Houthis hijack education in Yemen

Some students from Sanaa University and private universities under Houthi control said that they rejected the new courses. (Reuters)
Updated 03 May 2018
Follow

Houthis hijack education in Yemen

  • When the Houthis took over Sanaa three years ago, they arrested many of their opponents, some of whom were university professors
  • While some Yemenis have rejected the thoughts and beliefs forced on them, few dare to oppose the rebels openly

ADEN: The Houthis are touting their ideology at Yemen’s universities and changing the curriculum to promote their own political and religious agenda, according to professors and students at rebel-controlled institutions.

When the Houthis took over Sanaa three years ago, they arrested many of their opponents, some of whom were university professors who fled overseas or to other provinces. It gave the Houthis a chance to infiltrate public and private universities, appoint new professors and introduce fresh courses into the curriculum.

One mandatory course that all first-year university students must attend is “The Arab-Israeli Conflict.” Instead of teaching a core piece of Middle East history as the title suggests, it promotes Houthi ideology and includes teachings by their founder, Hussein Badr Al-Deen Al-Houthi. 

The course praises Shiites and glorifies Hezbollah and its leader Hassan Nasrallah for fighting against Israel. It lauds their foreign allies in Iran, Lebanon and Syria.

The course describes Saudi Arabia and other Sunni countries as mercenaries, and portrays the role of the Saudi-led coalition in the Yemen war as “an aggression.” The coalition joined the Yemen conflict in support of the internationally recognized government after the Houthis and their allies seized the capital.

While some Yemenis have rejected the thoughts and beliefs forced on them, few dare to oppose the rebels openly. 

“The Houthis impose their beliefs on the university curriculum to reflect the good face of the Shiite to attract new supporters even after so many years, but I think that the students are clever enough to distinguish between right and wrong,” said an anti-Houthi professor from Sanaa University who did not want his name published.

The Iran-backed Houthi militias, which follow the Zaidi branch of Shiite Islam, understand the importance of shaping the minds of the next generation through education, he said, but the professors themselves can do little to stop them.

“We professors cannot oppose them, so we will continue to work under the leadership of the Houthis until the Houthis lose their control on universities,” he told Arab News.

According to the Middle East Institute (MEI), a research institute based in Washington, Iran has expanded its academic and cultural exchange programs inside Yemen, and reportedly used these programs to recruit Yemenis for its political and military training courses, some of which are jointly run with the Lebanese Hezbollah.

“Since the Houthi rebels took over the Yemeni capital of Sanaa three years ago, Iran has stepped up its hard power and soft power efforts to expand its influence in the Arab country,” MEI said in a commentary.

“While Iran’s transfer of weapons and missile technology to Yemen often make international headlines, the Iranian soft power efforts aimed at promoting the Islamic republic’s ideological, revolutionary, cultural and political influence in Yemen are largely overlooked,” it noted.

Yemen’s deputy premier and interior minister, Maj. Gen. Hussein Arab, also said last year that the Houthis were injecting sectarian thought into the curriculum.

Some students from Sanaa University and private universities under Houthi control said that they rejected the new courses.

“The Houthis implemented courses and subjects that praise the Shiites and insult Sunnis either in Yemen or outside Yemen but this is not why we came here to study,” said a first-year accountancy student at Sanaa University, who did not give his name for fear of repercussions.

“They even brought Shiite professors to teach these courses and subjects, which are irrational but no one dares to oppose them because we already know the result of any opposition,” he said.

“The only solution is to pretend that we are very interested in such subjects. Otherwise, we will fail in the examination and no one will help us.”

Others expressed revulsion that their professors were helping the rebels to indoctrinate pupils.

“The disaster is not the Houthis themselves but the professors who teach their doctrines,” said another student. Salah (not his real name) from Sanaa University, said: “I cannot believe that a professor who has spent most of his life learning will finally come to teach us the beliefs of Shiites and sermons of Al-Houthi.”

He said there were some independent professors at Sanaa University but many did not dare to oppose the Houthis and found themselves having to follow the demands of the militias to protect their families and themselves.

“If the independent professors oppose the Houthis, the Houthis definitely will harm them and they may detain them,” he said.

Last year, the militias fired more than 40 professors from Sanaa University under the pretext of absence and appointed professors who were favorable toward the Houthis to replace them.

The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) warned in March that Yemen’s education system has become another casualty in the conflict, with nearly two million Yemeni children now out of school.

“An entire generation of children in Yemen faces a bleak future because of limited or no access to education. Even those who remain in school are not getting the quality education they need,” said its Yemen representative Meritxell Relano.

More than 2,500 schools are now out of use — with two thirds damaged by attacks, 27 percent shut down and 7 percent used for military purposes or as shelters for the displaced, the aid agency reported.

UNICEF had previously warned that children and youth prevented from going to school due to war were especially vulnerable to foreign exploitation and indoctrination. 


Family of Palestinian-American shot dead by Israeli settler demand accountability

Updated 21 February 2026
Follow

Family of Palestinian-American shot dead by Israeli settler demand accountability

  • Relatives say Abu Siyam was among about 30 residents from the village of Mukhmas who confronted armed settlers attempting to steal goats from the community

LONDON: The family of a 19-year-old Palestinian-American man reportedly shot dead by an Israeli settler in the occupied West Bank have demanded accountability, amid mounting scrutiny over a surge in settler violence and a lack of prosecutions.

Nasrallah Abu Siyam, a US citizen born in Philadelphia, was killed near the city of Ramallah on Wednesday, becoming at least the sixth American citizen to die in incidents involving Israeli settlers or soldiers in the territory in the past two years.

Relatives say Abu Siyam was among about 30 residents from the village of Mukhmas who confronted armed settlers attempting to steal goats from the community. Witnesses said that stones were thrown by both sides before settlers opened fire, wounding at least three villagers.

Abu Siyam was struck and later died of his injuries.

Abdulhamid Siyam, the victim’s cousin, said the killing reflected a wider pattern of impunity.

“A young man of 19 shot and killed in cold blood, and no responsibility,” he told the BBC. “Impunity completely.”

The US State Department said that it was aware of the death of a US citizen and was “carefully monitoring the situation,” while the Trump administration said that it stood ready to provide consular assistance.

The Israeli embassy in Washington said the incident was under review and that an operational inquiry “must be completed as soon as possible.”

A spokesperson for the Israeli Defense Forces said troops were deployed to the scene and used “riot dispersal means to restore order,” adding that no IDF gunfire was reported.

The military confirmed that the incident remained under review and said that a continued presence would be maintained in the area to prevent further unrest.

Palestinians and human rights organizations say such reviews rarely lead to criminal accountability, arguing that Israeli authorities routinely fail to prosecute settlers accused of violence.

A US embassy spokesperson later said that Washington “condemns this violence,” as international concern continues to grow over conditions in the occupied West Bank.

Palestinians and human rights groups say Israeli authorities routinely fail to investigate or prosecute settlers accused of violence against civilians.

Those concerns were echoed this week by the UN, which warned that Israel’s actions in the occupied West Bank may amount to ethnic cleansing.

A UN human rights office report on Thursday said that Israeli settlement expansion, settler attacks and military operations have increasingly displaced Palestinian communities, with dozens of villages reportedly emptied since the start of the Gaza war.

The report also criticized Israeli military tactics in the northern West Bank, saying that they resembled warfare and led to mass displacement, while noting abuses by Palestinian security forces, including the use of unnecessary lethal force and the intimidation of critics.

Neither Israel’s foreign ministry nor the Palestinian Authority has commented on the findings.