Thailand votes after three leaders in two years

1 / 2
Yodchanan Wongsawat, Pheu Thai Party prime ministerial candidate, and his wife Nantakan Silsaveekul greet people on the day of the general election at a polling station in Bangkok, Thailand, February 8, 2026. (Reuters)
2 / 2
Voters check information on a notice board during the general election, at a polling station at Wat Pho temple in Bangkok, Thailand, February 8, 2026. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 08 February 2026
Follow

Thailand votes after three leaders in two years

BANGKOK: Thais voted Sunday in an election pitting the popular reformists who came first last time against the conservative who ended up as prime minister, with ex-leader Thaksin Shinawatra looming large from his prison cell.
The Southeast Asian nation’s next government will need to contend with anaemic economic growth — the tourism sector vital but arrivals yet to return to their pre-Covid highs.
Multibillion-dollar transnational cyberscam networks operate from several neighboring countries, and a longstanding border dispute with Cambodia erupted into deadly fighting twice last year.
“We need a strong leader who can protect our sovereignty,” said Yuernyong Loonboot, 64, the first voter to cast his ballot at a polling station in Buriram, the hometown of incumbent prime minister Anutin Charnvirakul.
“Living here, the border conflict has made me anxious. War was never something we used to think about.”
No party is forecast to win an outright majority, and coalition negotiations are expected to follow the results, expected late Sunday.
The progressive People’s Party was the runaway leader in opinion polls ahead of the vote.
But while its previous incarnation, Move Forward, won the most seats at the last poll three years ago, its candidate was blocked from the premiership and the party was later dissolved.
Party leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut said after casting his ballot in Bangkok that he expected to “get the mandate from the people.”
“We promise to the people that we’ll form the people’s government to bring policies that benefit all, not the few in the country,” he added.
But ahead of voting day, political scientist Thitinan Pongsudhirak cautioned: “There are forces beyond the political arena in Thailand that call the final shots.
“It’s not about the election, it’s about the dissolutions.”
Thaksin’s Pheu Thai party came second in 2023 and formed a coalition with the third-placed conservatives Bhumjaithai, only to have its prime minister removed by court order.
He was succeeded by Thaksin’s daughter Paetongtarn Shinawatra, who was judicially ousted in turn before parliament anointed Bhumjaithai leader Anutin in September — the country’s third prime minister in two years.
Thailand’s political history is replete with military coups, bloody street protests and judicial bans on prime ministers and parties.
The last coup in 2014 was followed by five years of junta rule and a military-drafted constitution that gives significant power to institutions appointed by the senate, which is not directly elected.
“People who are elected have been able to be undermined by people who are not elected,” said political scientist Napon Jatusripitak.
“That’s not necessarily a good thing for a country where democratic experience has been turbulent.”

Populist handouts 

Move Forward was dissolved after the constitutional court ruled its pledge to reform the strict royal insult law amounted to an attempt to overthrow the constitutional monarchy.
The issue has not featured in the People’s Party campaign this time.
Anutin’s Bhumjaithai is second in the polls and analysts anticipate the conservative leader, who championed the legalization of cannabis, could retain the premiership by again allying with Pheu Thai, now ranked third.
Thailand’s most successful political party of modern times, Pheu Thai has fallen from grace after Paetongtarn was dismissed by the constitutional court over her handling of the Cambodia dispute, and with Thaksin jailed for corruption.
His nephew Yodchanan Wongsawat, seeking to become the family’s fifth prime minister, said Sunday that “Thailand must change,” but pollster NIDA puts the party on just 16 percent, a far cry from its heyday.
While Bhumjaithai touts its national defense credentials, especially after last year’s clashes with Cambodia, the People’s Party is advocating ending conscription and cutting the number of generals.
All three major parties offer various populist handouts and socioeconomic policies, including Pheu Thai’s pledge to award nine daily prizes of one million baht ($31,000) each to boost the economy.
A referendum ballot on Sunday also gives voters a chance to voice whether they want constitutional reform in principle, but with no specific measures on the table.


Pakistan rules out talks with Afghanistan, says more than 330 Afghan fighters killed in operations

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan rules out talks with Afghanistan, says more than 330 Afghan fighters killed in operations

  • More than 330 Afghan fighters killed in operations

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has ruled out talks with Afghanistan until there is an end to “terrorism” emanating from Afghan soil, officials said on Friday. The statement follows the killing of more than 330 Afghan fighters in cross-border skirmishes this week.

The latest clashes between the neighbors erupted after Pakistani airstrikes on Afghan territory last weekend triggered retaliatory attacks along the border on Thursday, escalating long‑simmering tensions over Pakistan’s claim that Afghanistan shelters Pakistani Taliban militants. Afghanistan denies this, saying Pakistan is deflecting blame for its own security failures.

Pakistani Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said his country had killed 331 Afghan fighters, destroyed over 100 posts and targeted 37 military locations across Afghanistan. Afghan officials have said more than 50 Pakistani soldiers have been killed and several Pakistan posts captured. Neither casualty figures nor battlefield claims by either side could be independently verified.

Meanwhile, Mosharraf Zaidi, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s spokesperson for foreign media, ruled out any talks with Afghanistan until Kabul addresses the issue, while the US expressed support for what it called Pakistan’s “right to defend itself” against attacks from Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers.

“There won’t be any talks, there is nothing to talk about ... Terrorism from Afghanistan has to end,” Zaidi told state-run Pakistan TV Digital, saying Islamabad would continue to target militant havens inside Afghanistan.

“Pakistan’s responsibility is to protect its citizens. If we know that there is a terrorist in point A and we know that there is a terrorist enabler at point A, we will find a weapon to land at point A and eliminate the threat.”

Zaidi said he did not expect Pakistan to deviate from this position: “We have clearly articulated what we are doing and what we plan on continuing to do and what it will take for us to stop doing what we are doing.”

He added: “And we will expect that both the international community and the regime in question, the Afghan Taliban, will come to their senses and will help reduce instability and disorder in this region.”

Pakistan is a major non-NATO ally of Washington, while the US considers the Afghan Taliban a “terrorist” group.

“The United States supports Pakistan’s right to defend itself against attacks from the Taliban, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist group,” Reuters quoted a State Department spokesperson as saying.

US diplomat Allison Hooker said on X she had spoken with Pakistan Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch on Friday.

The State Department spokesperson said Washington was aware of the escalation in tensions and “outbreak of fighting between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban,” adding the US was “saddened by the loss of life.”

“The Taliban have consistently failed to uphold their counterterrorism commitments,” it said. “Terrorist groups use Afghanistan as a launching pad for their heinous attacks.”

Meanwhile, Afghan Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid called for talks to resolve the crisis.

“We have always emphasized peaceful resolution, and now too we want the issue to be resolved through dialogue,” he said on Friday afternoon.

Asked what Pakistan desired, Tarar said: “Neutralizing the threat and ensuring that Pakistan is safe. Because for us, we’ve been good neighbors, we’ve been very friendly neighbors, we’ve been very, very generous neighbors. Our generosity, unfortunately, has often been seen as our weakness. So the objective, aim is to neutralize the threat and make Pakistan safe.”

He added it was too early to comment on a ceasefire as it was an evolving situation.