Lebanon’s shoreline: where garbage rules and endangered turtles are struggling to lay their eggs

Zouk Mosbeh beach, north of Beirut, in January.
Updated 26 July 2018
Follow

Lebanon’s shoreline: where garbage rules and endangered turtles are struggling to lay their eggs

  • “We don’t need an environmental minister who understands the environment, we need an environmentally-friendly government
  • Lebanon gained worldwide notoriety in summer 2015 for the garbage crisis that began when the Naamah landfill site reached capacity and was closed

DUBAI: Lebanon is getting used to making headlines worldwide for its littered beaches and streets piled high with rubbish. Now a fifth of its beaches have been declared “unfit for swimming,” in a recent report by the National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS).

At a press conference last week, Mouin Hamze, the council’s secretary-general, announced that the 30-page report had found that “five of the 25 points surveyed were described as very polluted and not fit for swimming, while a further four were deemed acceptable and 16 deemed good.”
Those areas included Beirut’s only public beach, Ramlet Al-Bayda, and beaches in Antelias, Manara and Tripoli.
“Why isn’t the government serious about the clean-up of the Mediterranean Sea in Lebanon?” asked Paul Abi Rached, the founder of T.E.R.R.E. Liban, an environmental NGO.
“The government opens sea dumps on purpose. They keep the waste-water treatment plants closed. We have between 30 and 50 wastewater treatment plants that are closed.
“It’s unacceptable to leave sewage and solid waste lying in the ocean when they’ve signed the Barcelona Convention,” Abi Rached added.
Lebanon signed up to the Barcelona Convention in 1995, along with 15 other Mediterranean countries. The convention now has 22 entities signed up “to protect the Mediterranean marine and coastal environment while boosting regional and national plans to achieve sustainable development.”
Among the priorities for the 22 signatories are to “bring about a massive reduction in pollution from land-based sources” and “protect marine and coastal habitats and threatened species.” Both appear to be a long way from being implemented.
“The only way to solve this is to declare an environmental state of emergency,” said Abi Rached, who is also president of the Lebanon Eco Movement.
“We don’t need an environmental minister who understands the environment, we need an environmentally-friendly government — it’s the only solution for Lebanon.”
Lebanon gained worldwide notoriety in summer 2015 for the garbage crisis that began when the Naamah landfill site reached capacity and was closed. For months afterwards, with no alternative site, Beirut’s streets were filled with piles of rubbish that stretched for miles.
In January this year, the crisis resurfaced as rubbish was found strewn across a Lebanese beach, believed to have been washed down by stormy weather from a nearby landfill site on the coast, although the government denies this claim. Images of the beach, blanketed in rubbish, were shared on social media, fueling anger among residents and politicians.
A toxicology report by the Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute warned of sewage waste and found high concentrations of chemical and bacterial contamination, including large levels of mercury, copper, lead and cadmium.

Fishermen across the country are also protesting about the continuous pollution that is affecting the livelihoods that they depend on.
“Generally speaking, I am seeing that the beach is looking filthier and filthier by the day,” local diver Abdel Fattah Amhaz told Arab News.
“No one in Lebanon is abiding by the rules and taking care of the cleanliness of the beach.
“You have joggers running and throwing their trash in the sea, and the garbage dumps across the coast are leaking into the sea,” he said.
Amhaz added that various types of marine animals that used to be seen and caught in the sea are no longer found, with the main cause being heavy pollution and its effects on the ecosystem.
To illustrate his point about the declining marine life, Amhaz said that when he was a boy, as he and his friends walked along the seashore in Beirut they would feel the sea urchin shells prickling their feet. Now there is nothing.
“They transferred the sewers to our beach to displace us. We voted for you to fight corruption, but
instead, you’re fighting us,” said Idrees Atrees, head of the fishermen’s syndicate, addressing politicians in televised remarks to local media.
Many have been unable to fish as wastewater is being redirected from central Beirut to Jnah’s seaside, which has been causing the fishermen to change fishing locations several times to avoid sewage.
While all eyes may be on Lebanon for not taking care of its seashore, reports surfaced in Morocco earlier this week about the dire garbage situation on the country’s coast, stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to the Mediterranean Sea.
Despite a 2016 nationwide ban on plastic bags, rubbish still keeps piling up on the shores across the North African country, despite authorities keeping a strict and close eye on its implementation.
An analysis of 165 beaches at the start of the summer season showed 97 percent of waters “conform with microbiological standards,” compared to 72 percent in 2002, according to the Moroccan secretary of state for the environment.


