ANALYSIS: Yes, he Khan … but now the real battle begins

Pakistani politician Imran Khan, chief of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party, arrives to address an election campaign rally in Islamabad, Pakistan, on July 21, 2018. (AP/file)
Updated 26 July 2018
Follow

ANALYSIS: Yes, he Khan … but now the real battle begins

  • As no party seems likely to win an overall majority, the PTI must form a coalition
  • Khan’s coalition will face strong opposition from the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz and the Pakistan Peoples Party

ISLAMABAD: Imran Khan is likely to become the next prime minister of Pakistan, with unofficial results on Wednesday night showing his Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaf (PTI) ahead in the election race.

While the international community wants to know more about the foreign policy of this unknown actor in the international political arena, challenges at home are more likely to test his mettle.

As no party seems likely to win an overall majority, the PTI must form a coalition, probably with independent candidates or the religious parties’ alliance, the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal. 

Though the PTI is a center-right party, it is also home to many leftists and liberals, and may struggle to find common ground with the right wing after agreeing with religious parties on issues such as the blasphemy law and legislation relating to women; Khan may be pragmatic and meet the ultra-right half way, but that is not what many of his supporters want to see.

Joining hands with independent candidates — mainly the “Jeep” party of the former Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, who is bound to have a long list of demands — would also raise eyebrows in the PTI ranks.  

Khan’s coalition will face strong opposition from the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz and the Pakistan Peoples Party, and might exhaust its strength in striking a balance between political allies and strong competitors who have each ruled the country three times before.

Against these challenges, Khan may be more engaged in keeping his house of cards standing than in delivering on the promises with which he wooed the nation.

Being prime minister, with his own priorities, will test Khan’s relations with Pakistan’s strongest institution — the army. 

He has often said he views the military as the most organized and corruption-free institution of the state, but finding a balance of priorities could soon end the honeymoon period.     

The cricketer-turned-politician has dreamed of this day since he left sport for politics. He will have to chart a judicious course, or his first steps in the corridors of power could be his last.   

 


UN’s top court opens Myanmar Rohingya genocide case

Updated 14 min 8 sec ago
Follow

UN’s top court opens Myanmar Rohingya genocide case

  • The Gambia filed a case against Myanmar at the UN’s top court in 2019
  • Verdict expected to impact Israel’s genocide case over war on Gaza

DHAKA: The International Court of Justice on Monday opened a landmark case accusing Myanmar of genocide against its mostly Muslim Rohingya minority.

The Gambia filed a case against Myanmar at the UN’s top court in 2019, two years after a military offensive forced hundreds of thousands of Rohingya from their homes into neighboring Bangladesh.

The hearings will last three weeks and conclude on Jan. 29.

“The ICJ must secure justice for the persecuted Rohingya. This process should not take much longer, as we all know that justice delayed is justice denied,” said Asma Begum, who has been living in the Kutupalong refugee camp in Bangladesh’s Cox’s Bazar district since 2017.

A mostly Muslim ethnic minority, the Rohingya have lived for centuries in Myanmar’s western Rakhine state but were stripped of their citizenship in the 1980s and have faced systemic persecution ever since.

In 2017 alone, some 750,000 of them fled military atrocities and crossed to Bangladesh, in what the UN has called a textbook case of ethnic cleansing by Myanmar.

Today, about 1.3 million Rohingya shelter in 33 camps in Cox’s Bazar, turning the coastal district into the world’s largest refugee settlement.

“We experienced horrific acts such as arson, killings and rape in 2017, and fled to Bangladesh,” Begum told Arab News.

“I believe the ICJ verdict will pave the way for our repatriation to our homeland. The world should not forget us.”

A UN fact-finding mission has concluded that the Myanmar 2017 offensive included “genocidal acts” — an accusation rejected by Myanmar, which said it was a “clearance operation” against militants.

Now, there is hope for justice and a new future for those who have been displaced for years.

“We also have the right to live with dignity. I want to return to my homeland and live the rest of my life in my ancestral land. My children will reconnect with their roots and be able to build their own future,” said Syed Ahmed, who fled Myanmar in 2017 and has since been raising his four children in the Kutupalong camp.

“Despite the delay, I am optimistic that the perpetrators will be held accountable through the ICJ verdict. It will set a strong precedent for the world.”

The Myanmar trial is the first genocide case in more than a decade to be taken up by the ICJ. The outcome will also impact the genocide case that Israel is facing over its war on Gaza.

“The momentum of this case at the ICJ will send a strong message to all those (places) around the world where crimes against humanity have been committed,” Nur Khan, a Bangladeshi lawyer and human rights activist, told Arab News.

“The ICJ will play a significant role in ensuring justice regarding accusations of genocide in other parts of the world, such as the genocide and crimes against humanity committed by Israel against the people of Gaza.”