Film to expose Iran’s threat as ‘Menace in Disguise’ to US

Updated 26 February 2017
Follow

Film to expose Iran’s threat as ‘Menace in Disguise’ to US

LONDON: A documentary film set for release next month will show how Iran is the “No. 1 threat to the security of the US,” its makers said.
“Menace in Disguise” aims to convey how Iran — described in the film as “the largest sponsor of global terrorism” — is a potential destabilizing force in the US as well as the Middle East.
It was made by Margin Scope, a film company owned by the prominent Saudi lobbyist Salman Al-Ansari, who is based in Washington.
The 60-minute documentary includes interviews with diplomats and academics including James Smith, the former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, and author Michael Ledeen.
Ledeen co-authored a book with Michael Flynn, who famously said the US is “officially putting Iran on notice” during his short-lived tenure as national security adviser in US President Donald Trump’s administration.
Other interviewees for the “Menace in Disguise” film include Joseph Adam Ereli, former deputy spokesman for the US Department of State and former ambassador to Bahrain, as well as Iranian-American thinkers such as Majid Rafizadeh, who also writes a column for this newspaper.
Al-Ansari told Arab News that “Menace in Disguise” shows “how the Iran regime is the biggest threat to the national security of the US and its interests in the region.”
While Iran’s claimed interference in the Middle East has been well documented, its threat to the US has been a “missing narrative” in the public sphere, Al-Ansari added.

“The radical Iranian regime is the main sponsor of global terrorism,” he said. “The main theme of the movie is to show the Iranian aggression against the US.”

The film, which will be in English but subtitled in other languages including Arabic, will “expose the relationship between the… Iranian regime with some of the militant, radical and terrorist groups like Daesh, Al-Qaeda, and definitely Hezbollah,” Al-Ansari said.
He said Margin Scope values integrity, adding that the claims made in the film are all backed up with evidence.
“We do not mention anything without having the proof about it,” he told Arab News.
Al-Ansari defended the fact that the film does not include commentators from the Iranian regime, saying that Tehran’s position as a sponsor of terror means this is not necessary. It would be like asking a Daesh spokesman to defend the militant group’s record, he argued.
“Nobody can criticize us for not having someone from the Iranian government (to defend its) position,” Al-Ansari said.
“Iran is the sponsor of most of the terrorist groups in the region… giving some logistical and financial support, and also harboring terrorists inside Iran… We are actually speaking of a terror state. And (so) having their point, or their stand is irrelevant.”
The film does, however, aim to convey the facts through a range of interviews with US diplomats and academics, Al-Ansari said.
A promo for “Menace in Disguise” has been viewed more than 60,000 times on YouTube. Al-Ansari said his company is in conversations with US channels as well as online documentary platforms, with a view to airing the film starting in March.


Lebanon’s official media scale back Hezbollah coverage after Cabinet ban

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Lebanon’s official media scale back Hezbollah coverage after Cabinet ban

  • Information Minister Paul Morcos instructs outlets to comply with government decision
  • Journalists, social media urged to avoid content that could provoke hate speech, incitement

BEIRUT: Lebanon has begun implementing a Cabinet decision taken earlier this month to ban Hezbollah’s security and military activities by scaling back coverage of the group on official media platforms.

The measure, which was described in political circles as a significant and bold step, came after decades during which news about the party and the speeches of its leaders were published verbatim and broadcast live through official media outlets, like the state-run National News Agency, TV station Tele Liban and Radio Lebanon.

“No one is imposing censorship,” an official source told Arab News.

“Rather, there is a commitment to the decisions of the state. It is no longer possible for a speech that attacks the Lebanese government and the state to be published through its official media outlets.”

Information Minister Paul Morcos issued a circular instructing directors of official media outlets to comply with the government’s decision to ban the broadcast of speeches or statements by Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem and statements issued by the group’s armed wing, particularly when they contain criticism of the state.

Morcos also ordered that Hezbollah statements be handled in the same manner as those issued by other political parties, meaning they should not be published verbatim. He further instructed media outlets to avoid using the term “Islamic resistance,” except when it appears directly within Hezbollah statements.

The first manifestations of the decision were Tele Liban’s abstention from live broadcasting a speech by Qassem and a statement made on Tuesday by lawmaker Mohammed Raad, who heads the Hezbollah parliamentary bloc.

The group’s supporters described the move as an attempt “to restrict the resistance, Hezbollah and its leadership in the official media.”

Some argued on social media that preventing the use of terms like “resistance” or “holy warriors (Mujahedin)” and replacing them with expressions such as “Hezbollah” and “fighters” was “aimed at brainwashing and stripping the party of its resistance identity.”

During a Cabinet session on Thursday, Morcos raised the issue of content circulating on social media that incites murder and sectarian strife. This comes against the backdrop of the war that Hezbollah waged from Lebanon against Israel on March 2, without state approval, which led to a sharp division in Lebanese public opinion.

Morcos, who is also Cabinet spokesperson, said after the session that what was being published “exceeds the bounds of freedom of opinion, the press and expression.”

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam considered it to fall under the penal code, specifically regarding crimes that harm national unity, he said, and that “we are against strife in all its forms.”

Morcos also urged journalists, influencers and social media users to remain aware of the sensitivity of the current situation and to avoid content that could provoke strife, hate speech or incitement.

He acknowledged, however, that, according to a legal study, he has no authority over social media, even on media-related matters.

“The Ministry of Information does not exercise a guardianship role and lacks judicial police powers,” he said.

“These authorities rest with the public prosecution offices, which are overseen by the minister of justice and fall within the domain of criminal law and criminal prosecution.”

The ban was agreed during a Cabinet session on March 2, after Hezbollah launched six rockets from Lebanese territory toward northern Israel, the first such attack since the November 2024 ceasefire, prompting retaliatory strikes.

The Cabinet reaffirmed that “the decision of war and peace rests exclusively with the Lebanese state and its constitutional institutions,” and called on Hezbollah to hand over its weapons to the state while limiting its role to political activity within the legal and constitutional framework.