Trump, Prabowo eye ‘new golden age’ in Indonesia-US ties after finalizing trade deal

Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto and US President Donald Trump sign a statement agreeing to implement the reciprocal trade agreement in Washington D.C. on Feb. 19, 2026. (USTR)
Short Url
Updated 20 February 2026
Follow

Trump, Prabowo eye ‘new golden age’ in Indonesia-US ties after finalizing trade deal

  • Under the pact, Indonesia is expected to purchase around $33bn in US products
  • Indonesia’s chief negotiator says the deal is a ‘win-win’ for both countries

JAKARTA: US President Donald Trump and Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto agreed to take ties to a “new golden age,” as the two countries signed an agreement on reciprocal trade that will remove tariffs on virtually all American exports to Indonesia and lower US tariffs on Indonesian goods to 19 percent.

The deal comes after seven rounds of negotiations, which followed Trump’s threat to impose a 32 percent duty on Indonesian exports last April.

The two leaders “confirmed their strong commitment to implementing” the deal and have instructed their teams to “take further steps for a NEW GOLDEN AGE of the ever-growing” Indonesia-US relations as they met on the sidelines of the US-led Board of Peace’s inaugural meeting in Washington, according to a White House statement.

Under the deal, Jakarta is expected to purchase an estimated $33 billion in American goods, including $15 billion in US energy products and $13.5 billion in commercial aircraft, while some of Indonesia’s exports, such as coffee, spices and pharmaceuticals, would be tariff-free.

It also creates a mechanism for certain textiles and apparel products to earn tariff exemptions, with Indonesia planning to increase the sector’s exports from the current $4 billion to $40 billion in 10 years, Airlangga Hartarto, Indonesia’s coordinating minister for economic affairs and chief trade negotiator, said on Friday.

“(The deal is a) win for everyone. The philosophy of this agreement (is that) it has to be win-win, a benefit for the Indonesian people as well as to the US people because we would like to achieve the golden era for both countries,” he said during a virtual press conference.

The agreement, which Hartarto signed with US trade representative Jamieson Greer, will enter into force 90 days after both sides complete related legal procedures, but changes could still occur if both sides agree.

In the past decade, Indonesia has consistently posted trade surpluses with the US, its second-largest export market after China.

The US’ trade deficit with Indonesia was $23.7 billion in 2025, US government data showed.

Beyond tariffs, the pact touches critical minerals, with Indonesia agreeing to allow and facilitate US investment in critical minerals and energy resources, departing from a traditional caution of opening its natural resources sectors to foreign companies.

Indonesian officials also agreed to roll back several long-prevailing trade barriers, including inspections of farm products, export restrictions on critical minerals and local content requirements.

Rizky Banyualam Permana, a lecturer and doctoral researcher at the international law department at the University of Indonesia, told Arab News that “the majority of the agreement’s provisions impose obligations on Indonesia” rather than establishing genuinely mutual and reciprocal market access.

“Contrary to its title as an ‘Agreement on Reciprocal Trade,’ the agreement appears to function primarily as an instrument through which the United States dismantles Indonesia’s non-tariff measures, while offering only marginal additional market access in return,” Permana said.

Some of Jakarta’s commitments under the deal will require Indonesia to amend existing laws, which may significantly alter Indonesia’s legal and regulatory framework, he added, citing current export restrictions on raw minerals and the mandatory halal certification scheme that does not appear to apply to US products, including cosmetics.

“These changes cannot be implemented solely through executive regulation; they would require parliamentary approval, raising constitutional and political implications,” Permana said.

“This agreement should not be viewed merely as a tariff reduction scheme that benefits Indonesia. Rather, the 19 percent tariff reduction appears to come at the cost of a significant contraction of Indonesia’s regulatory autonomy.”


Lawsuit challenges Trump administration’s ending of protections for Somalis

Updated 10 March 2026
Follow

Lawsuit challenges Trump administration’s ending of protections for Somalis

  • The lawsuit cites a series of statements Trump has made describing Somalis as “garbage” and “low IQ people” who “contribute nothing.”

BOSTON: Immigrant rights advocates filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking to stop US President Donald Trump’s administration from next ​week ending legal protections that allow nearly 1,100 Somalis to live and work in the United States. The lawsuit, brought by four Somalis and two advocacy groups, challenges the US Department of Homeland Security’s decision to end Temporary Protected Status for Somali immigrants, whom Trump has derided in public remarks. Outgoing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in January announced that TPS for Somalis would end on March 17, arguing that Somalia’s conditions had improved, despite fighting continuing between Somali forces and Al-Shabab militants. The plaintiffs, who ‌include the groups ‌African Communities Together and Partnership for the Advancement ​of ‌New ⁠Americans, in the ​lawsuit filed ⁠in Boston federal court argue the move was procedurally flawed and driven by a discriminatory, predetermined agenda.
The lawsuit cites a series of statements Trump has made describing Somalis as “garbage” and “low IQ people” who “contribute nothing.”
The plaintiffs said the administration is ending TPS for Somalia and other countries due to unconstitutional bias against non-white immigrants, not based on objective assessments of country conditions.
“The termination of TPS for Somalia is racism masking as immigration policy,” ⁠Omar Farah, executive director at the legal group Muslim Advocates, said ‌in a statement.
DHS did not respond to ‌a request for comment. It has previously said TPS ​was “never intended to be a de ‌facto amnesty program.”
TPS is a form of humanitarian immigration protection that shields eligible migrants ‌from deportation and allows them to work. Under Noem, DHS has moved to end TPS for a dozen countries, sparking legal challenges. The administration on Saturday announced plans to pursue an appeal at the US Supreme Court in order to end TPS for over 350,000 Haitians. It ‌also wants the high court to allow it to end TPS for about 6,000 Syrians.

SOMALI COMMUNITY TARGETED
Somalia was first designated ⁠for TPS in ⁠1991, with its latest extension in 2024. About 1,082 Somalis currently hold TPS, and 1,383 more have pending applications, according to DHS. Somalis in Minnesota in recent months had become a target of Trump’s immigration crackdown, with officials pointing to a fraud scandal in which many people charged come from the state’s large Somali community. The Trump administration cited those fraud allegations as a basis for a months-long immigration enforcement surge in Democratic-led Minnesota, during which about 3,000 immigration agents were deployed, spurring protests and leading to the killing of two US citizens by federal agents.
In November, Trump announced he would end TPS for Somalis in Minnesota, and a month later said ​he wanted them sent “back to where they ​came from.”
The US Department of State advises against traveling to Somalia, citing crime and civil unrest among numerous factors.