ISLAMABAD: For 22 years, the charismatic cricket legend-turned-politician Imran Khan struggled for ascension to Pakistan’s most coveted chair of power, the throne of the prime minister of nuclear-armed Pakistan. Now he is slated to assume that position after being sworn in on Aug. 18.
Khan overcame the most daunting obstacles in his perilous journey, said Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf insiders (PTI) who have witnessed many shades of his emotions battling personal to political affairs.
PTI emerging victorious in the 2018 general elections, ostensibly ushering in an era of “change” that broke the chains of a country locked in a status quo, has spread an aura of hope among the masses who used their mandate to vote in the rookie party.
Will the PTI chief fare better than his predecessors, most of whom succumbed to Pakistan’s violent and unmerciful politics in their alleged self-vested endeavour to achieve and hold reign?
The question may be premature but Khan will be put through the test of time, face difficult choices, make impossible decisions and be mindful of not falling victim to the unscrupulous political playground, institutional tugs-of-war, and infectious corruption that has tainted seven decades of Pakistan’s complex history.
“Imran Khan has built a political party on the basis of a difficult and tricky proposition: that the core of Pakistan’s problem is the corruption of public figures and government officials,” Mosharraf Zaidi, an ex-government adviser and seasoned analyst, told Arab News.
“If he were to pursue the issue whilst he is in power, he will have conflicts with every institution in the country, from within his party, to judges, bureaucrats and members of the military.”
The fight for captaincy to steer Pakistan democratically has been derailed four times by military interventions directly and indirectly.
In its disturbing history, one premier was murdered, another hanged by the judiciary, others dismissed by presidents, and two removed by judicial order, including the imprisoned ex-premier Nawaz Sharif and his family. Not one premier has ever completed a full term in office.
The bloodstained and unsparing politics of Pakistan have resulted in the deaths of many notable politicians in police encounters, by assassins, terrorists, security operations or in mysterious circumstances. The lucky few opted for self-imposed exile or were forced to flee the country.
This will not be the fate of Khan, say analysts.
“He is different from the rest of the politicians. He has no foreign assets, no corruption charges and no family to start hereditary politics,” said political expert Dr. Nazir Hussain.
“He has fought the election with a vision and has galvanized the youth and middle class while traditional politicians have been rejected by the masses.”
Khan’s major challenge is a dire economy on a brink of collapse. “If he can manage the economy, that would greatest achievement — even if he meets 25 percent of his targets, he will be successful,” said Hussain.
The public's optimism about Khan and his party's ability to govern the country is widespread. On the social media spectrum there is clear division between Khan’s destroyers and defenders, the latter being in larger numbers. His detractors, especially those who lost their electoral seats, have labelled him a military puppet but experts dismiss those accusations.
Analyst Qamar Cheema said Khan’s victory has upset the political balance maintained by political dynasties, religious parties, and veteran politicians. The PTI’s success has been a bitter pill to swallow for those who can’t accept the fact they lost their bastion constituencies.
“Frustration was visible among all political parties but those who are out of the race are more frustrated and isolated. Khan has been given the chance to change political culture and bring change in the social fabric with policies which others could not offer,” Cheema told Arab News.
Zaidi’s advice to Khan is “to approach the governance challenge from a technical rather than a political perspective. He will discover that the country’s primary problem is the absence of the will, capacity and resources to do better. If he brings the will, the capacity and resources will follow. Corruption will be reduced as a direct consequence of the change in the state’s priorities.
“In short, Khan can be very successful if he invests himself in solving the problems of ordinary Pakistanis — rather than chasing mirages,” said Zaidi.
Can Imran Khan last in Pakistan’s most powerful and perilous position?
Can Imran Khan last in Pakistan’s most powerful and perilous position?
- Analysts predict Khan is likely to fare better than his predecessors
- No prime minister has completed a full term in office
Prabowo, Trump expected to sign Indonesia-US tariff deal in January 2026
- Deal will mean US tariffs on Indonesian products are cut from a threatened 32 percent to 19 percent
- Jakarta committed to scrap tariffs on more than 99 percent of US goods
JAKARTA: Indonesia expects to sign a tariff deal with the US in early 2026 after reaching an agreement on “all substantive issues,” Jakarta's chief negotiator said on Tuesday.
Indonesia’s Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs Airlangga Hartarto met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Washington this week to finalize an Indonesia-US trade deal, following a series of discussions that took place after the two countries agreed on a framework for negotiations in July.
“All substantive issues laid out in the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade have been agreed upon by the two sides, including both the main and technical issues,” Hartarto said in an online briefing.
Officials from both countries are now working to set up a meeting between Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto and US President Donald Trump.
It will take place after Indonesian and US technical teams meet in the second week of January for a legal scrubbing, or a final clean-up of an agreement text.
“We are expecting that the upcoming technical process will wrap up in time as scheduled, so that at the end of January 2026 President Prabowo and President Trump can sign the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade,” Hartarto said.
Indonesian trade negotiators have been in “intensive” talks with their Washington counterparts since Trump threatened to levy a 32 percent duty on Indonesian exports.
Under the July framework, US tariffs on Indonesian imports were lowered to 19 percent, with Jakarta committing to measures to balance trade with Washington, including removing tariffs on more than 99 percent of American imports and scrapping all non-tariff barriers facing American companies.
Jakarta also pledged to import $15 billion worth of energy products and $4.5 billion worth of agricultural products such as soybeans, wheat and cotton, from the US.
“Indonesia will also get tariff exemptions on top Indonesian goods, such as palm oil, coffee, cocoa,” Hartarto said.
“This is certainly good news, especially for Indonesian industries directly impacted by the tariff policy, especially labor-intensive sectors that employ around 5 million workers.”
In the past decade, Indonesia has consistently posted trade surpluses with the US, its second-largest export market after China.
From January to October, data from the Indonesian trade ministry showed two-way trade valued at nearly $36.2 billion, with Jakarta posting a $14.9 billion surplus.









