani FM

Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi claimed that India has priorities other than dialogue, adding that, “It seems that India is already preparing for its elections due in the country next year.” (REUTERS)
Updated 21 September 2018
Follow

Meeting with India requested in larger interest of region — Pakistani FM

  • A group in Delhi does not want talks to take place, alleges Qureshi
  • Pakistan extended the offer despite possessing evidence of Indian interference in Balochistan, said the FM

ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, reacting to India’s decision to cancel talks on Friday said, “Pakistan had requested for the meeting in the larger interest of the region.”
The FM claimed that India has priorities other than dialogue, adding that, “It seems that India is already preparing for its elections due in the country next year.” Speaking to local news outlet Express Tribune said, there is a group in New Delhi that does not want talks to take place.

Qureshi further stated that Islamabad would also not feel the need to respond in haste if India were to approach Pakistan for dialogue in the future. “Pakistan extended the offer despite possessing evidence of Indian interference in Balochistan,” said Qureshi.
The foreign minister reiterated dialogue is the only way to resolve issues.
A day after accepting Prime Minister Imran Khan’s invitation for a rare informal meeting, on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly (UNGA) in New York next week, India, on Friday called off the meeting.
Indian Minister of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson, Raveesh Kumar confirmed the decision to Indian media, citing the “killing of Indian security forces” allegedly by Pakistani entities and the release of postage stamps allegedly glorifying terrorists as the reasons behind the cancelation of the talks.
“Prime Minister Imran Khan’s true face is in front of us,” he said. “There is no point in holding talks with Pakistan in such an environment,” he added.
In the letter sent to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, PM Khan had proposed a meeting between Indian Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj and her Pakistani counterpart, Shah Mahmood Qureshi. He said that an informal meeting of the South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation (SAARC), on the sidelines of the UNGA, would be the ideal platform to kick-start dialogue.
While Kumar confirmed that India had agreed to Pakistan’s request for a meeting, he was quick to clarify when he said, on Thursday, that “This should not be confused with the resumption of any dialogue; this is just a meeting on the request of Pakistan. This does not indicate any change in our policy as far as our stand on terrorism and cross-border terrorism is concerned.”
The meeting was scheduled to be held on September 27.
Earlier today, the United States had also welcomed the meeting between Pakistan and Indian Foreign Ministers in New York, expressing hope that the stage for a “good, strong relationship between the two neighbors” would be set.
Information Minister of Pakistan Fawad Chaudhry said in a tweet following India’s decision ” The world is watching, Pakistan stands for peace, while Indian policies are being guided by extremist ideologies.”


At least 13 civilians killed in Pakistan strikes in Afghanistan, UN says

Updated 23 February 2026
Follow

At least 13 civilians killed in Pakistan strikes in Afghanistan, UN says

  • Pakistan said it launched the strikes after blaming recent suicide attacks on militants operating from Afghan territory
  • The reported toll adds to fears of a renewed cycle of retaliation between the neighbors, threatening a fragile ceasefire

ISLAMABAD/KABUL: At least 13 civilians ‌were killed and seven injured in Pakistani airstrikes in eastern Afghanistan, the United Nations said on Monday, as cross-border tensions escalated following a string ​of suicide bombings in Pakistan.

The reported toll adds to fears of a renewed cycle of retaliation between the neighbors, threatening a fragile ceasefire along their 2,600-km (1,600-mile) frontier and further straining ties as both sides trade blame over militant violence.

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) said it had received “credible reports” that overnight Pakistani airstrikes on February 21–22 killed at least 13 ‌civilians and injured ‌seven in the Behsud and Khogyani ​districts ‌of ⁠Nangarhar province.

Taliban ​spokesman Zabihullah ⁠Mujahid earlier reported dozens killed or wounded in the strikes, which also hit locations in Paktika province. Reuters could not independently verify the reported toll.

Pakistan said it launched the strikes after blaming recent suicide attacks, including during Ramadan, on militants operating from Afghan territory.

Pakistan’s information ministry in a post on X said ⁠the “intelligence-based” operation struck seven camps of the Pakistani Taliban ‌and Daesh (Islamic State) Khorasan Province ‌and that it had “conclusive evidence” the militant ​assaults on Pakistan were directed ‌by “Afghanistan-based leadership and handlers.”

Kabul has repeatedly denied allowing militants ‌to use Afghan territory to launch attacks in Pakistan.

The strikes took place days after Kabul released three Pakistani soldiers in a Saudi-mediated exchange aimed at easing months of tensions along the border.

Afghanistan’s defense ministry condemned ‌the strikes and called them a violation of sovereignty and international law, saying an “appropriate and measured ⁠response will ⁠be taken at a suitable time.” The Afghan foreign ministry said it had summoned Pakistan’s ambassador.

In a statement on the February 21-22 strikes, Afghanistan’s education ministry said eight school students; five boys and three girls, were killed in Behsud in Nangarhar province, and one madrasa student injured in Barmal in Paktika province, adding that dozens of other civilians were killed or wounded and educational centers destroyed. Reuters could not independently verify the information.

The latest strikes follow months of clashes and repeated border closures ​that have disrupted trade ​and movement along the rugged frontier.