ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s National Security Committee (NSC), the country’s top civil-military body, called former Premier Nawaz Sharif’s statement on the 2008 Mumbai attacks “incorrect and misleading” after its session on Monday.
“The meeting reviewed the recent statement in the context of the Mumbai attacks, as it appeared in the Daily Dawn of 12th May 2018, and unanimously termed this statement as incorrect and misleading,” said an official handout released by the government after the meeting.
Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi chaired the meeting at Prime Minister’s House attended by all three services chiefs, including Chief of Army Staff Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa and Director General Inter-Services Intelligence Lt. Gen. Naveed Mukhtar, as well as other senior civil and military officials.
“The participants observed that it was very unfortunate that the opinion arising out of either misconceptions or grievances was being presented in disregard of concrete facts and realities,” the official statement said.
The participants of the meeting also “unanimously rejected the allegations and condemned the fallacious assertions.”
Sharif on Saturday questioned the role of militant outfits in cross-border terrorism in his interview published in Dawn newspaper. This was played up by Indian media as an admission by Pakistan of its involvement in Mumbai attacks.
“Militant organizations are active. Call them non-state actors, should we allow them to cross the border and kill 150 people in Mumbai? Explain it to me. Why can’t we complete the trial?” Nawaz Sharif said in the interview.
The NSC meeting, however, accused India of delay in finalization of the cases against alleged Lashkar-e-Taiba’s militants who attacked installations in Mumbai in November 2008.
“Besides many other refusals (by India) during the investigation, the denial of access to the principal accused, Ajmal Kasab, and his extraordinarily hurried execution became the core impediment in the finalization of the trial (here in Pakistan),” the statement said.
Earlier, Pakistan’s major opposition parties, including Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), also lambasted Sharif for his “irresponsible” statement and demanded that he retract it.
Fawad Chaudhry, secretary of information for PTI, said that Sharif was trying to appease the international establishment through his "anti-Pakistan" statements.
“Nawaz Sharif has fired a bullet at Pakistan and state institutions,” he told Arab News.
PTI legislator Khurram Sher Zaman on Monday submitted a resolution in the Sindh Assembly seeking a “ban on the broadcast of Nawaz Sharif’s statements and speeches” as these had “given comfort and propaganda points to all enemies of Pakistan.”
Political analyst Qamar Cheema told Arab News: “There is deep divide between the establishment and Nawaz Sharif and to damage the establishment Nawaz tried to give an impression that non-state actors are still being used by the Pakistani establishment as state policy.”
He said that it was the individual conduct of some militants who attacked different buildings in Mumbai, and “Pakistan is already prosecuting all of the suspects involved in the attack.”
Shortly after the National Security Committee meeting, Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi said: “Nawaz Sharif was misquoted by the Indian media.”
Addressing a press conference in Islamabad, the prime minister said: “Some parts of the statement attributed to Nawaz Sharif are not true.”
However, local news channels criticized him for going against the earlier NSC statement and creating further ambiguity. Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah owned Nawaz Sharif’s statement and publicly defended his position while talking to the media in Lahore.
He said that Sharif had made the statement in the “greater national interest,” adding he was not the first Pakistani who had raised these concerns about the Mumbai attacks. He claimed that the former prime minister’s rivals were targeting him to gain political mileage ahead of the general elections.
Sanaullah also lashed out at the country’s security establishment: “One general comes into power and creates ‘mujahideen;’ the other takes over power and declares them terrorists.” He added such political antics could not be allowed in the country anymore.
The Punjab law minister’s media talk was followed by Sharif’s public rally in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’s Buner city, during which he remained unfazed and unapologetic.
The former prime minister wondered why there was no accountability of generals who overthrew democratically-elected governments and undermined the constitution of the country while politicians who worked for Pakistan and its people were labelled as traitors.
Sharif also challenged his detractors to form a “national commission” to look into his statement, saying that the same authority should also bring together those individuals who were calling him a traitor so that the people of Pakistan could see who was right and who was wrong.
“Whoever is found guilty,” he said while addressing a roaring crowd, “hang him publicly.”
![]()
Sharif statement roils Pakistan’s top civil-military brass
Sharif statement roils Pakistan’s top civil-military brass
- Sharif challenges detractors to form 'national commission' to look into his statement
- Some parts of the statement attributed to Nawaz Sharif not true, says PM Shahid Khaqan Abbasi
Hong Kong firm begins arbitration proceedings over ruling against its Panama Canal port contract
- The Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997
- US Secretary of State Marco Rubio views the operation of the ports as a national security issue
HONG KONG: Hong Kong’s CK Hutchison Holdings said Wednesday its subsidiary started arbitration proceedings against Panama after that country’s Supreme Court ruled a concession for the subsidiary to operate Panama Canal ports was unconstitutional.
