Chile votes in presidential race expected to lurch country to the right

Chile's presidential candidate Jose Antonio Kast, of the Partido Republicano party, waves a Chilean flag after the first exit poll results of the general election in Santiago on November 16, 2025. (Photo by Marvin RECINOS / AFP)
Short Url
Updated 14 December 2025
Follow

Chile votes in presidential race expected to lurch country to the right

  • Right-wing candidate Jose Antonio Kast faces leftist Jeannette Jara
  • Kast is seen as most likely to triumph

SANTIAGO: Chileans will vote in a runoff presidential election on Sunday that is expected to result in the South American country’s sharpest rightward shift since the end of the military dictatorship in 1990. Nearly 15.6 million registered voters in Chile are set to cast ballots.

Polls will close at 6 p.m. local time (2100 GMT), pending voter lines, with initial results expected soon after. The runoff pits Jose Antonio Kast, from the far-right Republican Party that he founded, against Jeannette Jara, the incumbent leftist government’s coalition candidate from the Communist Party.

While Jara won November’s first round with 26.85 percent of the vote, Kast beat out an array of right-wing candidates to finish second with 23.92 percent. Most of the voters who supported those candidates are projected to go for Kast, which would give him more than 50 percent of the vote and the presidency.
CAMPAIGNS CLOSE WITH FOCUS ON CRIME
As the campaigns wound down, both candidates threw jabs at each other, but also focused on the main topic that has come to define the election: crime.
Speaking on Thursday from behind a clear protective barrier in the southern city of Temuco, the capital of a region rattled by conflict between Indigenous Mapuche groups and the government, Kast described a country in chaos and said he would restore order.

“This government caused chaos, this government caused disorder, this government caused insecurity,” the 59-year-old lawyer said.

“We’re going to do the opposite, we’re going to create order, security and trust.”

While Chile remains one of the safest countries in Latin America, a recent surge in organized crime and immigration has rattled the electorate and become the main concern among voters.

The issue quickly became a thorn in the side of leftist President Gabriel Boric, who rose to power on a wave of progressive optimism following widespread protests against inequality and promises of drafting a new constitution. Boric, who is barred from re-election because of a prohibition on consecutive presidential terms, scrambled to adjust, boosting funding for police forces, creating task forces dedicated to fighting organized crime, and deploying the military to the country’s northern border with Peru and Bolivia.

But it wasn’t enough for many voters. Boric has been struggling with low approval ratings, while Kast’s hard-line proposals against crime and immigration have attracted support.

“This country needs important reforms, we need to retake the path we’ve had for decades because we’re completely lost,” Jose Pinochet, a 55-year old lawyer, said while getting his shoes shined on a street in Santiago.

Antonia Moreno, 21, said she would vote for Jara but did not think it likely she would win.
“Regretfully we’ll be part of those countries where the far-right gains in Congress and the executive branch,” she said.
CONSISTENT HARDLINER
A Kast victory is likely to be cheered by investors who are hoping that a market-friendly government will accelerate economic reforms, including deregulation and changes to the copper-rich country’s pension system and capital markets.

The Chilean peso strengthened and MSCI’s Chile equity benchmark surged after the first-round results last month. Although no clear majority emerged in the Senate or Congress in that vote, Kast is expected to eventually be able to pass some economic reforms if he wins the runoff.

“The third time’s a charm,” he said during a speech after he made it to the runoff in November. This is his third run for president, and second runoff after losing to Boric in 2021.

Many of Kast’s views were seen as too extreme by voters in 2021, but now they have found a more sympathetic hearing among an electorate craving security and weary of the traditional political parties.

“I see the expression of the right, of the far right, as an escape valve for the rejection of politics in Chile,” said Marta Lagos, an analyst, pollster and founding director of Latinobarometro.

This is the first presidential election under a mandatory voting provision with automatic registration for those older than 18 and fines levied on anyone who doesn’t vote. That change adds an element of uncertainty, with opinion polls showing about 20 percent of voters still undecided or saying they will leave their ballots blank.

