VIDEO: Elephant tramples man to death as he tries to take selfie

Asok Bharti (L) tries to outrun a charging elephant (R) moments before tripping and being trampled on (YouTube)
Updated 05 September 2017
Follow

VIDEO: Elephant tramples man to death as he tries to take selfie

DUBAI: This is the moment a frightened wild elephant killed a man on Saturday by stamping on him after he tried to take a selfie with the creature.

The man, identified by MailOnline as 50-year-old Asok Bharti, apparently approached the elephant in Kuanrmunda, Odisha state, eastern India when it became separated from its herd.

Park rangers were trying to guide the animal back when Bharti approached, but as he tried to take the photo the elephant charged at him and the man tried to run.

But Bharti tripped and fell to the ground and the elephant trampled on him, inflicting horrific injuries, he died on the way to hospital,

On the video, which was shot apparently from a safe distance, people can be heard shouting as the man tries to run for his life and then falling to the ground.

“Forest officials were trying to chase the elephant back to the herd when Bharti came too close to the animal to take a selfie…The animal was nervous as it had strayed away from his family and when the man came too close to it, the elephant in its rescue attacked him,” Philip Sahu, assistant conservator of forests, said.


Dutch couple’s marriage annulled due to ChatGPT speech

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Dutch couple’s marriage annulled due to ChatGPT speech

  • The pair said “I do” and the officiant declared them “not only husband and wife, but above all a team”
  • The judge ⁠found that they had not actually sworn to fulfil their marriage duties

AMSTERDAM: A Dutch couple had their marriage annulled after the person officiating used a ChatGPT-generated speech that was intended to be playful but failed to meet legal requirements, according to a court ruling published this week.
The pair from the city of Zwolle, whose names were redacted from the January 5 decision under Dutch ⁠privacy rules, argued that they had intended to marry regardless of whether the right wording was used when they took their vows.
According to the decision, the person officiating their ceremony last April ⁠19 asked whether they would “continue supporting each other, teasing each other and embracing each other, even when life gets difficult.”
The pair said “I do” and the officiant declared them “not only husband and wife, but above all a team, a crazy couple, each other’s love and home base.”
But the judge ⁠found that they had not actually sworn to fulfil their marriage duties — something that is required under Dutch law.
“The court understands that the date in the marriage deed is important to the man and woman, but cannot ignore what the law says.” It ordered the marriage removed from the Zwolle city registry.