Istanbul’s jailed mayor faces fresh investigation

An image of jailed Istanbul Ekrem Imamoglu and other detained municipal employees are displayed during Turkiye's opposition opposition party, Republican People's Party (CHP) extraordinary congress, in Ankara, Turkiye. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 07 April 2026
Follow

Istanbul’s jailed mayor faces fresh investigation

  • Imamoglu is already facing multiple legal cases, including a major trial that opened last month in which he is accused of leading a criminal organization

ISTANBUL: Turkish prosecutors on Tuesday launched their latest investigation into Istanbul’s jailed opposition mayor Ekrem Imamoglu — a prominent rival of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan — on allegations of “insulting a public official,” the local prosecutor’s office said.
Imamoglu is already facing multiple legal cases, including a major trial that opened last month in which he is accused of leading a criminal organization.
The mass trial at the Silivri courthouse on Istanbul’s outskirts involves more than 400 defendants — 107 of them are in detention. The judge on Friday ordered the release of 18 of them pending trial.
During Monday’s hearing, Imamoglu reportedly took the floor and said: “There is only one criminal organization in this case, it is the prosecution.” The remark prompted an immediate reaction from prosecutors.
“An investigation has been launched by the Bakirkoy chief public prosecutor’s office for the crime of ‘insulting a public official in the performance of their duty’ due to the words allegedly spoken by the defendant Ekrem Imamoglu during the hearing on April 6,” the prosecutor’s office said in a statement posted on X.
Imamoglu was arrested on March 19 last year on a series of charges widely viewed by the opposition as an attempt to derail his prospects of challenging Erdogan at the ballot box.
He has been held in pre?trial detention since then. Prosecutors are seeking a cumulative sentence of up to 2,430 years, a move rights groups say highlights the “weaponization” of Turkiye’s judiciary to sideline political opponents.
The proceedings have been marked from the outset by tense exchanges between the judge, defense lawyers and journalists, with repeated disputes over access and seating arrangements inside the Silivri courthouse.