BARCELONA: Catalonia’s secessionist politicians have admitted that the region’s independence declaration failed and recriminations have started to fly.
Five days after the Catalan parliament proclaimed a break away from Spain, the new republic’s civil servants were working directly for the central government which imposed direct rule without finding any resistance, as had initially been feared.
Catalonia’s deposed, separatist leader Carles Puigdemont had traveled to Brussels where he told independence supporters to prepare for “a long stretch” and said it would be better to “slow down” the independence process rather than risk unrest.
He also accepted the “challenge” of Catalan elections on December 21 as called by Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy to “restore normality” after he imposed temporary direct rule on the semi-autonomous region in a bid to stop secession.
“The independence movement hasn’t slowed down, it’s stopped,” retorted a Spanish government source in Barcelona, who refused to be named.
Santi Vila, who was Puigdemont’s regional business minister until last week when he resigned after the Catalan leader decided against calling snap elections — an option some felt could have eased the crisis — accused his former colleagues Tuesday of naivety.
He said Catalonia hadn’t been ready to function as an independent republic.
“Where’s the control over the territory, the control of ports, airports, the management of transport?” he asked.
“We lacked the necessary political intelligence,” he admitted on Catalonia’s Rac1 radio, but denied having misled independence supporters.
“But it’s true that I have government colleagues who displayed a level of naivety that is surprising at their age.”
Vila put his name forward to lead his Catalan European Democratic Party (PDeCAT) — also Puigdemont’s party — into the elections.
PDeCAT is part of the separatist coalition that ruled Catalonia until the regional government was axed by Madrid on Friday, along with leftist nationalist ERC, whose leader Oriol Junqueras was vice president and the region’s economic czar.
After having encouraged Puigdemont to take the final step toward a unilateral declaration of independence, ERC said it would take part in the regional election.
“We’re champions of democracy, no democrat can compete with us,” Junqueras told Catalonia’s TV3 television Monday.
For its part, the small far-left CUP party, an ally of Puigdemont, asked for time Tuesday to “reflect on what happened, because we’ve seen the limits of institutional mechanisms.”
The independence movement sought EU support after scenes of brutal police repression during an outlawed independence referendum on October 1 and the detention of two high-profile separatist civil leaders suspected of sedition — in vain.
PDeCAT spokeswoman Marta Pascal summed up her impression of the current situation as “crikey, what happened here?,” pointing to the fact there had been no international recognition or that Catalonia’s regional police force were now following Madrid’s orders.
Over the past years, as it built up its independence drive, the Catalan government had sought the help of advisers to craft a new republic and make it a reality.
One such advisory grouping was the National Transition Advisory Council, which put together a “white paper” on independence.
In that paper, it had specifically warned that the success of a unilateral proclamation would depend on whether the new republic could effectively be governed.
Sandra Leon, a political analyst who teaches at England’s York University, said that far from focusing on a new republic, Catalan separatists were now looking ahead to the elections.
“Everyone is going to try and elaborate a tale of what happened in a way that will be most beneficial to them,” she said.
“There was a declaration of independence in which many people had placed their expectations and all of a sudden, days after it happened, there is no clear script.”
Former Catalan president Jose Montilla, a Socialist and rival of the nationalists, on Tuesday accused them of having lied.
They “have deceived people, they have messed with them, they sold them something they knew was a lie, wasn’t possible,” he told Catalan television.
“Why don’t they face the consequences? Where are the representatives of the Catalan republic now?,” he asked.
Rifts, recriminations among Catalonia’s separatists
Rifts, recriminations among Catalonia’s separatists
South Korea court sentences former first lady to jail term for bribery
- Prosecutors had sought a 15-year jail term for the wife of ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol
- Kim Keon Hee has been detained since August and denied all charges
SEOUL: A South Korean court sentenced former first lady Kim Keon Hee on Wednesday to one year and eight months in jail after finding her guilty of accepting Chanel bags and a diamond pendant from Unification Church officials in return for political favors.
The court cleared Kim, the wife of ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol who was ousted from office last year, on charges of stock price manipulation and violating the political funds act.
Prosecutors will appeal against the two not-guilty verdicts, media reports said.
The ruling, which can also be appealed by the former first lady, comes amid a series of trials following investigations into Yoon’s brief imposition of martial law in 2024 and related scandals involving the once-powerful couple.
The position of first lady does not come with any formal power allowing involvement in state affairs, but she is a symbolic figure representing the country, the lead judge of a three-justice bench said.
