Bitter pill: Taliban government shakes up Afghan medicine market

Afghanistan’s decision to overhaul its medicine market was meant to improve quality and boost domestic production, but industry specialists say the swift changes have led to a litany of problems. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 16 February 2026
Follow

Bitter pill: Taliban government shakes up Afghan medicine market

  • Afghanistan’s decision to overhaul its medicine market was meant to improve quality and boost domestic production, but industry specialists say the swift changes have led to a litany of problems

KABUL: Afghanistan’s decision to overhaul its medicine market was meant to improve quality and boost domestic production, but industry specialists say the swift changes have led to a litany of problems.
The Taliban authorities announced in November that the decades-long dependency on medicine imports from Pakistan would soon end, a step taken after deadly border clashes with their neighbor.
After the ban came into effect this month, finance ministry spokesman Abdul Qayoom Naseer told AFP that the government urged all importers to find “alternative and legal” sources to replace Pakistani supplies.
Despite a three-month grace period to end existing contracts and clear customs, the shift presents a huge challenge for a country which had imported more than half its medicine from Pakistan.
“Some of the prices have increased, some of them are short (unavailable), it has created a lot of problems for people,” said Mujeebullah Afzali, a pharmacist in the capital, Kabul.
Drugs now have to come from elsewhere, increasing transit time and transport costs, and adding logistical complexities.
The pharmacist said he had begun importing medicine through the Islam Qala crossing on the Iranian border, “which increased the transportation fee 10 to 15 percent.”
Transport costs used to account for six to seven percent of total spending on medicine, but this has now risen to 25 to 30 percent, said a person directly involved in the pharmaceutical industry, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity due to security concerns.
He estimated that the overall losses to business owners had already reached millions of dollars.
“If a medicine was short in the market before, a call was made to Pakistan, and the medicine was delivered in two to three days,” he said.
Whether legally or not, it was “delivered quickly,” he added.
‘Fill the gap’
The illicit trade in pharmaceuticals was a key driver for the overhaul, according to the health ministry.
“The biggest problem with Pakistani medicine was that we used to receive counterfeit and fake medicines,” ministry spokesman Sharafat Zaman told AFP.
He acknowledged it will take some time to shift the market, saying that officials were working with Iran, India, Bangladesh, Uzbekistan, Turkiye, China and Belarus to source medicine.
“India was second in the market, which means that now, through Indian medicines, we can cover the percentage needed,” Zaman said.
And domestic production of 600 medicines has “solved the problems” of many patients, he said.
Afghanistan already produces a variety of serums including antibiotics, according to manufacturer Milli Shifa Pharmaceutical.
The company makes 100,000 bottles daily and “can double the capability” if demand merits, CEO Nasar Ahmad Taraki told AFP.
While Afghanistan has significantly expanded its pharmaceutical sector, domestic output still only meets a small fraction of the overall demand.
The industry source told AFP that the need to import raw materials, the high energy costs and limited infrastructure mean the country cannot be entirely self-sufficient in medicine production.
“If we are provided with the facilities, then we would be able to fill the gap created by Pakistan’s situation,” he said.
Shortages and higher costs
But reshaping an industry nationwide takes more than three months.
Some drugs made in Afghanistan have proven more expensive than those imported from Pakistan, which over the years have gained consumers’ trust.
Some people believe that “if they use Pakistani medicine, they will be cured” — but not if it came from India “or any other country,” the industry source said.
Physicians, meanwhile, are also struggling, a health care provider in Kabul told AFP.
Doctors “must change prescriptions, find suitable alternatives, and spend additional time adjusting treatment plans,” he said, requesting anonymity for security reasons.
The shake-up, which ultimately is meant to end reliance on Pakistan, is complicating care in the short term and could delay treatment, he warned.
“Patients face medicine shortages, frequent switches to alternative products, and sometimes higher costs.”


Lawsuit challenges Trump administration’s ending of protections for Somalis

Updated 10 March 2026
Follow

Lawsuit challenges Trump administration’s ending of protections for Somalis

  • The lawsuit cites a series of statements Trump has made describing Somalis as “garbage” and “low IQ people” who “contribute nothing.”

BOSTON: Immigrant rights advocates filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking to stop US President Donald Trump’s administration from next ​week ending legal protections that allow nearly 1,100 Somalis to live and work in the United States. The lawsuit, brought by four Somalis and two advocacy groups, challenges the US Department of Homeland Security’s decision to end Temporary Protected Status for Somali immigrants, whom Trump has derided in public remarks. Outgoing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in January announced that TPS for Somalis would end on March 17, arguing that Somalia’s conditions had improved, despite fighting continuing between Somali forces and Al-Shabab militants. The plaintiffs, who ‌include the groups ‌African Communities Together and Partnership for the Advancement ​of ‌New ⁠Americans, in the ​lawsuit filed ⁠in Boston federal court argue the move was procedurally flawed and driven by a discriminatory, predetermined agenda.
The lawsuit cites a series of statements Trump has made describing Somalis as “garbage” and “low IQ people” who “contribute nothing.”
The plaintiffs said the administration is ending TPS for Somalia and other countries due to unconstitutional bias against non-white immigrants, not based on objective assessments of country conditions.
“The termination of TPS for Somalia is racism masking as immigration policy,” ⁠Omar Farah, executive director at the legal group Muslim Advocates, said ‌in a statement.
DHS did not respond to ‌a request for comment. It has previously said TPS ​was “never intended to be a de ‌facto amnesty program.”
TPS is a form of humanitarian immigration protection that shields eligible migrants ‌from deportation and allows them to work. Under Noem, DHS has moved to end TPS for a dozen countries, sparking legal challenges. The administration on Saturday announced plans to pursue an appeal at the US Supreme Court in order to end TPS for over 350,000 Haitians. It ‌also wants the high court to allow it to end TPS for about 6,000 Syrians.

SOMALI COMMUNITY TARGETED
Somalia was first designated ⁠for TPS in ⁠1991, with its latest extension in 2024. About 1,082 Somalis currently hold TPS, and 1,383 more have pending applications, according to DHS. Somalis in Minnesota in recent months had become a target of Trump’s immigration crackdown, with officials pointing to a fraud scandal in which many people charged come from the state’s large Somali community. The Trump administration cited those fraud allegations as a basis for a months-long immigration enforcement surge in Democratic-led Minnesota, during which about 3,000 immigration agents were deployed, spurring protests and leading to the killing of two US citizens by federal agents.
In November, Trump announced he would end TPS for Somalis in Minnesota, and a month later said ​he wanted them sent “back to where they ​came from.”
The US Department of State advises against traveling to Somalia, citing crime and civil unrest among numerous factors.