India, Britain talk up post-Brexit trade prospects

Philip Hammond, right, talks to Arun Jaitley during a joint press conference in New Delhi on Tuesday. (AP)
Updated 05 April 2017
Follow

India, Britain talk up post-Brexit trade prospects

NEW DELHI: India and Britain on Tuesday talked up their prospects of developing a new trading relationship, as their finance ministers met in New Delhi to prepare for the UK’s exit from the EU.

British Finance Minister Philip Hammond flew in to New Delhi for talks with Indian counterpart Arun Jaitley, days after Prime Minister Theresa May triggered the start of the Brexit process after last June’s referendum vote to quit the EU.
Hammond played down the risks of a so-called “hard Brexit,” in which Britain would lose access to the markets of the bloc’s other 27 nations if the two sides cannot reach a consensus deal within a two-year deadline.
“We have made the decision that we will not be part of the structure of the EU, but we have also made very clear that we want to negotiate the maximum possible open trade relationship with the EU,” Hammond told a news conference after a joint economic and financial dialogue.
“We hope to be able to negotiate a deep and special relationship with the EU that will allow us to go on trading and investing in each other’s economy, but at the same time allow us to rebuild our relationships with our partners and allies around the world.”
In India, the world’s fastest-growing large economy with a population of 1.3 billion, Britain has a massive market opportunity — but also a counterpart not known for favoring free trade.
May met a cool reception on her first visit to India last November, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressing the importance not only of trade but also of freedom of movement for his country’s skilled workers.
Still, Jaitley struck a positive note by saying, “The UK, post-Brexit, is looking at a different level of relationship with India. And there’s a huge aspiration in India itself also, to add to, and improve on, this relationship.”
No formal negotiations on a bilateral free trade agreement would be possible until Britain has formally left the EU, but Hammond said the two sides would have a “deep discussion” in the meantime.
In a joint statement, the ministers highlighted a pact for each country to invest 120 million pounds ($149 million) in a joint fund under India’s National Investment and Infrastructure Fund to invest in energy and renewables.
They also discussed efforts to make India’s rupee currency more freely tradable on international markets, and promote ‘masala’ bonds for Indian companies to borrow in their own currency from investors in the City of London.
The National Highways Authority of India, the Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency and the Indian Railway Finance Corporation all plan to issue masala bonds in the coming months, they added.


Denmark and Greenland play it cool to chill Trump

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

Denmark and Greenland play it cool to chill Trump

COPENHAGEN: After weathering Donald Trump’s repeated threats to take control of Greenland, Copenhagen and Nuuk want to restore a bit of calm ahead of the Danish general election this month, observers say.
“The tensions were very high in January with arguments flying... There needed to be some kind of de-escalation,” Astrid Andersen, a historian at the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), told AFP.
The war of words over the territory, which Trump has said that the United States needs for its “national security,” has eased somewhat.
Denmark and Greenland hope that a NATO mission to bump up defense cooperation to counter Russia and China influence in the Arctic, as well as a diplomatic working group taking in Washington, Nuuk and Copenhagen, might take some of the sting out of the issue.
“The meetings on a diplomatic level take the temperature a notch down. And so the strategy now seems to be to keep it there and try to avoid arguing through the media and social media,” Andersen said.
Yet US interest in the vast Arctic territory has not waned, and the red line on the Greenlandic — and Danish — side remains the same: any transfer of sovereignty is off the table.
President Trump’s recent proposal to send a US hospital ship to Greenland to help make up for shortcomings in the local health system was met with a firm rejection, but did not seem to deteriorate the situation.
“The Danish government will do everything it can to keep things calm,” polar geopolitics researcher Mikaa Mered said.
Denmark goes to the polls on March 24, with Greenlanders electing two MPs to the Danish parliament.
The Arctic island, a Danish colony for three centuries, still has a complicated relationship with Copenhagen, which now rules it as an autonomous territory.
While disagreeing on how to get there, Greenland’s main political parties all want independence, but in the face of pressure from Trump, Greenland and Denmark have presented a united front.
“This is the first time there has been such close cooperation between Copenhagen and Nuuk,” said Julie Rademacher, chair of the National Organization for Greenlanders in Denmark.
“We have to start our reconciliation process today,” Rademacher said, even if she conceded there was a risk that scars from the past would be exploited by the Trump administration.
Greenlandic politician Aqqaluk Lynge, founder of the Greenlandic left-wing party Inuit Ataqatigiit, believes that Copenhagen and Nuuk need to exercise caution.
“We have to be very careful about everything,” he said.
The former minister advocates stronger ties with Copenhagen, fearing that Trump will co-opt Greenland’s dreams of independence.
“He will use everything,” he said. “We must make sure these elections are not influenced by the United States.”

- Thorny issues on hold -

In Nuuk, civil society is treading carefully, afraid that their words will be appropriated by Washington.
This has led to some sensitive issues being put to the side — at least temporarily.
One of the most contentious is the campaign of forced contraception imposed on young Greenlandic women by Danish authorities from the late 1960s to 1991.
Denmark issued a formal apology in the summer of 2025 and promised compensation to the victims.
A report examining the legal implications of the human rights violations — especially whether they can be classified as genocide — was submitted to the Greenlandic government in early February but has not yet been made public.
“If the conclusion points to genocide, then it’s bound to create some new waves,” Andersen said.
“The governments will have to deal with that, and the Trump administration will most likely try to use that too,” she added.
A highly-choreographed Greenland visit last month by Denmark’s King Frederik X helped project the image of a united Kingdom of Denmark, which consists of Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands.
“Part of his visit was of course also meant to create nice counter-images to the US... Images of the king being welcomed in Greenland that are meant to demonstrate that the relations with Denmark are strong and positive,” Andersen said.