10,000 killed in 1989 Tiananmen crackdown: British cable

This file photo of June 4, 1989 shows Beijing residents gathering around the smoking remains of over 20 armored personnel carriers burned by demonstrators during clashes with soldiers near Tiananmen Square. (AFP)
Updated 23 December 2017
Follow

10,000 killed in 1989 Tiananmen crackdown: British cable

BEIJING: At least 10,000 people were killed in the Chinese Army’s crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in June 1989, according to a newly released British diplomatic cable that recounts the bloodshed in gruesome detail.
The document, made public more than 28 years after the event, describes injured girls being bayoneted, bodies being ground up by armored vehicles (APCs) and human remains being flushed into the sewers.
“Minimum estimate of civilian dead 10,000,” the then British Ambassador Alan Donald said in the secret telegram to London seen by AFP at Britain’s National Archives.
The estimate, given on June 5, 1989, the day after the crackdown, is almost 10 times higher than that commonly accepted at the time of several hundred to more than a thousand dead.
But experts questioned by AFP said the 10,000 figure seemed credible.
Donald’s account gives horrific details of the violence unleashed on the night of June 3-4, when the army entered Beijing to end seven weeks of protests on Tiananmen Square, the symbolic heart of Communist power.
During their advance, armored personnel carriers “opened fire on the crowd (both civilians and soldiers) before running over them in their APCs,” wrote the ambassador.
He said his source was a person who “was passing on information given him by a close friend who is currently a member of the State Council” — the Chinese Cabinet.
He said the source had previously proved reliable “and was careful to separate fact from speculation and rumor.”
Once the soldiers arrived in Tiananmen Square, “students understood they were given one hour to leave square but after five minutes APCs attacked,” Donald wrote.
“Students linked arms but were mown down including soldiers. APCs then ran over bodies time and time again to make ‘pie’ and remains collected by bulldozer. Remains incinerated and then hosed down drains.”
“Four wounded girl students begged for their lives but were bayoneted,” Donald said, adding: “Army ambulances who attempted to give aid were shot up.”
At the end of June 1989, the Chinese government had said suppression of the “counter-revolutionary riots” had killed 200 civilians and several dozen police and military.
Nearly three decades after the crackdown, the communist regime continues to forbid any debate on the subject, mention of which is banned from textbooks and the media, and censored on the Internet.
There was no sign of reaction to the report on Chinese social media, where an army of online censors blocks any reference to the Tiananmen crackdown and most things critical of the Communist Party.
Donald said the atrocities were committed by the 27th Army, who he described as “60 percent illiterate and are called primitives.”
He said the crackdown had created deep rifts within the military and that “some members of the State Council considered that civil war is imminent.”
As to the credibility of the toll, former student protest leader Xiong Yan, who is now an American citizen, said: “I think it’s reliable.”
China scholar Jean-Pierre Cabestan also said the figure was credible, pointing out that recently declassified US documents gave a similar assessment.
“That’s two pretty independent sources which say the same thing,” said Cabestan, a professor at Hong Kong Baptist University.
The British ambassador’s report was “not particularly astonishing considering how crowded it was in Beijing, the number of people mobilized” against the Chinese government, said Cabestan, who was in the Chinese capital in the days leading up to the crackdown.
Former student leader Feng Congde, now also based in the US, pointed out that Donald had sent another telegram three weeks later putting the death toll at between 2,700 and 3,400.
Feng said that toll was quite credible and fitted with figures from the Chinese Red Cross, who at the time estimated 2,700 fatalities, and by student committees based on hospital reports.


US allows oil majors to broadly operate in Venezuela, new energy investments

Updated 53 min 59 sec ago
Follow

US allows oil majors to broadly operate in Venezuela, new energy investments

  • Treasury Department issues general license allowing Chevron, BP, Eni, Shell and Repsol to operate oil and gas operations in Venezuela
  • Move is the most significant relaxation of sanctions on Venezuela since US forces captured and removed President Nicolas Maduro

WASHINGTON: The US ​eased sanctions on Venezuela’s energy sector on Friday, issuing two general licenses that allow global energy companies to operate oil and gas projects in the OPEC member and for other companies to negotiate contracts to bring in fresh investments. The move was the most significant relaxation of sanctions on Venezuela since US forces captured and removed President Nicolas Maduro last month.
The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued a general license allowing Chevron, BP, Eni, Shell and Repsol to operate oil and gas operations in Venezuela. Those companies still have offices in the country and stakes in projects, and are among the main partners of state-run ‌company PDVSA.
The authorization ‌for the oil majors’ operations requires payments for royalties and Venezuelan ​taxes ‌to ⁠go through ​the US-controlled ⁠Foreign Government Deposit Fund.
The other license allows companies around the world to enter contracts with PDVSA for new investments in Venezuelan oil and gas. The contracts are contingent on separate permits from OFAC.
The authorization does not allow transactions with companies in Russia, Iran, or China or entities owned or controlled by joint ventures with people in those countries.
The licenses “invite American and other aligned companies to play a constructive role in supporting economic recovery and responsible investment, ” the US State Department said in a release. Additional authorizations may be issued “as necessary,” it said.
A spokesperson for Chevron, ⁠the only US oil firm currently operating in Venezuela, said the company welcomed ‌the new licenses.
“The new General Licenses, coupled with recent changes ‌in Venezuela’s Hydrocarbons Law, are important steps toward enabling the further development ​of Venezuela’s resources for its people and for advancing ‌regional energy security,” the spokesperson said in a statement.
Eni said it is assessing the opportunities in ‌Venezuela that the authorization opens up.

Oil law reform

The US licenses follow a sweeping reform of Venezuela’s main oil law approved last month, which grants autonomy for foreign oil and gas producers to operate, export and cash sale proceeds under existing joint ventures with PDVSA or through a new production-sharing contract model.
The US has had sanctions on Venezuela since ‌2019 when President Donald Trump imposed them during his first administration. Trump is now seeking $100 billion in investments by energy companies in Venezuela’s oil and gas sector. ⁠US Energy Secretary Chris Wright ⁠said on Thursday, during his second day of a trip to Venezuela, that oil sales from the country since Maduro’s capture have hit $1 billion and would hit another $5 billion in months.
Wright said the US will control the proceeds from the sales until Venezuela stands up a “representative government.” Since last month, the Treasury issued several other general licenses to facilitate oil exports, storage, imports and sales from Venezuela. It also authorized the provision of US goods, technology, software or services for the exploration, development or production of oil and gas in Venezuela.
The Venezuelan government expropriated assets of Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips in 2007 under then-President Hugo Chavez. The Trump administration is trying to get those companies to invest in Venezuela as well. At a meeting at the White House with Trump last month, Exxon Mobil CEO Darren Woods said Venezuela was “uninvestable” at ​the moment.
Wright said on Thursday that Exxon, ​which no longer has an office in Venezuela, is in talks with the government there and gathering data about the oil sector. Exxon did not immediately comment.