Israelis carry out more than 20 raids in south Lebanon, Bekaa region

1 / 2
Repeated airstrikes shook the eastern mountain range without prior warnings, targeting the upper parts of the Brital highlands in the Baalbek district of Northern Bekaa, and the Al-Jbour area in Western Bekaa. (Supplied)
2 / 2
Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted the hilltops of the Al-Rihane mountain in southern Lebanon on Jan. 9, 2026. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 09 January 2026
Follow

Israelis carry out more than 20 raids in south Lebanon, Bekaa region

  • Tel Aviv claims strikes were response to Hezbollah’s attempts at rebuilding military infrastructure
  • Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Rajji tells Iranian counterpart that Tehran must engage in talks with Beirut to find ‘new approach to the issue of Hezbollah’s weapons’

BEIRUT: Israeli warplanes on Friday carried out more than 20 raids across Lebanon, targeting sites in the south and Northern Bekaa.

Tel Aviv said the attacks were a response to an ongoing breach of the ceasefire agreement, and claimed “Hezbollah is rebuilding its military capabilities in violation of the agreements between Lebanon and Israel.”

The raids targeted the valleys between Houmin in Nabatieh and Deir Al-Zahrani north of the Litani River, in addition to Al-Aaishiyah, Al-Zagharin, Iklim Al-Tuffah, Kfarkila, Ain Qana, the Sajd Heights and Al-Rayhan. In addition, the Israeli army targeted the town of Al-Baissariyeh in Saida.

Repeated airstrikes shook the eastern mountain range without prior warnings, targeting the upper parts of the Brital highlands in the Baalbek district of Northern Bekaa, and the Al-Jbour area in Western Bekaa.

Israeli army spokesperson Avichay Adraee accused Iran-backed Hezbollah of attempting to rebuild its military capabilities, claiming the Israeli army attacked the group’s “targets and raided a manufacturing site, weapon depots and missile-launching pads used by Hezbollah.”

In a post on social media, Adraee vowed that “the Israeli army will continue to work on removing any threat.”

As part of Israel’s campaign — albeit at a reduced pace — an Israeli force penetrated the border village of Yaroun and destroyed a building in the Al-Bayader neighborhood before withdrawing, according to a Lebanese military source.

An Israeli raid on Thursday targeted a car on the road between Zaita and Bnaafoul, resulting in one fatality.

The latest incidents came as the Lebanese Army Command announced on Thursday the completion of the first phase of a plan to restrict weapons to state hands south of the Litani River. A plan to restrict weapons north of the river is set to be prepared and submitted to the Cabinet next month, as the military moves to contain weapons and prevent their smuggling, transfer, or use.

Iranian foreign minister

Amid the Israeli strikes, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who is currently in Beirut, has held a series of meetings with Lebanese officials.

Araghchi affirmed that Iran “supports Lebanon’s independence, unity and sovereignty,” and added that “defending the country is the Lebanese government’s responsibility.”

He said: “Iran supports Hezbollah as a resistance group, but it does not interfere at all in its affairs, and any decision related to Lebanon is left to the party itself.”

He described his visit to Lebanon as part of “strengthening and developing relationships between both countries.”

Araghchi — who is visiting Beirut amid mass protests at home over government spending during a cost-of-living crisis — met Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Rajji, who had declined to receive him on a previous visit.

He told him that “his country seeks to build a relationship with Lebanon based on amicability and mutual respect, within the framework of the two governments, with all their institutions and components.”

He said that “a joint confrontation of challenges and risks requires continued dialogue and consultation despite differences in approaches to certain files,” stressing that “the unity of Lebanon’s sects under the authority of the Lebanese government would protect Lebanon and achieve its stability.”

According to his media office, Rajji reaffirmed that “defending Lebanon is the (sole) responsibility of the Lebanese state.”

He added: “When the state possesses its strategic decision-making power, holds the decision of war and peace, and confines weapons to its own hands, it can then request assistance from countries, including Iran.”

Rajji also emphasized that “building a state capable of defending its land and its people cannot happen while there is an armed organization outside its authority.”

He addressed Araghchi by asking whether Tehran “would accept the presence of an illegal armed organization on its own territory.”