Hutchison said it strongly disagreed with last week’s ruling, and China warned Panama would pay “a heavy price” if it persisted. Panama’s president has moved to assure the public that the ports would operate without interruption after the ruling, which advanced a US aim to block any influence by China over the canal linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Hutchison’s subsidiary, Panama Ports Company, began arbitration proceedings Tuesday under the rules of the Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce, the company said in a statement.
The rules are overseen by the chamber’s International Court of Arbitration, an independent body, and it’s unclear what the impact of the proceedings would be. The Panamanian president’s office and commerce ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment late Tuesday local time.
The ruling draws ire from China
The court ruling has drawn backlash from China, and the tensions may complicate Hutchison’s plan to sell its port assets in dozens of countries to a group that includes the US investment firm BlackRock Inc.
The planned sale has already been caught up in tensions between Beijing and Washington. US President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the canal, initially welcomed that plan. However, it apparently angered Beijing and drew a review by Chinese anti-monopoly authorities.
On Tuesday night, Beijing’s office overseeing Hong Kong affairs criticized the Panama court ruling as legally groundless and ridiculous, saying the ruling reflected that Panamanian authorities were bowing down to hegemonic powers. It did not specify the countries but pointed to politicians from some countries who had said they were “encouraged” by the ruling, in an apparent veiled reference to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
In a statement shared on social media platform WeChat, the office said that China will never bow to hegemonism and has sufficient means and tools, as well as capability, to uphold justice in the international economic and trade order.
“Panama’s authorities should recognize the situation and correct their course,” it said. “If they persist in their own way and refuse to see reason, they will pay a heavy price both politically and economically!”
A company caught in US-China tensions
The Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. The awkward position Hutchison found itself in highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing’s expectations of national loyalty, especially during U.S-China tension. CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong’s richest man, Li Ka-shing.
The company said last July that it was considering seeking a Chinese investor to join as a significant member of the consortium under its sale plan, a move that some interpreted as way to please Beijing, but CK Hutchison hasn’t said more since.
The consortium also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, which is chaired by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li’s.
Last May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor.
Panama’s government has maintained it has full control over the canal and that the operation of the ports by Hutchison does not mean Chinese control of it. But Rubio made clear that the US viewed the operation of the ports as a national security issue.
Hutchison said it strongly disagreed with last week’s ruling, and China warned Panama would pay “a heavy price” if it persisted. Panama’s president has moved to assure the public that the ports would operate without interruption after the ruling, which advanced a US aim to block any influence by China over the canal linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Hutchison’s subsidiary, Panama Ports Company, began arbitration proceedings Tuesday under the rules of the Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce, the company said in a statement.
The rules are overseen by the chamber’s International Court of Arbitration, an independent body, and it’s unclear what the impact of the proceedings would be. The Panamanian president’s office and commerce ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment late Tuesday local time.
The ruling draws ire from China
The court ruling has drawn backlash from China, and the tensions may complicate Hutchison’s plan to sell its port assets in dozens of countries to a group that includes the US investment firm BlackRock Inc.
The planned sale has already been caught up in tensions between Beijing and Washington. US President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the canal, initially welcomed that plan. However, it apparently angered Beijing and drew a review by Chinese anti-monopoly authorities.
On Tuesday night, Beijing’s office overseeing Hong Kong affairs criticized the Panama court ruling as legally groundless and ridiculous, saying the ruling reflected that Panamanian authorities were bowing down to hegemonic powers. It did not specify the countries but pointed to politicians from some countries who had said they were “encouraged” by the ruling, in an apparent veiled reference to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
In a statement shared on social media platform WeChat, the office said that China will never bow to hegemonism and has sufficient means and tools, as well as capability, to uphold justice in the international economic and trade order.
“Panama’s authorities should recognize the situation and correct their course,” it said. “If they persist in their own way and refuse to see reason, they will pay a heavy price both politically and economically!”
A company caught in US-China tensions
The Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. The awkward position Hutchison found itself in highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing’s expectations of national loyalty, especially during U.S-China tension. CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong’s richest man, Li Ka-shing.
The company said last July that it was considering seeking a Chinese investor to join as a significant member of the consortium under its sale plan, a move that some interpreted as way to please Beijing, but CK Hutchison hasn’t said more since.
The consortium also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, which is chaired by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li’s.
Last May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor.
Panama’s government has maintained it has full control over the canal and that the operation of the ports by Hutchison does not mean Chinese control of it. But Rubio made clear that the US viewed the operation of the ports as a national security issue.
Latest updates
Recommended
© 2026 SAUDI RESEARCH & PUBLISHING COMPANY, All Rights Reserved And subject to Terms of Use Agreement.