“A person who was in such a position might not always be a role model, but the person must not be a bad example to the public,” he said in the ruling.
The court ordered her to pay a 12.8 million won ($8,990) fine and ordered the confiscation of the diamond necklace. Kim has been held in detention since August while she was being investigated by a team led by a special prosecutor.
Prosecutors had demanded 15 years in jail and fines of 2.9 billion won over all the accusations she faced.
The court cleared Kim on charges of manipulating stock prices and violating political funding laws.
Kim had denied all the charges. Her lawyer said the team would review the ruling and decide whether to appeal the bribery conviction.
Kim, clad in a dark suit and wearing a face mask, was escorted by guards into the courtroom at the Seoul Central District Court and sat quietly while the verdict was delivered.
Supporters of Yoon and Kim, who braved freezing temperatures outside the court compound, cheered after the not-guilty verdicts on two of the charges were delivered.
The Unification Church said the gifts were delivered to her without expecting anything. Its leader Han Hak-ja, who is also on trial, has denied that she directed it to bribe Kim.
Shaman, political broker
Kim had drawn intense public scrutiny even before her husband was elected president in 2022 over questions about her academic records and lingering suspicion that she had been long involved in manipulating stock prices.
Her alleged association with a political broker and a person known as a shaman also drew public criticism that the two may be unduly influencing the former first couple.
Yoon, who was ousted from power last April, also faces eight trials on charges including insurrection, after his failed bid to impose martial law in December 2024.
He has appealed against a five-year jail term handed to him this month for obstructing attempts to arrest him after his martial law decree.
At a separate trial this month, prosecutors have sought the death penalty for Yoon on the charge of masterminding an insurrection. The court will rule on the case on February 19.
Yoon has argued it was within his powers as president to declare martial law and that the action was aimed at sounding the alarm over the obstruction of government by opposition parties.
The court cleared Kim, the wife of ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol who was ousted from office last year, on charges of stock price manipulation and violating the political funds act.
Prosecutors will appeal against the two not-guilty verdicts, media reports said.
The ruling, which can also be appealed by the former first lady, comes amid a series of trials following investigations into Yoon’s brief imposition of martial law in 2024 and related scandals involving the once-powerful couple.
The position of first lady does not come with any formal power allowing involvement in state affairs, but she is a symbolic figure representing the country, the lead judge of a three-justice bench said.
“A person who was in such a position might not always be a role model, but the person must not be a bad example to the public,” he said in the ruling.
The court ordered her to pay a 12.8 million won ($8,990) fine and ordered the confiscation of the diamond necklace. Kim has been held in detention since August while she was being investigated by a team led by a special prosecutor.
Prosecutors had demanded 15 years in jail and fines of 2.9 billion won over all the accusations she faced.
The court cleared Kim on charges of manipulating stock prices and violating political funding laws.
Kim had denied all the charges. Her lawyer said the team would review the ruling and decide whether to appeal the bribery conviction.
Kim, clad in a dark suit and wearing a face mask, was escorted by guards into the courtroom at the Seoul Central District Court and sat quietly while the verdict was delivered.
Supporters of Yoon and Kim, who braved freezing temperatures outside the court compound, cheered after the not-guilty verdicts on two of the charges were delivered.
The Unification Church said the gifts were delivered to her without expecting anything. Its leader Han Hak-ja, who is also on trial, has denied that she directed it to bribe Kim.
Shaman, political broker
Kim had drawn intense public scrutiny even before her husband was elected president in 2022 over questions about her academic records and lingering suspicion that she had been long involved in manipulating stock prices.
Her alleged association with a political broker and a person known as a shaman also drew public criticism that the two may be unduly influencing the former first couple.
Yoon, who was ousted from power last April, also faces eight trials on charges including insurrection, after his failed bid to impose martial law in December 2024.
He has appealed against a five-year jail term handed to him this month for obstructing attempts to arrest him after his martial law decree.
At a separate trial this month, prosecutors have sought the death penalty for Yoon on the charge of masterminding an insurrection. The court will rule on the case on February 19.
Yoon has argued it was within his powers as president to declare martial law and that the action was aimed at sounding the alarm over the obstruction of government by opposition parties.
© 2026 SAUDI RESEARCH & PUBLISHING COMPANY, All Rights Reserved And subject to Terms of Use Agreement.









