Nationalist Bollywood hit ‘Dhurandhar’ ignites India-Pakistan controversy

The undated picture movie posture of Bollywood movie ‘Dhurandhar.’ (YouTube)
Short Url
Updated 08 January 2026
Follow

Nationalist Bollywood hit ‘Dhurandhar’ ignites India-Pakistan controversy

  • Movie stars Ranveer Singh as an Indian intelligence agent who infiltrates alleged criminal networks in Karachi
  • Film has drawn sharp criticism from Pakistani officials while becoming one of the year’s biggest hits in India

A Bollywood spy thriller set in Pakistan has sparked heated debate across both countries over its portrayal of cross-border tensions, even as the film breaks box office records in India amid a surge in nationalist cinema.

“Dhurandhar,” starring Ranveer Singh as an Indian intelligence agent infiltrating criminal networks in Pakistan’s Karachi, has drawn sharp criticism from Pakistani officials and some international critics while becoming one of the year’s biggest commercial hits in India.

The 3.5-hour film, directed by Aditya Dhar, weaves real historical events including the 1999 plane hijacking, the 2001 Parliament attack, and the 2008 Mumbai attacks into a fictional narrative about an Indian spy’s mission to dismantle alleged links between Karachi gangs and terror networks.

Released Dec. 5 with minimal publicity, “Dhurandhar” has grossed more than 12.15 billion rupees ($134.76 million) in ticket sales, making it the highest-grossing Bollywood film last year. 

“It is a unique thing. Most films are set in India, but in this film, a RAW agent infiltrates Pakistan and is living there, hiding his identity, and the film portrays all of that through this setup, about Karachi and everything. That’s why it is such a good film. I mean, it is very important to watch this film,” said movie-goer Naresh Kumar.

The film represents a growing trend in Indian cinema toward nationalist blockbusters that align with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s policies, following controversial hits like “The Kashmir Files” and “The Kerala Story” that sparked debates over historical accuracy while achieving commercial success.

In India, some film critics faced online harassment for negative reviews, prompting the Film Critics Guild to condemn “targeted attacks” against reviewers.

“Films that evoke patriotic fervor among audiences generally do well, but that is not to say that any film with this kind of subject would have done well,” said Bollywood film analyst Komal Nahta. “Everything seems to have gone right with the film.” 

The controversy highlights how cinema continues to reflect decades-old tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbors, who have fought four wars since partition in 1947. Fighting erupted between the countries in May following an attack on tourists in Kashmir that India blamed on Pakistan-backed militants.

In Pakistan’s Lyari neighborhood, which was depicted in the film, residents criticized the portrayal as inaccurate.

“It is a completely baseless movie because our neighboring country doesn’t know anything about our country,” said Mohammad Zohaib, a Lyari resident and burger shop owner. “They don’t know anything about Lyari, so how can they make a completely realistic film about someone?” 

The Pakistan Peoples Party filed legal action in a Karachi court last month over the film’s unauthorized use of assassinated former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto’s image and its portrayal of party leaders as terrorist sympathizers.

“About 10 percent of what has been shown in the movie is reality, 90 percent is not real,” said Khizer Abdul Wahid, a Lyari resident and beauty salon owner.

Pakistan banned Indian films in 2019, but Bollywood remains popular there with audiences using VPNs or illegal downloads to watch new releases.

Theatre admissions in India have fallen 45 percent since their 2018 peak of 1.58 billion, according to Ernst and Young, as streaming services offer content that complements cheap mobile data available to most Indians.

Even global hits like the latest Avatar film struggled to secure screens due to “Dhurandhar’s” strong showing, analysts said.


Mini op-ed: Recognising a shift in how people relate to wellness, self-care

Updated 05 March 2026
Follow

Mini op-ed: Recognising a shift in how people relate to wellness, self-care

DUBAI: I have spent nearly a decade working in the beauty industry in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and Ramadan always has a way of prompting change; in habits, in priorities, and in the routines people have been carrying without question. Speaking from my own corner of the industry, one of these habits is often hair removal.

Saudi Arabia’s beauty and personal care market was valued at about $7.56 billion in 2025 and is set to grow to an estimated $8.03 billion in 2026. Within that growth, personal care encompassing the daily (sometimes unglamorous) routines hold the largest share. But market size alone does not tell the full story. A study conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, found that three quarters of Saudi women experienced complications from temporary hair removal methods, including skin irritation, in-grown hairs and hyperpigmentation. A separate 2025 study published in the Majmaah Journal of Health Sciences found that laser hair removal was both the most considered and most commonly undergone cosmetic procedure among Saudi respondents, yet dissatisfaction with cosmetic procedure outcomes was reported by nearly half of all participants. The numbers point to a gap not in demand, but in results. 

When I launched a specialized electrolysis practice in the UAE in 2016, it was with a clear gap in mind; safe, regulated, permanent hair removal for the region’s specific needs. The range of hair types here and the prevalence of conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome, or PCOS, demanded a method that works across all of them.  Electrolysis is the only method recognized by the US Food and Drug Administration and American Marketing Association as achieving true permanent results, regardless of hair color or type. 

Despite this, awareness in Saudi Arabia remains limited. Part of this is familiarity, laser has dominated the conversation for years, and electrolysis, which requires more sessions and a licensed electrologist’s precision, has struggled to break through. Part of it is education. Many clients who come to us have never heard of electrolysis; they come because they have exhausted everything else. 

Right now, Saudi Arabia is in the middle of a genuine transformation in how people relate to wellness and self-care. The beauty market is maturing, consumers are asking harder questions of the brands they choose and Vision 2030 has not just shaped the economy, it has shaped how Saudis are showing up in their own lives. In that context, the idea of choosing permanence over repetition lands differently.
 
Mariela Marcantetti is a beauty industry entrepreneur based between Saudi Arabia and the UAE.