SAN FRANCISCO: Anyone holding the digital currency bitcoin could soon face some unsettling problems — up to and including financial losses, whipsawing prices and delays in processing payments.
Though it is also possible that nothing much may change. It all depends on whether the people who maintain bitcoin can agree by July 31 to implement a major software upgrade — one designed to improve capacity on the increasingly clogged network.
Not everyone is on board. In particular, some bitcoin “miners,” who are rewarded for verifying transactions, are not supporting the changes. Any split between miners and others who use bitcoin, including a number of startups and a few big companies, could cause a panic in the $39 billion bitcoin marketplace.
Here is a look at the current dispute.
What is bitcoin, again?
Bitcoin is a digital currency that is not tied to any bank or government. Like cash, it lets users spend or receive money anonymously, or mostly so; like other online payment services, it also lets them do so over the Internet.
The coins are created by computer farms that “mine” them and verify other users’ transactions by solving complex mathematical puzzles. Miners receive bitcoin in exchange. It is also possible to exchange bitcoin for US dollars and other currencies.
Bitcoin has been touted as a currency of the future, but so far it has not proven very popular as a way to pay for goods or services. Its price, however, has soared amid the uncertainty. Bitcoin prices peaked in June above $3,000, and while it has fallen back to around $2,300, that is still more than triple what it was a year ago.
So what is the fuss about?
In a word, speed. The bitcoin network is limited in how quickly it can shuffle around digital money. As bitcoin has grown, payment delays have become more common and worrisome.
Some software developers came up with a new way to speed things up by reengineering bitcoin’s universal ledger, a file called the blockchain. Supporters of the new method include Microsoft, the bitcoin exchange Coinbase and a variety of other bitcoin proponents who would like to see the currency used more widely in commerce.
But this bitcoin software update does not have unanimous support.
What happens on July 31?
The reformers say they have run out of patience, and so have set a deadline for moving to the new system.
At 8 p.m. Eastern time on July 31, they are threatening to stop recognizing transactions confirmed by miners who have not adopted the upgrade. That would create enormous uncertainty in the bitcoin economy, since no one could really know if the bitcoin they had just paid (or received) was actually moving through the system the way it is supposed to.
Some big bitcoin miners — like Chinese bitcoin mining equipment giant Bitmain — have not signaled support for the new system. A rift could result in two or even more incompatible versions of bitcoin.
What would that mean?
Generally speaking, chaos — though mostly limited to those who use or squirrel away bitcoin. No one using bitcoin could be sure which version they held, or what might happen if they spent it or accepted bitcoin as payment.
Taking bitcoin, for instance, could leave you with currency you could not spend freely — and that might disappear entirely if it ended up being the “wrong” kind.
That is one reason the community-supported website Bitcoin.org warned users Wednesday not to accept any bitcoin up to two days prior to the deadline and to wait for confirmation the situation had been resolved before trading again.
“It is a rather awful situation,” said David Harding, who posted the warning for Bitcoin.org, in an email.
What is behind this fight?
Money, of course. Some companies that pool miners together believe the new system could result in lower transaction fees, cutting into their profits. At the same time, the reformers foresee new business opportunities in a faster, more reliable form of bitcoin.
Samson Mow, chief strategy officer at blockchain developer Blockstream, said the looming showdown has been propelled by bitcoin users frustrated at having a “simple bug fix” blocked by miners out for profit.
“People are fed up,” he said. “The users are taking back their voice.”
Bitcoin’s possible financial panic
Bitcoin’s possible financial panic
Gulf oil exports could stop within weeks, warns Qatar energy minister as Iran war continues
RIYADH: Gulf oil producers could halt exports within weeks due to the ongoing Middle East war, sending crude prices to $150 a barrel, according to Qatar’s energy minister.
In an interview published on Friday, Saad Al-Kaabi warned oil could hit the figure in two to three weeks if ships and tankers were unable to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, which is the world's most vital oil export route as it connects the biggest Gulf oil producers with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea.
Hostilities between US-Israeli forces and Iran, which began with strikes on Iran on Feb. 28, has continued to cause widespread disruption across the region, and led to the virtual closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the shutdown of multiple national airspaces.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Al-Kaabi said that “everybody that has not called for force majeure we expect will do so in the next few days that this continues. All exporters in the Gulf region will have to call force majeure.”
As well as the $150-a-barrel oil price warning, the minister also expects gas prices to rise to $40 per million British thermal units.
He added that if the war continues for a few weeks, “GDP growth around the world” will be impacted.
“Everybody's energy price is going to go higher. There will be shortages of some products and there will be a chain reaction of factories that cannot supply,” Kaabi said.
Qatar halted its liquefied natural gas production on March 2, as Iranian retaliation for US and Israeli strikes continued to target Gulf countries. The halt takes a major facility offline that accounts for roughly 20 percent of global supply, a key resource that balances demand in both Asian and European markets.
Al-Kaabi said even if the war ended immediately it would take Qatar “weeks to months” to return to a normal cycle of deliveries.
