Pope Francis and Latin American winds of change

A man walks past a store of Argentine San Lorenzo de Almagro sports club decorated with a graffiti depicting Pope Francis in Buenos Aires on Jan. 03, 2017. Pope Francis returns to Latin America for the sixth time in his pontificate on January 15, 2018 avoiding again his native Argentina, a significant gesture that brings up many questions. (AFP/Eitan Abramovich)
Updated 14 January 2018
Follow

Pope Francis and Latin American winds of change

Vatican City: A squall of fresh air with a distinct Latin American feel tore through the Vatican on the election of Pope Francis, a passionate Argentine whose defense of the downtrodden has stirred hearts across the world.
On his return to the continent this week with a trip to Catholic majority Chile and Peru, Francis will not only speak his native Spanish but also a vibrant spiritual and cultural language common to all.
“I feel free, nothing scares me,” the pontiff once said, despite shouldering the burden of leading the world’s 1.3 billion Catholics, nearly half of whom live in the Americas.
It was a typically American expression according to fellow Argentine, Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, who has known Francis for decades.
“North and South America are both societies with European origins that have realized they need independence. The idea of freedom is the cornerstone of the Americas,” the philosophy professor told AFP.
The first pope to address the United States congress has “a strong sense of human dignity and freedom,” he says.
But while one of the Americas has prospered, the other has become increasingly impoverished.
“The pope is very sensitive to the issue of social justice — a more Latin than North American theme, hence the interest he has for the ‘peripheries’ in difficulty,” Sorondo said, referring to Francis’s support for those on the margins.

The Archbishop of Buenos Aires was virtually an unknown when he was elected on March 13, 2013, becoming the first pope to choose the name Francis — a homage to St. Francis of Assisi, who dedicated his life to the poor.
The Argentine hails from a family of Italian immigrants and became “a sort of link between the Old World and the New World,” says Giovanni Maria Vian, editor of the Vatican’s L’Osservatore Romano newspaper.
However, “the dramatic history of Argentina at the end of the 20th century is what shapes his personal trajectory,” he says in the preface to a book called “Francis, the American pope.”
In 2007, Jorge Bergoglio was elected by his fellow bishops in Aparecida in Brazil to draw up the final document of the Latin American Episcopal Council, which can be read as a guide to many of the themes dearest to him.
Bergoglio stressed the ills of a “scandalous inequality which wounds personal dignity,” a theme which “clearly guides his actions at the head of the church today,” Vatican specialist Nicolas Seneze writes in “The Words of the Pope.”
The Aparecida conference “prioritized the poor,” Sarondo said.
“The pope is very critical of capitalism which sacrifices human rights — a typical stance of the Latin American episcopate,” he added.

While Polish pope John Paul II had denounced “wild capitalism,” Francis has taken more concrete steps, such as calling for “a poor church for the poor” and turning down a luxurious papal apartment for a humble hotel room, he said.
Bergoglio was an active pastor, taking the bus around Buenos Aires and heading without a second thought into slums in Latin America to comfort the poor.
His experience of the Argentine economic crisis has also shaped his idea of “the misery of big cities,” which fatally attract poor farmers from the countryside in search of a better life, stripping them of their culture.
His vision was strongly influenced by the “theology of the people,” the Argentine, non-violent version of the South American Liberation theology — a strain without the focus on the Marxist class struggle.
And since his arrival in Rome, the pope has created new Latin American cardinals, saying “they bring with them the air of new churches and of a history of faith and of blood.”
In doing so, he is also reshaping in his image the conclave of cardinals that will elect his successor.


US ‘totally stupid’ to attack Iran during talks: UN ambassador

Updated 03 March 2026
Follow

US ‘totally stupid’ to attack Iran during talks: UN ambassador

  • “War was not our option. War was imposed on Iran,” Bahreini told UN correspondents
  • “Nobody should expect Iran to show restraint in front of aggression”

GENEVA: The United States made a “totally stupid decision” to attack Iran while in negotiations, and betrayed Gulf nations by trashing their diplomatic efforts, Tehran’s UN ambassador said Tuesday.
Ali Bahreini, Iran’s ambassador in Geneva, insisted Tehran had no problem with its neighbors, but could not let US bases in the Gulf be used as launchpads for attacks on Iran.
“War was not our option. War was imposed on Iran,” Bahreini told UN correspondents.
“Nobody should expect Iran to show restraint in front of aggression.
“We will continue our defense until the point that this aggression is stopped,” he said.
On February 26, Washington and Tehran held indirect negotiations in Geneva on Iran’s nuclear program — with the Omani mediators reporting “significant progress.”
Bahreini was present for part of those talks and said “everybody was optimistic” and the US team “agreed to continue negotiations” in Vienna this week.
But Bahreini said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had convinced US President Donald Trump to destroy diplomacy and attack Iran, with strikes starting on Saturday.
“It was a totally stupid decision. They will know in the future how stupid this decision has been. Both of them will understand, because Iran will firmly determine the situation and the destiny of this war,” he said.
“All our neighbors are now disappointed with the betrayal of the United States because everybody was working for diplomacy, particularly Oman.
“The US betrayed everybody.”

- ‘Not a regional war’ -

Tehran has launched strikes against countries in the region that host US bases.
“I cannot accept labelling what we are doing as reprisal. What we are doing is a kind of self-defense,” said Bahreini.
The ambassador said Iran’s problem was not with its neighbors, describing the Gulf countries as friends.
“We are in daily dialogue with our neighbors to convey to them the message that this war is not a war against our neighbors.
“This is not a regional war.
“But we cannot ignore the fact that the US bases in their lands are operational against us.
“In no way we can allow those bases to be used to make military operations against Iran.”
He said Iran’s operations were “exclusively” against US military targets, and said “there has been very serious order given to our military forces not to make any harm to civilians.”
Trump claimed Tuesday that the Iranian leadership “want to talk” but Bahreini insisted no approach had been made to Washington, saying “there hasn’t been any contact from our side” since the war erupted.