“There’s a percentage of voters who aren’t comfortable with either Jara or Kast,” said Guillermo Holzmann, a political analyst from the University of Valparaiso.

“The question is: Who do those blank or null votes favor?” During her closing campaign event on Thursday in the northern city of Coquimbo, Jara vowed to be tough on crime, touted the need for strong social programs, and urged people not to leave their ballots blank.

“Talk to people who are thinking about voting blank. There’s a lot at stake and we have to move forward, not back,” said the 51-year-old lawyer and former minister of labor in the Boric government.


WHO chief says reasons US gave for withdrawing ‘untrue’

Updated 25 January 2026
Follow

WHO chief says reasons US gave for withdrawing ‘untrue’

  • US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a joint statement Thursday that Washington had formally withdrawn from the WHO
  • And in a post on X, Tedros added: “Unfortunately, the reasons cited for the US decision to withdraw from WHO are untrue”

GENEVA: The head of the UN’s health agency on Saturday pushed back against Washington’s stated reasons for withdrawing from the World Health Organization, dismissing US criticism of the WHO as “untrue.”
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus warned that US announcement this week that it had formally withdrawn from the WHO “makes both the US and the world less safe.”
And in a post on X, he added: “Unfortunately, the reasons cited for the US decision to withdraw from WHO are untrue.”
He insisted: “WHO has always engaged with the US, and all Member States, with full respect for their sovereignty.”
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a joint statement Thursday that Washington had formally withdrawn from the WHO.
They accused the agency, of numerous “failures during the Covid-19 pandemic” and of acting “repeatedly against the interests of the United States.”
The WHO has not yet confirmed that the US withdrawal has taken effect.

- ‘Trashed and tarnished’ -

The two US officials said the WHO had “trashed and tarnished” the United States, and had compromised its independence.
“The reverse is true,” the WHO said in a statement.
“As we do with every Member State, WHO has always sought to engage with the United States in good faith.”
The agency strenuously rejected the accusation from Rubio and Kennedy that its Covid response had “obstructed the timely and accurate sharing of critical information that could have saved American lives and then concealed those failures.”
Kennedy also suggested in a video posted to X Friday that the WHO was responsible for “the Americans who died alone in nursing homes (and) the small businesses that were destroyed by reckless mandates” to wear masks and get vaccinated.
The US withdrawal, he insisted, was about “protecting American sovereignty, and putting US public health back in the hands of the American people.”
Tedros warned on X that the statement “contains inaccurate information.”
“Throughout the pandemic, WHO acted quickly, shared all information it had rapidly and transparently with the world, and advised Member States on the basis of the best available evidence,” the agency said.
“WHO recommended the use of masks, vaccines and physical distancing, but at no stage recommended mask mandates, vaccine mandates or lockdowns,” it added.
“We supported sovereign governments to make decisions they believed were in the best interests of their people, but the decisions were theirs.”

- Withdrawal ‘raises issues’ -

The row came as Washington struggled to dislodge itself from the WHO, a year after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to that effect.
The one-year withdrawal process reached completion on Thursday, but Kennedy and Rubio regretted in their statement that the UN health agency had “not approved our withdrawal and, in fact, claims that we owe it compensation.”
WHO has highlighted that when Washington joined the organization in 1948, it reserved the right to withdraw, as long as it gave one year’s notice and had met “its financial obligations to the organization in full for the current fiscal year.”
But Washington has not paid its 2024 or 2025 dues, and is behind around $260 million.
“The notification of withdrawal raises issues,” WHO said Saturday, adding that the topic would be examined during WHO’s Executive Board meeting next month and by the annual World Health Assembly meeting in May.
“We hope the US will return to active participation in WHO in the future,” Tedros said Saturday.
“Meanwhile, WHO remains steadfastly committed to working with all countries in pursuit of its core mission and constitutional mandate: the highest attainable standard of health as a fundamental right for all people.”