Oil continues to rise
Oil prices rose again on Friday, with Brent crude up 2.77 percent to $87.78 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate up 4.41 percent to $84.36 at 11:47 a.m. GMT
The price surge followed the start of the war on Feb. 28, which halted tanker movements through the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway that typically carries approximately one-fifth of the world’s daily oil supply, or about 20 million barrels per day.
The conflict has since spread across the key Middle East energy-producing region, causing disruptions to oil output and the shutdown of refineries and liquefied natural gas plants.
The US Treasury Department indicated it would announce measures to combat rising energy prices from the Iran conflict, including potential action involving the oil futures market, a move that would mark an unusual attempt by Washington to influence energy prices through financial markets rather than physical oil supplies.
The Treasury also granted waivers for companies to start buying sanctioned Russian oil stored on tankers to ease supply constraints that have pushed Asian refineries to reduce fuel processing.
“To enable oil to keep flowing into the global market, the Treasury Department is issuing a temporary 30-day waiver to allow Indian refiners to purchase Russian oil. This deliberately short-term measure will not provide significant financial benefit to the Russian government as it only authorizes transactions involving oil already stranded at sea,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on X.
He emphasized that India is an “essential partner” and expressed anticipation that New Delhi will ramp up purchases of US oil. “This stop-gap measure will alleviate pressure caused by Iran’s attempt to take global energy hostage.”
Imad Salamey, professor of political science and international affairs at the Lebanese American University, told Arab News that such measures “may work as short-term shock absorbers by calming markets and preventing immediate price spikes.”
However, he warned that financial engineering cannot permanently compensate for disrupted physical supply.
“If the Strait of Hormuz remains impaired, markets will eventually adjust to the reality of reduced flows. Relying too heavily on financial tools risks creating distortions where prices no longer reflect actual supply conditions,” Salamey explained.
If the war drags on and global economic costs continue to rise daily, Salamey added, the impact will spread far beyond the region. “Substituting Gulf oil with supplies from Russia or Venezuela could severely damage Gulf economies and shift long-term market dynamics,” he warned.
In an interview with Arab News, economist and Lebanese University professor Jassem Ajaka noted that “US President Donald Trump would not allow an internal uprising to undermine him before the midterm elections, suggesting he would make strategic reserves available if needed.”
He added that the US also has the capacity to ramp up shale oil production, as higher prices make extraction more economically viable. Trump said on March 4 that the US Navy may escort tankers through the Strait of Hormuz.
Aramco pricing reflects return of geopolitical risk premium
Saudi Aramco’s crude oil differentials for April 2026, reflect the severe fragmentation of the regional energy market. The OSPs showed significant premiums for light crude grades across North America, Northwest Europe, Asia, and the Mediterranean.
In the Asian market versus Oman/Dubai, Super Light crude commanded a premium of $4.15 in April, up from $2.15 in March, a change of plus $2. Extra Light crude in Asia rose to $3 from $1, while Light crude reached $2.50 from zero. Medium and Heavy grades in Asia saw smaller increases but remained in positive territory for April.
Ajaka said: “Saudi oil giant Aramco has demonstrated its ability to deliver oil through alternative routes, specifically via pipelines to the Red Sea, despite supply disruptions caused by the ongoing war.”
This, he explained, highlights how Saudi Arabia is leveraging its position as a “reliable supplier” in a region where many other producers are either sanctioned, directly targeted, or logistically constrained.
Salamey said Iran aims to widen the conflict to make it globally costly: “By threatening Gulf infrastructure and shipping, Tehran hopes GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) states will pressure Washington to negotiate and end the war.”
According to the expert, Tehran seeks sustained disruption of energy markets rather than a full blockade, since a total closure would “almost certainly” trigger a major military response. The strategy risks backfiring if direct harm to Gulf states pushes them to join the war.
Airlines grapple with airspace closures
The region’s aviation sector has faced its most severe test since the COVID-19 pandemic, with carriers across the Middle East announcing mass cancelations and emergency schedule adjustments.
Etihad Airways said it would resume a limited commercial flight schedule from March 6, operating between Abu Dhabi and a number of key destinations, while Emirates Airline anticipates a return to 100% of its network within the coming days, subject to airspace availability and the fulfilment of all operational requirements.
Qatar Airways announced that its scheduled flight operations remain temporarily suspended due to the closure of Qatari airspace, and it would provide a further update on March 7.
Saudi low-cost carrier Flynas confirmed it is operating limited exceptional flights between Saudi Arabia and Dubai starting from March 6.
Saudia Airlines, however, canceled flights to and from Amman, Kuwait, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Doha, and Bahrain, effective until March 6 at 23:59 GMT.
In Beirut, Middle East Airlines’ spokesperson Rima Makkaoui told Arab News that the carrier is “operating flights to all destinations normally, except those that have their airspace closed such as Iraq and Kuwait.”
MEA announced a strict new No-Show policy, imposing a $300 fee for economy class and $500 for business class passengers who fail to cancel bookings within the specified timeframe.
The move comes in response to passengers and travel agents booking multiple seats simultaneously, then failing to show up without cancelation, depriving other travelers of seats during this critical period.
Royal Jordanian continued operating flights to Beirut as scheduled, while flights to Doha and Dubai remained canceled according to the Queen Alia International Airport website.









