British group Bob Vylan sue Irish broadcaster RTE for defamation

Bob Vylan performing in front of a Palestinian flag at Glastonbury in June. The group are suing RTE for a report accusing them of being antisemitic during the performance. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 10 December 2025
Follow

British group Bob Vylan sue Irish broadcaster RTE for defamation

  • Punk-rap duo launch proceedings at Irish High Court over TV news report that accused them of ‘antisemitic’ chants during Glastonbury Festival performance
  • Solicitors say ‘death to the IDF’ chant had been ‘criticizing military actions’ by the Israeli army and at no point targeted Jewish people

LONDON: British rap duo Bob Vylan are suing Ireland’s national broadcaster, RTE, for defamation over its reporting of their chants from the stage at the Glastonbury Festival in opposition to the actions of the Israeli military during the war in Gaza.

Following the group’s performance in June, RTE News reported that lead singer Pascal Robinson-Foster had led antisemitic chanting.

“These allegations are categorically denied by our clients and are entirely untrue,” Phoenix Law Solicitors, acting for the group, said on Tuesday. The firm confirmed that legal proceedings had been launched at the High Court in Dublin on Monday on behalf of Robinson-Foster and drummer Wade Laurence George.

During the performance, Robinson-Foster led chants of “Death, death, to the IDF,” a reference to the Israel Defense Forces, and “Free, free, Palestine.”

The performance sparked an outcry in the UK, including accusations that the group were guilty of hate speech, as well as criticism of the BBC for allowing the chants to go out on a live stream.

The group maintain that their actions were not antisemitic but merely a show of support for Palestinians suffering in Gaza.

“At their Glastonbury performance, Bob Vylan made statements expressing support for Palestinian self-determination and criticizing military actions by the Israel Defence Forces,” Phoenix Law Solicitors said.

“At no point did their comments target Jewish people or express hatred towards any group.

“In fact, our client has stated: ‘We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people.’ The comments made were politically charged but not antisemitic in nature.”

The group had requested an apology and retraction from RTE, the law firm added, but the broadcaster “failed to address the harm caused.” The aim of the legal proceedings is to “seek redress for the significant reputational and emotional damage suffered by our clients.”

Since the start of the war in Gaza in 2023, following the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel led by Hamas, the Israeli government and its supporters have increasingly accused those critical of the state’s actions during the conflict of antisemitism.

More than 70,000 Palestinians have been killed during the war, according to health officials in Gaza, and Israel’s actions been widely condemned by human rights groups, academics and many governments as amounting to genocide.

Bob Vylan’s festival performance took place at a time when scores of Palestinians were being killed each day, including many gunned down as they tried to obtain food from humanitarian aid hubs.

“Our clients are no stranger to utilizing their freedom of expression to speak out against the genocide in Gaza,” said Darragh Mackin, a Phoenix Law solicitor.

“There is however a fundamental distinction between speaking critically about the role of the Israeli state forces, and being antisemitic.”

RTE has said it does not comment on legal proceedings.

After the Glastonbury performance, Bob Vylan faced a backlash in the UK and abroad. Organizers of several music festivals canceled scheduled performances by the group, and US authorities revoked their visas. Robinson-Foster was interviewed by police last month but has not been charged with any crime.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the incident as “appalling hate speech.” The BBC issued an apology for broadcasting the performance, saying it regretted not taking dawn the live stream.

During a podcast appearance in October, Robinson-Foster defended his actions and said the criticism his group had faced was “minimal compared to what people in Palestine are going through.”


Russia awaits an answer from the US on New START as nuclear treaty ticks down

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Russia awaits an answer from the US on New START as nuclear treaty ticks down

  • Russian leader Vladimir Putin has proposed keeping the treaty’s limits
  • US President Donald Trump has said Putin’s proposal sounded ‘like a good idea’
MOSCOW: Russia on Wednesday said it was still awaiting a formal answer from Washington on President Vladimir Putin’s proposal to jointly stick to the last remaining Russian-US arms control treaty, which expires in less than two months.
New START, which runs out on February 5, caps the number of strategic nuclear warheads that the United States and Russia can deploy, and the deployment of land- and submarine-based missiles and bombers to deliver them.
Putin in September offered to voluntarily maintain for one year the limits on deployed strategic nuclear weapons set out in the treaty, whose initials stand for the (New) Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.
Trump said in October it sounded “like a good idea.”
“We have less than 100 days left before the expiry of New START,” said Sergei Shoigu, the secretary of Russia’s powerful Security Council, which is like a modern-day politburo of Russia’s most powerful officials.
“We are waiting for a response,” Shoigu told reporters during a visit to Hanoi. He added that Moscow’s proposal was an opportunity to halt the “destructive movement” that currently existed in nuclear arms control.
Nuclear arms control in peril
Russia and the US together have more than 10,000 nuclear warheads, or 87 percent of the global inventory of nuclear weapons. China is the world’s third largest nuclear power with about 600 warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists.
The arms control treaties between Moscow and Washington were born out of fear of nuclear war after the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. Greater transparency about the opponent’s arsenal was intended to reduce the scope for misunderstanding and slow the arms race.
US and Russia eye China’s nuclear arsenal
Now, with all major nuclear powers seeking to modernize their arsenals, and Russia and the West at strategic loggerheads for over a decade — not least over the enlargement of NATO and Moscow’s war in Ukraine — the treaties have almost all crumbled away. Each side blames the other.
In the new US National Security Strategy, the Trump administration says it wants to reestablish strategic stability with Russia” — shorthand for reopening discussions on strategic nuclear arms control.
Rose Gottemoeller, who was chief US negotiator for New START, said in an article for The Arms Control Association this month that it would be beneficial for Washington to implement the treaty along with Moscow.
“For the United States, the benefit of this move would be buying more time to decide what to do about the ongoing Chinese buildup without having to worry simultaneously about new Russian deployments,” Gottemoeller said.