Chile votes in presidential race expected to lurch country to the right

Chile's presidential candidate Jose Antonio Kast, of the Partido Republicano party, waves a Chilean flag after the first exit poll results of the general election in Santiago on November 16, 2025. (Photo by Marvin RECINOS / AFP)
Short Url
Updated 14 December 2025
Follow

Chile votes in presidential race expected to lurch country to the right

  • Right-wing candidate Jose Antonio Kast faces leftist Jeannette Jara
  • Kast is seen as most likely to triumph

SANTIAGO: Chileans will vote in a runoff presidential election on Sunday that is expected to result in the South American country’s sharpest rightward shift since the end of the military dictatorship in 1990. Nearly 15.6 million registered voters in Chile are set to cast ballots.

Polls will close at 6 p.m. local time (2100 GMT), pending voter lines, with initial results expected soon after. The runoff pits Jose Antonio Kast, from the far-right Republican Party that he founded, against Jeannette Jara, the incumbent leftist government’s coalition candidate from the Communist Party.

While Jara won November’s first round with 26.85 percent of the vote, Kast beat out an array of right-wing candidates to finish second with 23.92 percent. Most of the voters who supported those candidates are projected to go for Kast, which would give him more than 50 percent of the vote and the presidency.
CAMPAIGNS CLOSE WITH FOCUS ON CRIME
As the campaigns wound down, both candidates threw jabs at each other, but also focused on the main topic that has come to define the election: crime.
Speaking on Thursday from behind a clear protective barrier in the southern city of Temuco, the capital of a region rattled by conflict between Indigenous Mapuche groups and the government, Kast described a country in chaos and said he would restore order.

“This government caused chaos, this government caused disorder, this government caused insecurity,” the 59-year-old lawyer said.

“We’re going to do the opposite, we’re going to create order, security and trust.”

While Chile remains one of the safest countries in Latin America, a recent surge in organized crime and immigration has rattled the electorate and become the main concern among voters.

The issue quickly became a thorn in the side of leftist President Gabriel Boric, who rose to power on a wave of progressive optimism following widespread protests against inequality and promises of drafting a new constitution. Boric, who is barred from re-election because of a prohibition on consecutive presidential terms, scrambled to adjust, boosting funding for police forces, creating task forces dedicated to fighting organized crime, and deploying the military to the country’s northern border with Peru and Bolivia.

But it wasn’t enough for many voters. Boric has been struggling with low approval ratings, while Kast’s hard-line proposals against crime and immigration have attracted support.

“This country needs important reforms, we need to retake the path we’ve had for decades because we’re completely lost,” Jose Pinochet, a 55-year old lawyer, said while getting his shoes shined on a street in Santiago.

Antonia Moreno, 21, said she would vote for Jara but did not think it likely she would win.
“Regretfully we’ll be part of those countries where the far-right gains in Congress and the executive branch,” she said.
CONSISTENT HARDLINER
A Kast victory is likely to be cheered by investors who are hoping that a market-friendly government will accelerate economic reforms, including deregulation and changes to the copper-rich country’s pension system and capital markets.

The Chilean peso strengthened and MSCI’s Chile equity benchmark surged after the first-round results last month. Although no clear majority emerged in the Senate or Congress in that vote, Kast is expected to eventually be able to pass some economic reforms if he wins the runoff.

“The third time’s a charm,” he said during a speech after he made it to the runoff in November. This is his third run for president, and second runoff after losing to Boric in 2021.

Many of Kast’s views were seen as too extreme by voters in 2021, but now they have found a more sympathetic hearing among an electorate craving security and weary of the traditional political parties.

“I see the expression of the right, of the far right, as an escape valve for the rejection of politics in Chile,” said Marta Lagos, an analyst, pollster and founding director of Latinobarometro.

This is the first presidential election under a mandatory voting provision with automatic registration for those older than 18 and fines levied on anyone who doesn’t vote. That change adds an element of uncertainty, with opinion polls showing about 20 percent of voters still undecided or saying they will leave their ballots blank.

“There’s a percentage of voters who aren’t comfortable with either Jara or Kast,” said Guillermo Holzmann, a political analyst from the University of Valparaiso.

“The question is: Who do those blank or null votes favor?” During her closing campaign event on Thursday in the northern city of Coquimbo, Jara vowed to be tough on crime, touted the need for strong social programs, and urged people not to leave their ballots blank.

“Talk to people who are thinking about voting blank. There’s a lot at stake and we have to move forward, not back,” said the 51-year-old lawyer and former minister of labor in the Boric government.


Trump insists he struck Iran on his own terms

Updated 04 March 2026
Follow

Trump insists he struck Iran on his own terms

  • “We are now a nation divided between those who want to fight wars for Israel and those who just want peace and to be able to afford their bills and health insurance,” Marjorie Taylor Greene posted on X.
  • Rubio himself doubled down on Tuesday after meeting with US House and Senate members, while insisting that “No, I told you this had to happen anyway”

WASHINGTON, United States: President Donald Trump and his team scrambled Tuesday to reclaim the narrative on why he decided to attack Iran, after his top diplomat suggested the US struck only after learning of an imminent Israeli strike.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio alarmed Democrats — who say only Congress can declare war — as well as many of Trump’s MAGA supporters on Monday when he said: “We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action.”
“We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn’t pre-emptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties,” Rubio told reporters.
Administration officials quickly backpedalled, insisting Trump authorized the strikes because Tehran was not seriously negotiating an accord on limiting its nuclear ambitions, and the United States needed to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities.
“No, Marco Rubio Didn’t Claim That Israel Dragged Trump into War with Iran,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted Tuesday on X.
At an Oval Office meeting later with Germany’s chancellor, Trump went further, saying that “Based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they (Iran) were going to attack first. And I didn’t want that to happen.”
“So, if anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand.”

- Had to happen? -

Rubio himself doubled down on Tuesday after meeting with US House and Senate members, while insisting that “No, I told you this had to happen anyway.”
“The president made a decision. The decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide... behind this ability to conduct an attack.”
Critics seized on the muddied messaging to accuse Trump of precipitating the country into a war without a clear rationale, without informing Congress — and without a clear idea of how it might end.
They noted that just two weeks ago, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed Trump again in Washington to take a hard line, in their seventh meeting since Trump’s return to power last year.
Some Republican allies rallied behind the president, with Senator Tom Cotton, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, insisting that “No one pushes or drags Donald Trump anywhere.”
“He acts in the vital national security interest of the United States,” Cotton told the “Fox & Friends” morning show.
But as crucial US midterm elections approach that could see Republicans lose their congressional majority, Trump risks shedding supporters who had welcomed his pledge to end foreign military interventions.
“We are now a nation divided between those who want to fight wars for Israel and those who just want peace and to be able to afford their bills and health insurance,” Marjorie Taylor Greene, a top former Trump ally and a major figure in the populist and isolationist hard right, posted on X.