Bangladesh PM vows to continue anti-drug operations

This photo taken on May 18, 2018 shows the body of a suspected Bangladeshi drug dealer after a gun battle with law enforcers in Chittagong. (AFP)
Updated 31 May 2018
Follow

Bangladesh PM vows to continue anti-drug operations

  • Over 120 people have been killed and at least 10,000 arrested since the Bangladeshi police started countrywide anti-drug operations on May 14.
  • Advocate Sultana Kamal, renowned human rights activist and the chairperson of Transparency International Bangladesh, has urged that any kind of extrajudicial killing should stop.

DHAKA: Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has said no one involved with drug dealing in the country will be spared in the country’s “war on drugs.” She was addressing a news conference on Wednesday afternoon at her official residence Ganabhaban.

One hundred and twenty-three people have been killed during the ongoing “war” in the past 15 days. The police in Bangladesh started countrywide anti-drug operations on May 14, directed by the Inspector General of Police to run an all-out war against the drug dealers.

Human rights activists of the country urged the government to protect the fundamental rights of the people, calling the killings “extrajudicial.” 

The latest “shootout” incidents on Tuesday night took another 15 lives of alleged drug peddlers throughout the country. The authorities have said they will continue the anti-drug movement until the drug trafficking situation comes under control.

During the press conference Hasina stressed that there were no innocent people who had been victimized in this “war” as the law enforcers’ operations were based on long-term intelligence information. 

“Show me an incident where an innocent person has been victimized (during the drive). We’ll surely take steps if any innocent person falls victim to the drive,” she said.

She also stressed the need to continue the anti-narcotic crackdown as drug addiction was a social problem for the country. “Drugs spread like a disease in the society … Nobody will be spared, however influential he may be,” Hasina added. “We must root out the curse of drugs from the society … If some incident takes place during a drive, and if you (the media) highlight it, then shall we stop them (the raids)?”

During the press briefing, she said the security agencies had arrested at least 10,000 people in connection with drug dealing. 

“Operations will continue until we have control of the situation,” says Asadujjaman Khan, home minister. He said that so far there was no certain time frame to end the “war” on drugs. “We will do all we can. Nothing has been finalized. We will do what we feel is best.” 

Advocate Sultana Kamal, renowned human rights activist and the chairperson of Transparency International Bangladesh, has urged that any kind of extrajudicial killing should stop. 

She told Arab News: “The state should stop all these extrajudicial killings since they are contrary to our constitution and the conventional law of the country.” 

She said that earlier she and her colleagues had even approached the court for a resolution to stop the extrajudicial killing. The court wanted to know why extrajudicial killings should not be declared illegal. But unfortunately the government did not reply till now. Kamal said: “The persons responsible for these killings should be brought to justice.” 

The country’s main opposition party, the BNP, is seeing the ongoing anti-drug operations as a political move by the ruling party Awamileague. 

Barrister Rumin Farhana, assistant foreign affairs secretary of the BNP, said: “In the name of the anti-drug operations the police in many areas were taking bribes from people, and later on the victims were put into ‘crossfire.’ We have reported two such cases in the past couple of days.” 

She said that no country in the world had succeeded in handing drug-dealing through extrajudicial killing. This approach has failed in the Philippines and Mexico. Farhana believes drugs cannot be completely wiped out from society. But we can control the problem. 

“Since it is a general election year, the government is trying to intimidate the opposition supporters and leaders through this anti-drug crackdown,” Farhana said. She considers this movement a “stunt approach” of the government to earn “quick popularity.”