Sudan defense minister dismisses ‘intelligence document’ as fabrication after convoy strike

Updated 12 February 2026
Follow

Sudan defense minister dismisses ‘intelligence document’ as fabrication after convoy strike

  • Gen. Hassan Kabroun tells Arab News claims that army hid weapons in aid convoy are “completely false”

RIYADH: Sudan’s defense minister has firmly denied reports attributed to Sudanese intelligence alleging that a convoy targeted in North Kordofan was secretly transporting weapons under the cover of humanitarian aid.

Gen. Hassan Kabroun described the claims as “false” and an attempt to distract from what he called a militia crime.

The controversy erupted after news reports emerged that a document attributed to Sudan’s General Intelligence Service claimed the convoy struck in Al-Rahad on Friday was not a purely humanitarian mission, but was instead carrying “high-quality weapons and ammunition” destined for Sudanese Armed Forces units operating in the state.

The report further alleged that the convoy had been outwardly classified as humanitarian in order to secure safe passage through conflict zones, and that the Rapid Support Forces had destroyed it after gathering intelligence on its route and cargo.

Kabroun categorically rejected the narrative.

“First of all, we would like to stress the fact that this news is false,” he told Arab News. “Even the headline that talks about the security of the regions, such as Al-Dabbah, is not a headline the army would use.”

He described the document as fabricated and politically motivated, saying it was designed to “cover up the heinous crime they committed.”

The minister affirmed that the area targeted by drones is under full control of the Sudanese Armed Forces and does not require any covert military transport.

“Second, we confirm that the region that was targeted by drones is controlled by the army and very safe,” Kabroun said. “It does not require transporting any military equipment using aid convoys as decoys because it is a safe area controlled by the army, which has significant capabilities to transport humanitarian aid.”

According to the minister, the Sudanese military has both the logistical capacity and secure routes necessary to move equipment openly when needed.

“The army is professional and does not need to deliver anything to Kadugli or Dalang on board aid convoys,” he said. “The road between Dalang and Kadugli is open. The Sudanese forces used that road to enter and take control of the region. The road is open and whenever military trucks need to deliver anything, they can do so without resorting to any form of camouflage.”

Kabroun further rejected any suggestion that the military uses humanitarian operations as cover.

“Aid is transported by dedicated relief vehicles to the areas in need of this assistance,” he said. “Aid is not transported by the army. The army and security apparatus do not interfere with relief efforts at all, and do not even accompany the convoys.”

He stressed that the Sudanese Armed Forces maintains a clear institutional separation between military operations and humanitarian work, particularly amid the country’s crisis.

“These are false claims,” he said. “This fake news wanted to cover up the heinous crime they committed.”

Sudan has been gripped by conflict since April 2023, when fighting broke out between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces, plunging the country into what the United Nations has described as one of the world’s worst humanitarian disasters.

The latest dispute over the convoy comes amid intensified fighting in South Kordofan, a strategically sensitive region linking central Sudan with the contested areas of Darfur and Blue Nile.

The false report suggested that intelligence monitoring had enabled the RSF to strike what it described as a military convoy disguised as humanitarian aid. But Kabroun dismissed that version outright.

“The intelligence agency is well aware of its duties,” he said. “The Sudanese Army has enough weapons and equipment to use in the areas of operations. These claims are completely false.”

He argued that the narrative being circulated seeks to shift blame for attacks on civilian infrastructure and humanitarian movements.

“This shows that they are trying to cover up the atrocities,” he added, referring to the militia.

Kabroun maintained that the army has regained momentum on multiple fronts and remains fully capable of sustaining its operations without resorting to deception.

“The region is secure, the roads are open, and the army does not need camouflage,” he said. “We are operating professionally and transparently.”

“These claims are completely false,” Kabroun said. “The Sudanese Army does not use humanitarian convoys for military purposes.”