Formal inquiry against Bahria Town projects launched — NAB

Updated 22 May 2018
Follow

Formal inquiry against Bahria Town projects launched — NAB

  • Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan — who headed the bench that heard the cases against Bahria Town — drew the attention of the Chief Justice of Pakistan Saqib Nisar to allegations of land being allotted to DHA.
  • The apex court also struck down a “mutual encroachment deal” between Bahria Town and the forest department where Bahria Town, in the Takht Pari area near Islamabad.

ISLAMABAD: With direct orders from the Supreme Court, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) released a statement on Monday stating that formal investigations against Bahria Town Karachi, Lahore and Rawalpindi had been officially launched by the watchdog.
On May 4, the Supreme Court, in three different verdicts against the real estate empire, declared the procurement of land by Bahria Town, for its housing projects in Karachi, Rawalpindi and Murree, “null and void,” noting that significant transfers and allotments of land to each project had taken place illegally. Subsequently, the apex court ordered NAB to file references against the individuals responsible for the transfers and to take action against them within three months.
Chairman NAB Javed Iqbal directed the relevant authorities to complete their investigation within the specified period, in line with the court’s directions.
In response to queries by local media, NAB explained that its investigation in the New Murree Development Scheme was already complete and that the new initiative was against Bahria Town Lahore, in which they were to investigate whether or not there were any irregularities in that project.
Previously, the apex court barred Bahria Town Karachi from selling or allotting land in the said project after declaring the allotment of land to the company by the Sindh government and a massive land swap with the Malir Development Authority (MDA) illegal.
“We are constrained to declare that the grant of the land to the MDA, its exchange with the land of Bahria Town and anything done pursuant thereto being against the provisions of COGLA 1912 (Colonization of Government Lands Act 1912) and statement of conditions are void ab initio and as such have no existence,” the court ruled. The court ordered the land belonging to the government, exchanged with Bahria Town, be given back to the government and vice versa.
The apex court also struck down a “mutual encroachment deal” between Bahria Town and the forest department where Bahria Town, in the Takht Pari area near Islamabad, was encroaching upon 1,170 kanals of forest land, while the forest department had “encroached” on an area measuring 765 kanals of Bahria Town, deeming it illegal and of no effect.
We declare that “the area of Takht Pari is 2,210 acres; that exchange of land purportedly encroached by Bahria Town and the forest department and attestation of mutations in this behalf being based on an erroneous assumption about the area is against the law and the record and as such of no effect and the order passed in S.M.C.No. 3 of 2009 is recalled.”
The court also took notice of the alleged irregular allotment of land to the Defense Housing Authority (DHA).
Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan — who headed the bench which heard the cases against Bahria Town — drew the attention of Chief Justice of Pakistan Saqib Nisar to allegations of land being allotted to the DHA and many other societies on throwaway rates in contravention of the law. He further requested the CJP to take suo moto notice if the allegations proved true and to treat them alike.


Russia says foreign forces in Ukraine would be ‘legitimate targets’

Updated 03 February 2026
Follow

Russia says foreign forces in Ukraine would be ‘legitimate targets’

  • Moscow has repeatedly said it will not tolerate the presence in Ukraine of troops from Western countries

MOSCOW: Russia would regard the deployment of any foreign military forces or infrastructure in Ukraine as foreign intervention and treat those forces as legitimate ​targets, the Foreign Ministry said on Monday, citing Minister Sergei Lavrov.
The ministry’s comment, one of many it said were in response to questions put to Lavrov, also praised US President Donald Trump’s efforts at working for a resolution of the war and said he understood the fundamental reasons behind the conflict.
“The deployment of ‌military units, facilities, ‌warehouses, and other infrastructure of ‌Western ⁠countries ​in Ukraine ‌is unacceptable to us and will be regarded as foreign intervention posing a direct threat to Russia’s security,” the ministry said on its website.
It said Western countries — which have discussed a possible deployment to Ukraine to help secure any peace deal — had to understand “that all foreign military contingents, including German ⁠ones, if deployed in Ukraine, will become legitimate targets for the Russian ‌Armed Forces.”
The United States has spearheaded ‍efforts to hold talks aimed ‍at ending the conflict in Ukraine and a second three-sided ‍meeting with Russian and Ukrainian representatives is to take place this week in the United Arab Emirates.
The issue of ceding internationally recognized Ukrainian territory to Russia remains a major stumbling block. ​Kyiv rejects Russian calls for it to give up all of its Donbas region, including territory Moscow’s ⁠forces have not captured.
Moscow has repeatedly said it will not tolerate the presence in Ukraine of troops from Western countries.
The ministry said Moscow valued the “purposeful efforts” of the Trump administration in working toward a resolution and understanding Russia’s long-running concerns about NATO’s eastward expansion and its overtures to Ukraine.
It described Trump as “one of the few Western politicians who not only immediately refused to advance meaningless and destructive preconditions for starting a substantive dialogue with Moscow on the ‌Ukrainian crisis, but also publicly spoke about its root causes.”