Rajji called on Iran to engage in talks with Lebanon to find “a new approach to the issue of Hezbollah’s weapons, drawing on Iran’s relationship with the party, so that these weapons do not become a pretext for weakening Lebanon.”

He pointed out that “the Shiite community is not being targeted, and the only sustainable guarantee for it, and for the other communities, is unity, and being under the authority of the state and the rule of law.”

He added: “Experience has shown that weapons have not been able to defend the Shiite community, or Lebanon and all its components.”

Rajji urged his Iranian counterpart to “put a stop to the statements and stances of some Iranian officials, which are considered a blatant interference in Lebanese affairs.”

The European Council

The Israeli actions coincided with the arrival in Beirut of a delegation from the European Council headed by its President Antonio Costa, along with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who was accompanied by an EU delegation.

In remarks made while meeting Lebanese officials, Costa welcomed “the Lebanese army’s announcement that it has completed the first phase of the plan to disarm Hezbollah south of the Litani River.”

During his meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Costa reaffirmed “the commitment to Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,” stressing that “there is no room for armed militias that undermine stability.”

 


Israel aims to ensure more Palestinians are let out of Gaza than back in

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Israel aims to ensure more Palestinians are let out of Gaza than back in

  • It was still not clear how Israel planned to enforce limits on the number of Palestinians entering Gaza from Egypt
  • Sources said Israeli officials had insisted on setting up a military checkpoint in Gaza to screen Palestinians moving in and out

TEL AVIV: Israel wants to restrict the number of Palestinians entering Gaza through the border crossing with Egypt to ensure that more are allowed out than in, three sources briefed on the matter said ahead of the border’s expected opening next week.
The head of a transitional Palestinian committee backed by the US to temporarily administer Gaza, Ali Shaath, announced on Thursday that the Rafah Border Crossing — effectively the sole route in or out of Gaza for nearly all of the more than 2 million people who live there — would open next week.
The border was supposed to have opened during the initial phase of President Donald Trump’s plan to end the war, under a ceasefire reached in October between Israel and Hamas.
Earlier this month, Washington announced that the plan had now moved into the second phase, under which Israel is expected to withdraw troops further from Gaza ⁠and Hamas is due to yield control of the territory’s administration. The Gaza side of the crossing has been under Israeli military control since 2024.
The three sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue, said it was still not clear how Israel planned to enforce limits on the number of Palestinians entering Gaza from Egypt, or what ratio of exits to entries it aimed to achieve.
Israeli officials have spoken in the past about encouraging Palestinians to emigrate from Gaza, although they deny intending to transfer the population out by force. Palestinians ⁠are highly sensitive to any suggestion that Gazans could be expelled, or that those who leave temporarily could be barred from returning.
The Rafah Crossing is expected to be staffed by Palestinians affiliated with the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority and monitored by EU personnel, as took place during an earlier, weeks-long ceasefire between Israel and Hamas early last year.
The Israeli prime minister’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment for this story. The military referred questions to the government, declining to comment.
The three sources said that Israel also wants to establish a military checkpoint inside Gaza near the border, through which all Palestinians entering or leaving would be required to pass and be subjected to Israeli security checks.
Two other sources also said that Israeli officials had insisted on setting up a military checkpoint in Gaza to screen Palestinians moving in and out.
The US Embassy in ⁠Israel did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Washington supported Israel in limiting the number of Palestinians entering Gaza or setting up a checkpoint to screen those entering and leaving.
Under the initial phase of Trump’s plan, the Israeli military partially pulled back its forces within Gaza but retained control of 53 percent of the territory including the entire land border with Egypt. Nearly all of the territory’s population lives in the rest of Gaza, under Hamas control and mostly in makeshift tents or damaged buildings.
The sources said that it was not clear how individuals would be dealt with if they were blocked by Israel’s military from passing through its checkpoint, particularly those entering from Egypt.
The Israeli government has repeatedly objected to the opening of the border, with some officials saying Hamas must first return the body of an Israeli police officer held in Gaza, the final human remains of a hostage due to be transferred under the ceasefire’s first phase.
US officials in private say that Washington, not Israel, is driving the rollout of the president’s plan to end the war.