After accepting US deportees, South Sudan wanted sanctions relief for top official, documents show

Updated 1 sec ago
Follow

After accepting US deportees, South Sudan wanted sanctions relief for top official, documents show

JUBA: After agreeing to accept deportees from the United States last year, South Sudan sent a list of requests to Washington that included American support for the prosecution of an opposition leader and sanctions relief for a senior official accused of diverting over a billion dollars in public funds.
The requests, contained in a pair of diplomatic communications made public by the State Department this month, offer a glimpse into the kind of benefits that some governments may have sought as they negotiated with the US over the matter of receiving deportees.
In the documents, the US expresses “appreciation” to South Sudan for accepting the deportees and details the names, nationalities and crimes for which each individual was convicted.
In July, South Sudan became the first African country to receive third-country deportees from the US Rwanda, Eswatini, Ghana and Equatorial Guinea have since received deportees.
The eight deportees to South Sudan included nationals of Mexico, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar and South Sudan itself.
Contentious deportations
They arrived in the South Sudanese capital of Juba after spending weeks on a US military base in Djibouti, where they were held after a US court temporarily blocked their deportation. Six of the eight men remain at a residential facility in Juba under the supervision of security personnel.
South Sudanese national Dian Peter Domach was later freed, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, while Jesus Munoz-Gutierrez, a Mexican, was repatriated in September.
South Sudanese officials have not publicly said what long-term plan is in place for those still in custody. The third-country deportations were highly contentious, criticized by rights groups and others who expressed concern South Sudan would become a dumping ground.
Details of the deal between the US and South Sudan remain murky. It is still unclear what, if anything, South Sudan may have actually received or been promised. The documents only offer a glimpse into what the South Sudanese government hoped to get in return.
In other cases, Human Rights Watch said it saw documents showing the US agreed to pay Rwanda’s government around $7.5 million to take up to 250 deportees. The US will give Eswatini $5.1 million to take up to 160 deportees, according to the group.
For South Sudan, in one communication dated May 12 and marked confidential, South Sudan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs raised eight “matters of concern which the Government of South Sudan believes merit consideration.” These ranged from the easing of visa restrictions for South Sudanese nationals to the construction of a rehabilitation center and “support in addressing the problem of armed civilians.”
Request to lift sanctions
But an eye-catching ask was for the lifting of US sanctions against former Vice President Benjamin Bol Mel as well as Washington’s support for the prosecution of opposition leader Riek Machar, the now-suspended first vice president of South Sudan who faces treason, murder and other criminal charges in a controversial case.
The allegations against Machar stem from a violent incident in March, when an armed militia with historical ties to him attacked a garrison of government troops. Machar’s supporters and some activists describe the charges as politically motivated.
Bol Mel is accused of diverting more than a billion dollars earmarked for infrastructure projects into companies he owns or controls, according to a UN report. He wielded vast influence in the government and was touted by some as Kiir’s likely successor in the presidency until he was dismissed and placed under house arrest in November.
Bol Mel was also viewed as a key figure behind the prosecution of Machar, one of the historical leaders of South Sudan’s ultimately successful quest for independence from Sudan in 2011.
Machar was Kiir’s deputy when they fell out in 2013, provoking the start of civil war as government troops loyal to Kiir fought forces loyal to Machar.
A 2018 peace agreement brought Machar back into government as the most senior of five vice presidents. His prosecution has been widely criticized as a violation of that agreement, and has coincided with a spike in violence that the UN says killed more than 1,800 people between January and September 2025.
The UN has also warned that a resurgence of fighting has brought the country “back to the edge of a relapse into civil war.” Machar is under house arrest in Juba while his criminal trial proceeds slowly.
In its communications with the US, South Sudan also asked for sanctions to be lifted over South Sudanese oil companies “to encourage direct foreign investments,” and for the US to consider investing in other sectors including fossil fuels, minerals and agriculture.
When asked if the US government had provided or promised South Sudan anything in return for accepting the deportees, a State Department official said, “In keeping with standard diplomatic practice, we do not disclose the details of private discussions.”
A spokesman for South Sudan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Thomas Kenneth Elisapana, declined to comment.
US aid cuts
Despite accepting the US request to admit deportees, relations between the two governments have been strained in recent months.
In December, the US threatened to reduce aid contributions to the country, accusing the government of imposing fees on aid groups and obstructing their operations.
The US has historically been one of the largest donors to South Sudan, providing roughly $9.5 billion in aid since 2011. Over the years, South Sudan’s government has struggled to deliver many of the basic services of a state, and years of conflict have left the country heavily reliant on foreign aid.