US postpones imposition of travel restrictions on Pakistani diplomats 

Widespread reports suggest that the US has deferred the action till mid-May to assess how bilateral issues pan out. (AFP photo)
Updated 01 May 2018
Follow

US postpones imposition of travel restrictions on Pakistani diplomats 

  • Travel restrictions deferred till mid-May as countries seek to iron out differences
  • Neither Pakistan's Foreign Office or the US State Department has issued a statement on the decision

ISLAMABAD: Washington has delayed imposing travel restrictions — expected to take effect from May 1 — on Pakistan envoys at its embassy and consulates in the US. 

Neither Pakistan's Foreign Office or the US State Department has issued a statement on the decision, however the delay signals that both sides are making efforts to settle their differences. 

Widespread reports suggest that the US has deferred the action till mid-May to assess how bilateral issues pan out. 

Pakistan conveyed its reservations to Alice G. Wells, visiting principal US deputy assistant secretary for South and Central Asia, last week. It said the “reciprocal” travel restrictions would be damaging to Pakistan’s image. 

“Both governments have to review this very carefully because this negatively impacts long-standing relations,” former diplomat Javed Hafiz told Arab News. 

He said that Pakistan and the US had mostly enjoyed good relations, but there was a downward trajectory from 2011 after the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, and the situation further deteriorated after the unveiling of Trump’s South Asia policy last August.   

“The basic duty and function of a diplomat is to promote relations in any area of cooperation,” Hafiz said.

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs had confirmed that US authorities had communicated projected travel restrictions on Pakistani diplomats in the US effective from May 1, 2018.

“We have received official communication regarding certain measures that the US intends to implement with effect from 1st of May 2018,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Dr. Mohammed Faisal said during a weekly news briefing in April.

The Foreign Office response came after Tuesday’s remarks by US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Thomas Shannon that Washington’s decision was “reciprocal” but played down the move as “common in diplomacy.”

US officials have long voiced their frustration about Islamabad’s travel restrictions on serving diplomats at the US Embassy and consulates, a State Department source told Arab News. 

The restrictions stem from a growing trust deficit and a number of past incidents including the US Navy SEAL raid in 2011 that killed Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad without Pakistan’s knowledge.


First charges in Philippine flood control scandal target ex-lawmaker, officials

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

First charges in Philippine flood control scandal target ex-lawmaker, officials

  • Rage over so-called ghost infrastructure, believed to have cost taxpayers billions of dollars, has been building for months
  • Construction firm owners, government officials and lawmakers have been accused of pocketing funds for substandard projects
MANILA: Philippine prosecutors filed on Tuesday the first criminal charges in a sweeping corruption scandal over bogus flood control projects, promising “many” more indictments in the case that has prompted public ire and protests.
Rage over so-called ghost infrastructure, believed to have cost taxpayers billions of dollars, has been building for months, ever since President Ferdinand Marcos put the issue center stage in a July address after weeks of deadly flooding.
Scores of construction firm owners, government officials and lawmakers in the archipelago country have been accused of pocketing funds for substandard projects.
On Tuesday, the ombudsman’s office unveiled charges against former congressman Elizaldy Co, public works officials and members of a construction firm over their ties to a “grossly” substandard road dike in Oriental Mindoro province.
The charges include falsification of documents, misuse of public funds and graft law violations.
“Public funds were meant to protect communities from flooding, not to enrich officials or private contractors,” ombudsman spokesman Mico Clavano told a press briefing.
He said the department was acting on the first case submitted by an independent commission, with more in the preliminary investigation stage.
“This is the first of many cases that will be filed in court,” he said.
The announcement comes a day after Iglesia ni Cristo (INC), a church which has historically been a powerful voting bloc with ties to the Duterte political dynasty, concluded back-to-back rallies in Manila that drew hundreds of thousands of people.
The rallies saw INC leaders allude to “emerging evidence” in the case, and featured videos that Co. – who has gone into hiding – released from abroad, accusing Marcos of masterminding the corruption.
While it was Marcos who pledged to identify the guilty and name names in his July speech, the ensuing furor has enveloped friend and foe alike.
On Monday, the Marcos administration saw two cabinet members, executive secretary Lucas Bersamin and budget director Amenah Pangandaman, step down after being linked to flood-control fraud.
The president’s congressman cousin, Martin Romualdez, resigned as House speaker in September after being implicated.
At Monday’s INC rally, Senator Imee Marcos, the president’s sister and a key ally of his arch-foe Vice President Sara Duterte, took to the stage to accuse him of drug use, saying it had impaired his judgment.
“His addiction became the reason for the flood of corruption, the lack of direction and very wrong decisions,” she said.
President Marcos’s son Sandro fired back on Tuesday, slamming the accusations as “not only false, but dangerously irresponsible.”