LONDON: As the UK marks the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, an Arab News survey of students in London showed widespread support for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.
Marna Judson, a student at the New College of the Humanities, said the 1917 declaration was “careless.”
“We didn’t stop to think who might suffer because of (the Balfour Declaration),” she said. “It was a gesture that had such huge repercussions that weren’t properly evaluated at the time. The Palestinian people are not getting the voice they deserve,” she said.
Leslie, a computer science PhD student at University College London (UCL), who declined to give his full name, said his sympathies came down on the side of the Palestinians. “They have suffered a great deal and they are at rock-bottom,” he said.
“When (the British) wanted to relinquish control of what was known then as the Mandate for Palestine, they should have technically involved all parties in the discussion, which they did not do.”
Others said there had been wrongdoing on both sides of the conflict. “Both are doing things wrong to one another. They’re both killing, and I don’t think either side should be excused,” said Ahmed, a physics student at UCL.
At the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), where a tangled Palestinian flag adorns a tree in the main thoroughfare, students were strongly pro-Palestinian. “Putting (Palestinians) in jail when your soldiers are killing people with submachine guns is ridiculous,” said Phoebe Craig.
She dismissed criticism that anti-Semitism was a problem at SOAS, saying: “We have no problem with Israel. It’s Israel’s policy toward Palestine.”
Many students expressed sympathy with the Palestinian people. “There should be a Palestinian state. At least that way they could be treated as equals on the international stage,” said Anwar, an MA student at the London School of Economic (LSE).
There was little agreement about what the UK should do to bring about a solution. Some called for the UK to impose economic sanctions against Israel as a way of bringing about Palestinian nationhood.
Liam Anderson, a Birkbeck student, said: “Part of you thinks, well, of course (the UK) needs to intervene and sort these things out, but then again intervention is the thing that caused the situation in the first place. But at the same time you can’t leave a nation like Palestine to sort itself out because it’s so poor. How is it going to do that in the face of Israel?”
The view from campus 100 years after Balfour
The view from campus 100 years after Balfour
Trump claims Iran working on missiles that could hit US
- Trump says his preference is diplomacy, but would never allow Tehran to have a nuclear weapon
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Tuesday claimed Iran is seeking to develop missiles that can strike the United States and accused Tehran of working to rebuild a nuclear program that was targeted by American strikes last year.
The United States and Iran are engaged in high-stakes negotiations over Iran’s atomic program and other issues including missiles, with Trump saying he prefers diplomacy but is willing to use force if talks fail.
“They’ve already developed missiles that can threaten Europe and our bases overseas, and they’re working to build missiles that will soon reach the United States of America,” Trump said during his State of the Union address.
In 2025, the US Defense Intelligence Agency said Iran could potentially develop a militarily viable intercontinental ballistic missile by 2035 “should Tehran decide to pursue the capability,” but did not say if it had made such a decision.
Tehran currently possesses short- and medium-range ballistic missiles with ranges that top out at about 1,850 miles (3,000 kilometers), according to the US Congressional Research Service.
The continental United States is more than 6,000 miles from Iran’s western tip.
Washington and Tehran have concluded two rounds of talks aimed at reaching a deal on Iran’s nuclear program to replace the agreement that Trump tore up during his first term in office.
‘Preference’ is diplomacy
The United States has repeatedly called for zero uranium enrichment by Iran but has also sought to address its ballistic missile program and support for armed groups in the region — demands Iran has rejected.
Iran has also repeatedly rejected that it is pursuing nuclear weapons.
Trump ordered strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites last year, claiming afterward that Tehran’s atomic program was obliterated.
On Tuesday, he said Iran wants “to start all over again,” and that it is “at this moment again pursuing their sinister nuclear ambitions.”
Trump has sent a massive US military force to the Middle East, deploying two aircraft carriers as well as more than a dozen other ships, a large number of warplanes and other assets to the region.
He has repeatedly threatened to strike Iran if negotiations fail to reach a new agreement. Talks with Tehran are currently set to continue on Thursday.
“My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy but one thing is certain: I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror, which they are by far, to have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said.
The US president’s speech primarily focused on domestic issues, making no mention at all of China — Washington’s primary military and economic rival — and only briefly referring to Russia.
Trump said he was working to end the bloody conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and repeated his inaccurate claim that he had brought eight other wars to an end since returning to office in January 2025.
He also hailed NATO’s decision to spend five percent of gross domestic product on defense — a move made under heavy pressure from Trump and his administration.
