India seeks to reshape Middle East policy 

The Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi. (Reuters)
Updated 09 December 2017
Follow

India seeks to reshape Middle East policy 

LONDON: India is often viewed as peaceful and disinterested spectator of security issues in the Arab world – but that may be about to change according to analysts.

India has started to consider taking more strategic positions in light of the rapidly changing diplomatic, security and military landscape in the Middle East, Asharq Al-Awsat reported.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has sought to bring the country closer to West Asia as a key plank of its foreign policy. 

He has visited Saudi Arabia, Iran and Israel in recent years. The country has also signed security and defense agreements with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Oman and Qatar. 

In Syria it has provided what is perceived as a kind of silent support for President Bashar Assad, and has occupied the middle ground between the West and Russia on this issue.

Kabir Taneja, an associate fellow at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, said: “India’s modern ambitions are challenging the notion of how it approaches the region. 

“It is becoming harder for India to portray itself as a neutral power in the region for navigating the complex rivalries of the Middle East, particularly when India is keen to claim greater influence for itself in the world.”

Former diplomat G. Parthasarthy agrees that the country has been adept at maintaining ties with most of the region’s powers – some of them belligerents – even if that fine balancing act may become increasingly difficult to maintain.

“Modi has skillfully ensured that India is perhaps the only country in the world, which has growing, good relations with all major regional powers— Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Israel and Egypt yet maintaining this geopolitical balance in the Gulf will continue to prove challenging for India in the present scenario. “

Hindustan Times Foreign Editor Pramit Pal Chaudhuri said that developing India’s foreign policy in the region may not be straightforward.

“India has been cautious about expanding its military presence in the Gulf and Arabian Sea area. The region’s various governments are sharply divided in their support for the various local protagonists in the civil wars of Syria, Iraq and Yemen. 

“Any Indian military activity, regardless of how low-key, would be interpreted as favoring one country or another, something New Delhi remains sensitive about.”


Germany plays down threat of US invading Greenland after talks

Updated 13 January 2026
Follow

Germany plays down threat of US invading Greenland after talks

WASHINGTON: Germany’s top diplomat on Monday played down the risk of a US attack on Greenland, after President Donald Trump’s repeated threats to seize the island from NATO ally Denmark.
Asked after meeting Secretary of State Marco Rubio about a unilateral military move by Trump, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said: “I have no indication that this is being seriously considered.”
“Rather, I believe there is a common interest in addressing the security issues that arise in the Arctic region, and that we should and will do so,” he told reporters.
“NATO is only now in the process of developing more concrete plans on this, and these will then be discussed jointly with our US partners.”
Wadephul’s visit comes ahead of talks this week in Washington between Rubio and the top diplomats of Denmark and Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark.
Trump in recent days has vowed that the United States will take Greenland “one way or the other” and said he can do it “the nice way or the more difficult way.”
Greenland’s government on Monday repeated that it would not accept a US takeover under “any circumstance.”
Greenland and NATO also said Monday that they were working on bolstering defense of the Arctic territory, a key concern cited by Trump.
Trump has repeatedly pointed to growing Arctic activity by Russia and China as a reason why the United States needs to take over Greenland.
But he has also spoken more broadly of his desire to expand the land mass controlled by the United States.